Started By
Message

re: McKnight shooter released from custody...Cliffnotes of Normand press conf inside

Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:30 pm to
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58515 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I can't figure what side chad is on


all i can see is Chad loves him some Will Smith.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:30 pm to
I think some sort of telecommunications Tel-Com or Tel-Con is the name.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:31 pm to
He took a hard stance the second Smith got killed. Once more to the story started coming to light, he stayed with his original opinion regardless of facts.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

so you are saying "they", JPSO, "whomever" are trying to tarnish Gasser's image even more than the media has already done, preaching another NFL "star" being "murdered" on the streets on NOLA?


Huh?

I think Gasser is responsible for whatever his image may be. The prior incident, coupled with a road rage incident where he killed a man, is plenty reason to believe Gasser is a shitty human being. Whether a crime can be proven is another story altogether.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 4:33 pm
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8684 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

anything they would find would be completely inadmissible in this case due to double jeopardy,


Could very easily come in under Prieur.

Basically, evidence of other crimes or bad acts is admissible to show motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or accident.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 4:34 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:35 pm to
Even if he was never convicted?
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40491 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:37 pm to
Nope
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178854 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:40 pm to
Their only argument is I'm pro Will cause he was a Saint but disregard all the facts that will put Hayes in jail
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 4:40 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
109203 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Obligatory: im not a lawyer ot pretend to be.


But did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8684 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Even if he was never convicted?


Absolutely, doesn't even have to be something you were formally charged with.

Prieur is used every, single day to bring in evidence of prior bad acts much less similar than the situation currently being discussed.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 4:44 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:46 pm to
That doesn't seem right. So shite that I may or may not have done in the past with no evidence or wittneses can be used as evidence in a separate case.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58515 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

think Gasser is responsible for whatever his image may be. The prior incident, coupled with a road rage incident where he killed a man, is plenty reason to believe Gasser is a shitty human being. Whether a crime can be proven is another story altogether.
Hey, im not knighting for Gasser, but media started painting a picture of how some great lawabiding citizen NFL player was murdered while just minding their own business. Which has come out to be far from the truth in both instances.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8684 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

That doesn't seem right. So shite that I may or may not have done in the past with no evidence or wittneses can be used as evidence in a separate case.


The state has to prove by a preponderance of evidence (or clear and convincing, debatable based on situation) standard at a pretrial hearing that both the crime occurred and that the defendant was connected with the crime.

And to be clear, the evidence can't be offered to show character. It's pretty simple, however, to fit what's basically character evidence into one of those several other categories.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66089 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

That doesn't seem right. So shite that I may or may not have done in the past with no evidence or wittneses can be used as evidence in a separate case.




shite happens daily. this shows cardelle hayes lawyer will pretty much "defame" will smith's character. stuff that got swept under the rug will be magnified to show he was a POS too.

LINK
Jump to page
Page First 96 97 98
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 98 of 98Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram