- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McKnight shooter released from custody...Cliffnotes of Normand press conf inside
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:18 am to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:18 am to LSUFanHouston
The witnesses are lying or this is BS.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:20 am to REG861
The witness quote could be completely misleading.
Of course McKnight would be apologizing if gasser had already pulled his gun - they were probably all hot and yelling up to that point.
Doesnt mean joe had to die.
And unless new facts emerge gasser should be in jail for life.
O
Of course McKnight would be apologizing if gasser had already pulled his gun - they were probably all hot and yelling up to that point.
Doesnt mean joe had to die.
And unless new facts emerge gasser should be in jail for life.
O
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:20 am to TigahJay
quote:
quote:
It was someone else? McKnight shot himself?
Is it in any way possible that they think they have the wrong guy?
It's technically possible but highly unlikely. The guy gave the cops a gun when he turned himself in. There were several witnesses at a busy commercial intersection who watched the entire thing go down.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:20 am to Clockwatcher68
quote:
They should have held him as long as they are allowed so that they can avoid unrest.
You think the majority of people who are going to come loose and riot about this understand the system and how they have to charge or release in 24 hours? You're really giving them credit.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:21 am to REG861
There must be some exculpatory evidence that isn't in the news write up (shocking, I know). Even if the authorities weren't sure which charge to go with - manslaughter, murder 2, murder 1, etc. - they could charge him with manslaughter and then update later with an amended filing. Something doesn't add up.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:21 am to Rouge
quote:Splitting hairs here but still legally allegedly....
Justified or not, he is a killer
Bizarre (as was mentioned here) is a good term to describe this turn of events.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:25 am to GEAUXT
quote:
Knowing that there's no question he did kill him, they have to have some pretty solid evidence of justification to release him the next day
Not sure if it was confirmed, but rumor was he was an ex sheriff. He was also driving an Infiniti. Perhaps he's well connected?
I understand an Infiniti isn't the end all, be all, but you get the point.
ETA: To clarify for the morons, he may have decent financial resources, which combined with the rumor he's an ex sheriff, could have afforded him the benefit of the doubt and the legal representation needed to get out so quickly.
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 9:46 am
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:26 am to loustuni
Nobody's mentioned a mob hit.....
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:26 am to slackster
quote:
He was also driving an Infiniti. Perhaps he's well connected?
To what? The Japanese shitty car mafia?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:26 am to slackster
wait, he was driving an Infinity? String him up!
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:27 am to slackster
quote:
Not sure if it was confirmed, but rumor was he was an ex sheriff. He was also driving an Infiniti. Perhaps he's well connected?
I hope for all our sakes that neither of these things are true/had any bearing
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:27 am to HogBalls
quote:
I don't think we are getting the whole story. Do you know how much clout it would take to gun down a unarmed man, then walk the next day???
But they didn't say the investigation was closed. They said it was ongoing, and charges could be coming.
Normally in that situation, they charge the guy with something within 24 hours just so they can keep him.
Something tells me that if this was a 23 yr old black male as the shooter, he would be charged with something, and then if the investigation reveals he should not be charged, they drop the charge and release him.
By releasing him now, you are giving the impression that this was, at least as of the moment, a justified hit. It's hard for me to believe that if McKnight had no weapon on him.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:28 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
McKnight shooter released, no charges
This is about to get interesting
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:29 am to LSUFanHouston
That certainly is interesting. There would have to be very strong evidence to indicate self defense.
There must be a lot more to the details of this case. Possibly road rage on behalf of McKnight.
It sounds like the witness account is complete BS.
Does NOLA have video at major intersections?
There must be a lot more to the details of this case. Possibly road rage on behalf of McKnight.
It sounds like the witness account is complete BS.
Does NOLA have video at major intersections?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:31 am to Rouge
quote:
Riot would be justified
That is pathetic
They can't hold him indefinitely. If they know they won't be able to bring charges (for whatever reason) before that period is up, then releasing him is appropriate.
So, to me, the question that should be asked is what is preventing them from bringing charges right now.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:32 am to LSUFanHouston
When shite like this happens it 100% justifies all the ill feeling black folks feel towards the system. This is a mind boggling decision and does nothing for JP's racist image.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:32 am to LSUwag
quote:
Possibly road rage on behalf of McKnight
Maybe but didn't the witnesses he stood over him and shot him a second time?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:33 am to LSUwag
There has to be video from one of the businesses or a bystander (cell phone vid?) and it has to show McKnight being the aggressor. That is the only way I see this happening so quickly. Why wouldn't JPSO say that though?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:35 am to Walking the Earth
quote:
Maybe but didn't the witnesses he stood over him and shot him a second time?
Who are the witnesses? Are they the same folks who refuse to cooperate with police in any black on black crime?
Popular
Back to top



0




