- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
OceanMan
| Favorite team: | UNO |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 23334 |
| Registered on: | 3/2/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I haven’t watched any of these games thinking they lacked a great atmosphere, especially for the home team.
quote:
Back from the match… holy hell that was fun. Also, just realized I forgot the “low” for “Eastern Low Block” in the thread title. That’s on me guys
You were in the stadium? That’s awesome I can’t imagine a much better sports experience
re: Department of Revenue fee for hybrid vehicles.
Posted by OceanMan on 7/1/26 at 4:28 pm to RemyLeBeau
quote:
If there is an online option, it will be through a 3rd party (no doubt kickbacks come into play here) and a processing fee.
You can pay it directly through LaTap with a bank account for no fee.
quote:
So I’m half retarted but has anyone done the math on electricity taxes to charge your vehicle vs gas taxes?
Supercharger is 7% sales tax in LA while gas tax is $0.20/gallon. So a 20 gallon tank would be $4 in tax.
The superchargers in LA are usually $0.37/kwh, so the 7% tax is roughly 5% of that cost. If gas is an average of $4/gal, the $0.20 tax would also be 5% of the cost, and would obviously increase as gas prices decrease (10% of the cost at $2/gal). A “fill up” for 60kWh would be about $1.25 compared to $4 for a 20 gallon tank.
Because electric are so much more efficient, even though they would pay a similar rate per energy unit, they consume less energy units and thus pay less tax at the “pump”. Charging at home is much cheaper more like $.10-.15/kWh
Now if we just look at the hybrid/electric fee relative to the gas tax - For the $120/year full electric fee, at $.20/gallon that assumes 600 gallons of fuel you could have bought. At 20 mi/gallon that assumes 12,000 miles/year driven. Just rough math to show this tax pretty much would offset an average drivers gas tax, before considering sales tax on electricity purchases.
Get a LATap account and pay it directly online.
Get an irs.gov account too. Closest you are going to get to being able to see what they can see, may as well use it
Get an irs.gov account too. Closest you are going to get to being able to see what they can see, may as well use it
Yes. I wouldn’t get shite done and wouldn’t get reelected, but the only way I would ever agree to the office is to remain ethical. Not sure how I ever got elected in this scenario as I would need to have promised nothing to anyone in order to reduce pressure.
quote:
I work for a huge company & I can explain why Customer Service is dead & not coming back. 1. Companies do not want to pay decent money for Customer Service employees in America & have outsourced them to India & the rest of Asia 2. Americans for the most part do not want these jobs & can make the same money living off the government & not have to get screamed at all day by Totalitarian Karens. 3. AI, Chat, & technology are getting used more & more every day. Most people 30 & under are completely terrified by talking to anyone on the phone.
I think you missed the biggest one: companies would rather pay cheap labor and make you grind out a solution than just offering to make it right, because it’s more profitable. If it takes a hours for you to exchange a pair of $50 shoes, you will likely wind up keeping the shoes. All they had to do was develop and AI gatekeepers and pay someone overseas $4/hr to tell you they are sorry and they are escalating the issue and to not worry.
re: World Cup Daily Thread - Mon., June 29
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 10:57 pm to CBandits82
That was awesome. I tuned in right before the end of the first half and was like this one is going to be good. Did not disappoint. It was a battle
And it continues.
re: “Renters don’t pay property taxes”
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 9:03 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Further, homestead exemption does not qualify for rental property, so a person who rents a $150,000 valued house is paying MORE than the guy who owner occupies the same value house.
But they have access to their cash and/or not paying interest if they borrowed cash. And the owner of the rented property is actually the one paying more, as rent is market based and not perfectly correlated with variations in ownership expenses like they would be if they owned it.
quote:
hurr durr
Hurr durr indeed
re: “Renters don’t pay property taxes”
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 8:58 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
We had a property tax election yesterday and the number of “hurr durr renters don’t pay property taxes” comments was disturbing.
quote:
Property taxes are an expense of the building owner.
It’s almost like you get it.
Without even getting into a more nuanced discussion, rent is largely market based and requires a rental agreement with a stated rental rate. That rate typically doesn’t increase for residential leases if property taxes go up. So theoretically, a renter can vote for every single property tax in an area, benefit from services, until the rental rate is finally adjusted, complain the rent is too damn high and move somewhere to do the same thing.
Property owners have rent collection risk, but are still responsible for taxes; if they don’t pay they risk their asset. The one bearing risk getting a potential benefit is a pretty standard concept in economics.
quote:
We have a rough idea of what we want to do.
quote:
I've done many international trips where I booked the airbnb while on the flight overseas
We got different definitions of “rough idea” :lol:
re: itinerary on vacation: yes or no?
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 8:42 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Not really. We usually plan one thing per day, like a baseball game or something else ticketed and try to have general ideas of where we will be and what is good to eat in the neighborhood we will be.
Having a plan is good, having an itinerary is exhausting.
Having a plan is good, having an itinerary is exhausting.
re: Anthony Eyanson is good at baseball
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 8:39 am to Kool Kaliper
That’s not really true. Getting noticed and being developed are basically everything in baseball, and it clearly worked out for all of those guys. Particularly with transfers. You got one more year to make a draft push, where you goes matters. It’s pitching, you will get playing time if you are good enough
But of course, money also matters
But of course, money also matters
quote:
All these high and mighty football fans complaining about offsides when the NFL still doesn’t know what a catch is and then reviews a replay for 10 minutes to still get the call wrong
The comparison to football keeps being brought up by the soccer people. It’s a silly comparison to begin with.
And to your point, the over regulation in football has indeed had a negative impact on the game. I think that’s a fairly common sentiment. So I think a football fan can actually provide interesting insight in terms of regulation and its impact on the game, and you don’t need to reject their insight simply because you are cranky that you woke up early to watch a game played in Milan.
re: The way they determine offsides is killing the game
Posted by OceanMan on 6/29/26 at 7:57 am to RemouladeSawce
quote:
Wait till American football fans hear about the line of scrimmage
Established by the referees after every single play so everyone knows where it is and lines up on it at the start of the next - a play cannot happen if the offense is offside. It is not established relative to another player during a live play, and whether it is actually a penalty depends on other actions.
If you are seriously trying to equate these two concepts, you should save your smug replies. It isn’t the same concept at all. The sports are completely different, primarily because football has defined possessions and set plays that begin at the LOS that is clearly marked and spotted by the ref. And even given that everyone knows about it, they aren’t using technology to see if someone’s toe or finger is on that line at the start of the play because it would make an immaterial difference.
The purpose of the penalty in soccer is to prevent an advantage. The equivalent in football would be not allowing a receiver to get past the defender (or second to last one) before the QB throws it. I suppose that could be an interesting concept and could potentially be just as fun to watch, but if the defense decided to sell out and bring the safety on a delayed rush, and there was a penalty on the receiver because of a toe being too far when the ball is thrown, even though his position hasn’t changed and still needs to beat his defender and complete the catch, it would seem excessively hard to score, and more importantly, points would come off the board….and to my point you responded to, people would be complaining. Just like people from Qatar, Iran, Colombia and others have been about certain WC plays.
re: The way they determine offsides is killing the game
Posted by OceanMan on 6/28/26 at 3:28 pm to bulletprooftiger
quote:
Football, the most popular sport in the US, has dozens of highly subjective and technical calls. One plainly defined and objectively enforced rule is not effecting the popularity of soccer in the US.
It definitely is. Not that hard to see…soccer pleb: “hey that guys toe is on the line that seems silly they called the goal back” gatekeeping American fan: “there are no wrong calls in futbol you should leave”
Also, the sports are not at all comparable in terms of the need and enforcement of rules. I actually appreciate that soccer is the most fluid, and the calls and timing aren’t always perfect. Going halfway there kind of sucks.
All that being said, I love the World Cup, this one has been great and I love how much more popular the sport has become in the US.
re: The way they determine offsides is killing the game
Posted by OceanMan on 6/28/26 at 3:08 pm to RemouladeSawce
quote:
Totally, it’s just like American football calling touchdowns when the ball barely breaks the plane. It’s so bad for the sport to use technology on plays with objective parameters, getting it right is so bad for interest here
The evolution of officiating in American football has made the game unbearable. There are lots of similarities in today’s soccer. Some things are way too over regulated while others are like oh well shite happens.
quote:
I'm sure if they fixed that (and they likely will) the American fans that tune in only for the World Cup, will find another reason to complain about.
Americans aren’t the only ones complaining. Like at all. We have other sports to bitch about.
Having a floating boundary line with essentially no margin for error is a recipe for complaining. Particularly when the actual boundary line is more like a reference point, and there are missed fouls that obviously affect plays.
Oh and you saying they likely will “fix it” implies you understand that there is a problem.
re: Companies/products you’re surprised are still in business.
Posted by OceanMan on 6/27/26 at 2:36 pm to sidewalkside
Did not expect to see cheap booze that mixes well, just add people, in the OP.
I’m at Izzo’s now, didn’t even look open. This place used to be awesome but there is hardly anyone here. They don’t sell beer anymore either apparently. Still much better than chipotle
I’m at Izzo’s now, didn’t even look open. This place used to be awesome but there is hardly anyone here. They don’t sell beer anymore either apparently. Still much better than chipotle
re: World Cup locations
Posted by OceanMan on 6/27/26 at 9:18 am to FMtTXtiger
I’ve read this too many times. What the hell is your point?
Popular
0












