- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:55 am to beerJeep
Read Harry’s post history, the delusion is real. Meth probably destroyed his critical thinking facilities.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:03 am to Chromdome35
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:23 am to stout
quote:
Elon must be a Putin fanboy too
Putin is certainly an Elon fanboy
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:27 am to stout
Greenwald is a tremendous apologist for Xi’s despotic regime. He denies every last bar act the Chicoms do. These are the people you’re linking arms with. Congrats.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:30 am to REG861
Look, China is a conservative country. Family values. Russia is a conservative country, anti lgbtqmnop. Iran is a conservative country, all about faith and God.
The only thing the other countries have is democracy. Who needs that shite anyway?
The only thing the other countries have is democracy. Who needs that shite anyway?
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:42 am to doubleb
quote:
Do you think Putin is going to say anything that is going to undermine his position? I don’t.
No. But he will say something highlighting what most of us already know - this is a money laundering scheme used by DC to get rich off of Americans ignorant of history over there.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:56 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Do you think Putin is going to say anything that is going to undermine his position? I don’t.
No. But he will say something highlighting what most of us already know - this is a money laundering scheme used by DC to get rich off of Americans ignorant of history over there.
Maybe it would help you "already know" if you would understand what the definition of money laundering is in the first place.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:02 am to Coeur du Tigre
Tucker would spell it 'Kiev'.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:14 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Putin is certainly an Elon fanboy
Better than this thread which is 90% Biden fanbois
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:16 am to SirWinston
quote:
Better than this thread which is 90% Biden fanbois
Ironic considering you are head over heels for Bidens little tranny girl
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:25 am to theunknownknight
quote:
No. But he will say something highlighting what most of us already know - this is a money laundering scheme used by DC to get rich off of Americans ignorant of history over there.
Why would he wait for Tucker? He could implicate Biden, Schumer, and the others any time he wants. He doesn’t need Tucker.
I hope Tucker conducts a good hard hitting interview. I have no problem with him doing that.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:31 am to theunknownknight
quote:
No. But he will say something highlighting what most of us already know - this is a money laundering scheme used by DC to get rich off of Americans ignorant of history over there.
You don’t even know what money laundering is. It’s just more word vomit you and your 4chan incels repeat ad nauseum.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:32 am
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:41 am to doubleb
I’m a Trump Republican. I also support Ukraine not laying down to Russia and fighting for their land too. Just because I’m one doesn’t mean i can’t be another and it feels like this is a which side are argument when it shouldn’t be. You can’t just allow a superpower to invade a much smaller sovereign country. What kind of precedent is that setting to Putin? if he got Ukraine what stops him from taking Moldova too in a day is all it would take. He can’t take Lithuania, Estonia or Latvia because he wants no part of NATO. How does it make the rest of the world plus the United States to just look to just sit by and let Russia take cover 2 countries and do nothing? I honestly don’t think there was a choice but to help the Ukrainians fight them off the best they can. This war ends at the negotiating table anyway after this election season. I don’t see it lasting past 2025.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:42 am
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:43 am to theunknownknight
quote:and the nazi salt mine bio labs
But he will say something highlighting what most of us already know - this is a money laundering scheme used by DC to get rich off of Americans ignorant of history over there.
Don't forget about that
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:53 am to AUstar
"The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (Russian: ??????????? ??´?? ?????´????? ??????´???, Vooružjonnyje Síly Rossíjskoj Federácii), commonly referred to as the Russian Armed Forces, are the military of Russia. In terms of active-duty personnel, they are the world's fifth-largest military force, with 1.15 million and at least two million reserve personnel.[10] According to the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), "Russia plans to expand its active personnel force to 1.5 million by 2026, which will make it the third largest in the world, after China and India."[11] "
quote:
What I am concerned with is the death toll. NYT says that half a million have been killed with Russia losing 400,000 military personnel. That would mean that just about their entire Army has been wiped out in less than 2 years. I call bullshite.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:09 am to Auburn1968
Russia went into Ukraine with around 150K men, and they were outnumbered by the Ukrainians for the most the war. Total size of the ground forces is around 500k.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:17 am to Harry Rex Vonner
Ukraine gave up its nukes based on the Budapest Memorandum signed in 1994 providing American, UK and others promises to assure Ukraine's sovereignty. I remember it well, even indirectly acquainted with some of the American engineers who helped dismantle Ukraine's nukes.
Maybe they shouldn't have trusted our guarantee.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:21 am to Auburn1968
As party of that same deal, we guaranteed Russia that NATO would not expand east. Despite that we expanded it to the point of preparing to include Ukraine. I don’t agree with Russia invading Ukraine, but the writing was in the wall when we continued expanding east.
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:22 am to Lima Whiskey
So basically the same situation that we faced in Iraq instead we captured Baghdad in under a month and Russia got defeated going for Kyiv and has decided to move to a stalemate just waiting for a peace where they get to keep what they currently hold
Interesting dichotomy there between military capabilities
Interesting dichotomy there between military capabilities
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 11:23 am
Page 3462 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News