Favorite team:
Location:Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Life in the fast lane, behind a slow driver
Number of Posts:8202
Registered on:11/27/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
It does appear that they are preparing for a mobilization.

I repeat my earlier comment on it. Calling a mobilization is one thing. Executing it is an entirely different thing. They still have to onboard, equip, train, transport, and deploy these troops. None of which Russia has demonstrated any competence in doing at much smaller scale during this war.

Then once you get them to the front, you have to keep them supplied until they can be gotten rid of in a meat wave assault.

Nate, what are your thoughts on how Russia will accomplish this?

quote:

Actually what I said was the fall of Pokrovsk and Siversk was the beginning of the end of Ukraine’s defense of Donbas. That was not a prediction, it was a statement of fact that has been borne out with subsequent events and will continue to be.


In the same way, the signing of the Declaration of Independence was the beginning of the end for the US.
Here is part 2 to your fantasy:

After Putin threatens Trump. Trump responds by showing Putin a picture of his remaining naval assets, air force, and space facilities, then telling Putin, if you harm one American, none of these will exist a week later, and we'll start selling Ukraine all the good stuff we haven't been selling them.
Is this one of your fantasies or did this happen? If so, provide a link.
It takes fuel to move those 1.5M mobilized troops to the front.
Dude, I am MAGA as frick. I wouldn't have voted for a dim under any circumstance.
If that's your best retort, it's just more proof that Texas heat has fried your brain, or all that jizz you ingested at A&M caused it.

Every time you post in this thread you just confirm to everyone that you are truly All hat and no cattle.



quote:


You do realize that if Russia announces a general mobilization, Ukraine is well and truly fricked.


Were Russia capable of onboarding, provisioning, training and deploying 1.5M solders, Ukraine would be well and truly fricked.

Nothing about what Russia has demonstrated so far in this war gives any confidence that they could accomplish this. In case you haven't noticed, Russia doesn't do logistics very well.

Around 2-3 months after the mobilization, most of those unfortunate souls will probably be dead.

They may not be the smartest people, but one thing is for sure, they are smarter than you.

All Hat, No cattle.
China has realized the US is vunerable via education. While we're arguing over DEI, chicks with dicks, and phantom racism, they are preparing for the future.

I've long thought much of this splintering and polarization we've seen develop was the result of a wildly successful psyop the Chinese ran on the US. A lot of this stuff came off the West Coast, exhibit every West Coast state, they are all eaten up with it.
The core problem for Ukraine was that the US didn't (still doesn't) have the manufacturing capacity to meet the demand for the missiles. Our stockpiles are low, I wonder how long we could sustain operations in a major war.

If the US had the manufacturing capacity, I believe we would have sold Ukraine all they wanted.
quote:

They’re pretty busy arresting people for Facebook posts and letting half of Africa rape their women.


This might be the first thing I've ever agreed with you on. Carry on.
I asked Claude Opus 4.8 High, this is its entire answer

Q: List several direct quotes, including source and date, where Putin has said their goal is to take all of Ukraine

A:
quote:

Direct answer with a caveat you'll want, because it matters analytically: clean, explicit quotes where Putin says "my goal is to take all of Ukraine" are rare. He has almost always framed it through denial of Ukrainian statehood ("one people," "not a real country") rather than a plain statement of conquest — and on at least one occasion said the opposite outright. The strongest single exception is from June 2025. Here's the actual record.

The one unambiguous quote

June 20, 2025, St. Petersburg International Economic Forum: "I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours," followed by "We have an old rule. Wherever a Russian soldier sets foot is ours." This is the closest he's come to saying it plainly, and even here it's wrapped in the "one people" logic rather than stated as a military objective.

Statements that deny Ukrainian statehood (the functional equivalent, but not literally "take all of Ukraine")

July 12, 2021, Kremlin essay "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians": "Russians and Ukrainians were one people – a single whole." The essay argues Ukraine can only be sovereign in partnership with Russia and questions the legitimacy of its borders. Multiple analysts called it a near-declaration of war, but it's a denial of independent nationhood, not an explicit conquest pledge.

April 2008, NATO Bucharest summit (reported, attributed via diplomatic accounts rather than an on-record public quote): Putin reportedly told George W. Bush that Ukraine was "not even a country." Treat this as secondhand — it's widely cited but not a verified verbatim public statement.

The counterpoint you should hold alongside these

February 24, 2022, invasion speech: Putin claimed Russia's goal was the "demilitarization and denazification" of Ukraine, and claimed that Russia had no plans to occupy Ukrainian land. He has periodically denied territorial occupation as the objective, which is why the Council on Foreign Relations notes Putin has actually said relatively little explicitly about his territorial ambitions, leaning instead on the "one people" framing.

Bottom line

If you're building an argument that Putin's stated goal is all of Ukraine, the honest version is: he has said it explicitly once (June 2025), implied it repeatedly through statehood denial, and occasionally denied the occupation framing outright. The "all of Ukraine" thesis is well-supported by the pattern of his rhetoric and the 2021 essay, but it rests heavily on interpretation of the "one people" doctrine, not a stack of clean verbatim conquest quotes. Anyone claiming the latter is overstating the record. Worth knowing which version you're standing on if someone pushes back.

This is a sensitive topic with a lot of loose attribution floating around — if you want, I can pull the full verbatim text of any of these from primary sources (Kremlin.ru hosts the 2021 essay and the SPIEF transcript) so you're quoting the original rather than press summaries.
quote:

Analysts have predicted a price between $400-$500


That was probably before RAM and SSD prices skyrocketed
Not a crippling blow due to redundancy, but a major loss for Russia.

quote:

The General Staff announced the destruction of the Dubna space communications center in the Moscow region.
Dubna is one of the key nodes of the Russian satellite infrastructure, through which communication channels, ground stations, and satellite network maintenance operate.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Short of Nukes, What do you think Russia can do that it hasn't already done?

Where do you think Russia's ability to end this will come from?
Synchopathy is an issue with all AI Chatbots. I have an anti-synchopathy section in both my Claude and ChatGPT global instructions, which sometimes works.