- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
SoonerK
Favorite team: | Oklahoma |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 931 |
Registered on: | 11/17/2021 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Stuck in jury duty
Posted by SoonerK on 4/18/24 at 8:42 am
Served as a jury foreman last year for case where the charges were 2 counts of 1st degree murder and 2 counts of attempted murder....
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 10:46 pm
[quote]Actually and factually, you are the one wrong.
LINK
168 million eligible and registered to vote. Of those, 154 million voted. Never in the history of the USA has 92% of registered voters actually voted.[/quote]
So you are either not reading anything else I have written in the thread ...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 8:25 pm
Those numbers do not add up.
US Population = 330 million
US <18y Pop = 73 million
US prison and parole ineligible = 4 million
US immigrants = 45 million
The US vote eligible population (330 - 73 - 4 - 45) = 208 million
2020 Census:
US citizen voting age population = 231.5 million
US pris...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:42 pm
[quote]No one gives a flip about your "guess." Especially after you stuck to methods double or triple counting nearly every voter who moved out of state in the past 5yrs.[/quote]
Oh enlightened one, what is your number of registered voters in 2020?...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:41 pm
[quote]And you been shown that method significantly overestimates eligible registered voters. That fact you're still touting it is telling.[/quote]
It could be overstating by 5% which can be expected as registrations are not a static data point....
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:38 pm
[quote]That is not my understanding at all. The USCB estimates registered voters regularly, not just in census years.
They employ a combination of methods data sources and statistical models including voter registration data and demographics, population projections and registration rates, surveys...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:34 pm
[quote]I would hope the EAVS does not use surveys to collect data like the Census does? Hopefully, they use hard data from the states and not surveys? 209m out of a possible 239m were registered to vote! That means 86% of all voting aged people were registered? That seems awfully high. That includes...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 5:10 pm
[quote]Those 168m numbers are pulled from the 2020 Census of people that responded to that question they were registered. What is missing is the 37.5m people that did not answer that question. How many of those 37.5m people are registered voters?
168m + 37.5 doesn’t get you to 209 million. That’s...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 4:59 pm
[quote]This info looks more accurate for 2020:[/quote]
Those 168m numbers are pulled from the 2020 Census of people that responded to that question they were registered. What is missing is the 37.5m people that did not answer that question. How many of those 37.5m people are registered voters?...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 3:58 pm
[quote]You made a claim, I provided you an opportunity to prove it. Instead of doing so you shrink away from it.
If you're too lazy to do the work, just say so.[/quote]
I showed you the data even with nice bullet points that you can easily read. Which is one more source than you will ever be abl...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 3:54 pm
[quote]
quote:
The mere fact that we can't agree on how many registered voters there are is proof that our system is broken and ripe for fraud.
Sooner is just confused on the data True Tiger. Yes the system is still ripe for fraud though.[/quote]
Friend, you are 100% completely wrong on this...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 3:47 pm
[quote]
DL the Census 2020 per state spreadsheet from this link, pick a state, find their 2020 registration data, then check the state's numbers against the Census' numbers.
Report back on the differences for each state and the total number.[/quote]
How about you show me anywhere that turnout f...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 3:40 pm
[quote]I would think that a poster chiming in to fact-check LT's claim should know that there were nowhere near 209m registered voters for the 2020 election. Ignorance is not a positive trait.
The U.S. Census Bureau estimates there were 168,300,000 registered voters at the time of the 2020 electi...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 3:36 pm
[quote]Um, uh, I think you just proved his and Lara's point [/quote]
Um, uh, the Census are surveys, not hard numbers. It is 209m registered voters and the numbers below are pulled from each state. But I guess you can just believe a Facebook post from 2021.
[link=(https://www.eac.gov/sites/defa...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 1:30 pm
[quote]
Yep in Michigan and some other places there was over 100% voter turnout LOL. Some states have cleaned up their voter roles but many have not. It is pretty easy to see how 81m "voters" voted for Biden if you know what I mean.[/quote]
2020 Election
Michigan
Total Active Voters: 7,209,30...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 1:16 pm
[quote]Jesus, that would still imply that 94% of voters voted for President in 2020. Is my math wrong?
158 million votes cast / 168 million registered = 94%[/quote]
Your math is not wrong, your data is. It is not 168m registered voters.
[link=(https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/document_...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 1:10 pm
[quote]There was 168m registered in 2020. It dropped by 10m in 2022 because a few states cleaned up their voter rolls. Never has there ever been 205m.[/quote]
You are using numbers from the Census, not the actual data reported by each state.
...
re: Lara Trump is not backing down. She is what the RNC has needed for quite some time.
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 12:56 pm
[quote]“Does anyone actually believe that in 2020, 81 million people were so inspired by a guy who could only get 10 people (to attended events) …that he had the most massive turnout in the history of elections?” she said at a Trump event in South Carolina just days before she announced her campaign...
re: Bill requiring Louisiana public schools to display the Ten Commandments passes House
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 12:50 pm
[quote]
This is so dumb. They'll be lucky if this doesn't lose at SCOTUS 9-0.[/quote]
In Stone v. Graham it was a 5-4 decision and that was with a more liberal SC than todays....
re: Hearing Testimony: LAGov. Jeff Landry wanted Rep. Garret Graves out in new congress map
Posted by SoonerK on 4/11/24 at 9:27 am
[quote]Yep. Gerrymandering was invented to turn voting districts majority black. So simple to understand.[/quote]
Except that the term Gerrymandering started in 1812. The act itself predates to the beginning of the country....
Popular