- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
OceanMan
| Favorite team: | UNO  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 22892 |
| Registered on: | 3/2/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
He took advantage of the situation and looks smart.
Smart? Who are we talking about again?
0
re: Trump: data centers can’t use existing grid - must provide own power to minimize our cost
Posted by OceanMan on 1/12/26 at 10:22 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Good, if it can actually stick.
It definitely can. They would own utilities if they could.
re: Hard to get excited about any player coming when they're only there for the money, not LSU
Posted by OceanMan on 1/12/26 at 10:01 pm to homemadeshine
quote:
Don't know about the rest of you, but I'm just having a hard time cheering for LSU when you know a majority of the players couldn't care less about LSU and are just using LSU for a paycheck.
It’s happening all over the country. At some point fans need to atop tuning in.
re: Whoa, this is what happens when Soy Boys pick the wrong person to make a statement.
Posted by OceanMan on 1/12/26 at 6:41 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
A cheap sucker punch is very on brand for maga, dont turn your back to these sick fricks kids.
Sucker punch? He was knocking tools out like a video game.
re: Daniel Stern from Home Alone busted trying to pick up hooker
Posted by OceanMan on 1/12/26 at 5:45 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
I see no problem with ole baw trying to get his dick wet.
Wet bandit, sticky bandit..:either way the name checks out
I do this line of work. We find it is really helpful for companies that can, or have hired someone at $150k+ a year as their accounting lead but struggle to see value, and basically have them as a very expensive admin that they have to deal with employee problems of a FT employee (sick kids, vacations, etc). Especially when that person is in charge of all accounting, they may struggle with higher level analysis. This problem gets worse the more qualified/compensated that individual is, because they are still just one person.
Having someone in that role FT is just not always a great fit. Often they just need a bookkeeper with some level of oversight. Companies in the $2M-10M range that have ownership in management often have limited resources but still need to talk about sensitive things with another manager is an ideal fit for fractional. With a fractional CFO, you get expertise for the things you need, but don’t need to wonder what I’m doing with my time when I’m not there, because you aren’t paying for it.
Other reason we may come in is for process improvements, tech stack recommendations or system implementation. If a company is good on accounting but needs someone with experience in these areas, having someone that sees how more companies do it is helpful.
Not all fractional CFOs are created equal. But if you can find the right fit it can be very beneficial, at least it has in my experience. My setup provides bookkeeping as well, but I’ve learned that I can basically only offer this with 3 clients max so I don’t do marketing.
Having someone in that role FT is just not always a great fit. Often they just need a bookkeeper with some level of oversight. Companies in the $2M-10M range that have ownership in management often have limited resources but still need to talk about sensitive things with another manager is an ideal fit for fractional. With a fractional CFO, you get expertise for the things you need, but don’t need to wonder what I’m doing with my time when I’m not there, because you aren’t paying for it.
Other reason we may come in is for process improvements, tech stack recommendations or system implementation. If a company is good on accounting but needs someone with experience in these areas, having someone that sees how more companies do it is helpful.
Not all fractional CFOs are created equal. But if you can find the right fit it can be very beneficial, at least it has in my experience. My setup provides bookkeeping as well, but I’ve learned that I can basically only offer this with 3 clients max so I don’t do marketing.
re: Reporter Lynn Jones congratulates Jaguars head coach after loss
Posted by OceanMan on 1/12/26 at 7:15 am to The Pirate King
quote:
They have other credentialed media that had legit questions
Doubtful, their questions were likely 100% stupid and would have gotten a less genuine reaction and response than this one got.
re: Agitator Swipes BP Agents Arm When He is Told to Get Back He Finds Out
Posted by OceanMan on 1/11/26 at 4:54 pm to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Too many of yall are too stupid to recognize government law enforcement overreach simply because you don’t like the libtards.
I don’t consider this peaceful or even a protest. This is impeding officers carrying out lawful action.
I’m not celebrating it by any means, but if you can’t see that allowing this behavior is problematic in terms of protecting the constitution, and the ability to actually enforce laws, you are the stupid one.
re: Agitator Swipes BP Agents Arm When He is Told to Get Back He Finds Out
Posted by OceanMan on 1/11/26 at 4:44 pm to SingleMalt1973
The local authorities not controlling this shite is absolutely ridiculous. These idiots are endangering themselves and in turn, the police.
re: Sheriff weighs in on ICE shooting
Posted by OceanMan on 1/11/26 at 12:05 pm to Darnell5445
quote:
Yes, because his background gives his opinion more validity than yours or mine.
No it does not. That’s a fallacy. Besides, this was a campaign message, so calling it an opinion is not exactly correct, as the purpose of his message is to persuade, not simply opine.
re: Sheriff weighs in on ICE shooting
Posted by OceanMan on 1/11/26 at 11:23 am to Darnell5445
The sheriff ignores that public trust is a two way street. If there is no inherent trust in police, situations like this are bound to happen. That’s what’s getting lost in all of this. Police simply cannot do their jobs if behavior like this is accepted.
He talks about escalation and de-escalation by police. There was no de-escalation available in this scenario, they were there to cause trouble. Police may be held to a high standard, but civilians must be held to some standard for that to work.
He talks about escalation and de-escalation by police. There was no de-escalation available in this scenario, they were there to cause trouble. Police may be held to a high standard, but civilians must be held to some standard for that to work.
I’m not old but I understand completely what you are saying.
Internet apps are the worst. Endless logins, UI changes, deleting features while adding complicated new ones, etc.
I can’t develop any muscle memory because of this shite, and it’s my job.
Internet apps are the worst. Endless logins, UI changes, deleting features while adding complicated new ones, etc.
I can’t develop any muscle memory because of this shite, and it’s my job.
quote:
She did hit him, she may very well have been trying to cause serious harm to him and deny it as an "accident"
She floored it with people trying to open both her door and the passenger (her wife), a person in front of her, a dog hanging out the window, perpendicular to oncoming traffic that she “waved around” with a Tahoe blacking her visibility in the direction she was going.
Regardless if she was trying to hit the officer, this was dangerously reckless and was only going to end in serious injury or her arse getting ripped out the car at gunpoint facing multiple felonies.
ETA: you only needed to watch the first video released to come to this conclusion
It would have been an all time hilarious comment and meme if her wife wasn’t dead within like 5 seconds of saying it.
And of course, the local police deciding to virtue signal rather than doing their jobs and controlling this crap enabled this tragedy to occur
quote:
Ahh, a trump God fearing Christian weighs in
How about you stop making assumptions about other people to remain in disagreement, and take a fresh look at all of these videos and challenge your original thought process.
You can still think she didn’t deserve to die, but there is no question that she invited an altercation with a large police presence. This is childlike behavior, it’s not acceptable, deflecting from that is condoning it.
re: New video of the 3 minutes leading up to the shooting
Posted by OceanMan on 1/10/26 at 12:32 pm to Classy Doge
quote:
I'd have loved to see this vantage point of the attempted ramming and neutralizing of the threat.
CNN released it yesterday I think. They had this entire video but hadn’t released this part.
It’s sad that she lost her life, but this behavior is completely unacceptable, and I find it even sadder that no one is going to learn from her mistakes.
I mean from start to finish this is unproductive for your cause, disruptive to the operation and the neighborhood.
Were they framing a house in the background? Between that and the horn honking I would have lost my shite.
re: AI might allow us to understand & communicate with animals soon
Posted by OceanMan on 1/10/26 at 7:54 am to hawgfaninc
We are losing the ability to talk to eachother, but we are gaining the ability to talk to birds and fish?
I thought the same thing, the way he worded that was like uh…isn’t that the purpose of ICE for our country :lol:
quote:
Cherrypicked screenshot (which is the last of the 4 below). She's continuously turning the wheel to her right which is away from the officer where he's positioned on her left headlight. Look at her hands and the relative position of the car.
quote:
The fact that y'all are making me defend this lunatic is stupid, because she's at fault as well.
What you are saying does not matter. the second the vehicle moved forward, she materially changed the outcome, regardless of intent. The fact that she struck the officer exposed her to bullets.
Popular
33
