Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 10/20/23 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42643 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 1:24 pm to
I understand their motives, but guys like this should have faced justice years ago.
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8194 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:12 pm to
Not a great day for Russia, but I think you need a month of days like that in a small section of the line to make a real difference.

Ukraine needs to make a strategic imbalance somewhere and they haven’t seemed to be able to do that anyway. Maybe the fighter jets that are on the way will allow for that.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14814 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 3:55 pm to
It’s been a bad week for Russia loss wise. Not so much territory wise, but with current conditions, ukraine needs to degrade Russias equipment/manpower/logistics to move the line.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8615 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 5:32 pm to
The weather in Ukraine hasn’t been great for drones to fly and be effective but Russia is still running huge formations of armored vehicles trying to pull a pincer movement and encircle Avdiivka. These conditions would be perfect to roll out the Abrams or Leopard 2 tanks and let them pick Russian tanks off one by one from distance where the Russian T-72 would be hard pressed to accurately return fire. Once the drones come back out though I would pull those tanks back out of range.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105309 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

What possible risk/. reward calculus could the Russians possibly be looking at to justify the risk of those type of losses?
What strategic advantage would justify this type of repeated, costly attack?


It's impossible to know why the Russians are doing what the Russians are doing.

I tend to think they're really struggling to hold on in the south. They've been getting hit pretty hard for months and I'm sure they're hoping to relieve the pressure.

This could be the worst of all worlds, though -- massive losses, no gains, no relief for the south.




I have a mental image of Putin sticking pins in a map like Hitler.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5653 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 5:56 pm to
Ukraine Will Receive Even Longer-Range ATACMS, Kuleba Says

Ukraine’s top diplomat says Biden and Zelensky discussed future delivery of newer missiles that can reach up to 300 km

by John Moretti | October 20, 2023, 3:27 am

Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba said that, as a result of talks between President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Joe Biden on Thursday, he believes the US soon will give Ukraine ATACMS missiles that reach almost twice as far as the version included in the last shipment.

The Kyiv Post
Posted by ticklechain
Forgotten coast
Member since Mar 2018
834 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:06 pm to
I'm wondering how they hit so many helos in one spot. Are they parking them right next to each other? From what I've read they didn't get that many atacms (sp). They couldn't have targeted each individual helicopter....did they? Seems like parking them next to each other is poor form. Which they have shown plenty of in the past, but damn
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 6:08 pm
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5653 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

'm wondering how they hit so many helos in one spot


Each of the ATACMS that they got (M39 variant I believe) has 950 bomblets that are dispersed over a wide area.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 6:23 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14814 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

I'm wondering how they hit so many helos in one spot


They were given and used the cluster variant. Think it had about 1000 bomblets.

quote:

M39 (ATACMS Block I) missile with inertial guidance. It carries 950 M74 anti-personnel and anti-materiel bomblets, each about the size of a baseball[37] and weighing 1.3 lb (0.59 kg),[2] which are dispersed across a circular area approximately 677 feet (206 m) in diameter, covering 360,000 square feet (33,000 m2) in total

Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7401 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

I'm wondering how they hit so many helos in one spot. Are they parking them right next to each other?


Each ACTAM will disperse bomblets in about a 200m square area. You drop three of those with a little overlap, and even if they're half a football field spaced out on alternating sides of a runway, and it'd be pretty easy to get
Posted by Pendulum
Member since Jan 2009
8059 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 6:52 pm to
200m diameter, 3 missles, that's like 6 football fields with endzones in 360 degrees. That's insane.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 6:55 pm
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8615 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:16 pm to
Aircraft have extremely thin skin to save weight which allows you to carry more fuel and bomb loads so even a single bomblet in the right place can take an aircraft out for good but these ATACMS have about 900-1000 bomblets that get thrown out over a large area because in the final moments the ATACMS do a spin about 100 feet above the ground that throws the munitions to cover a wide area. Russia does have earth work shelters that protects it on the sides and rear but since the ATACMS releases it’s bomblets in the air those shelters provide little cover from bomblets raining down on top where there is no protection for the Russian helos. They do space the aircraft out about 150 feet from each other to protect from a conventional strike but they fired 3 ATACMS at the Berdyansk airfield and 3 more at Luhansk’s airfield which would have basically covered the entire tarmac punching holes through the helo’s skin, fuel tanks, avionics, etc. I’ve been saying the Berdyansk airfield should have been at the top of their target list and apparently it was. If this doesn’t happen in secret like it did Russia would have flown those aircraft out of range but now they have dealt the largest blow to Russia since Kerch getting hit and the Moskva being sunk.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30512 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

200m diameter, 3 missles, that's like 6 football fields with endzones in 360 degrees. That's insane.


I said earlier in the thread while I have never seen the missile-delivered cluster munitions I have seen the bomb versions dropped by fast movers. They dropped 4 of them about 1000m from us and we are on a little rise so we had a great vantage point and they were nothing short of terrifying. I have no idea how anything was still alive in that blast area unless it had 360 degree cover. If there were a billion ants in that area I bet they had 900 million ant funerals the next day. I thought a Mark 82 500 pounder threw up a lot of dirt but these things were in another zip code.
Posted by ticklechain
Forgotten coast
Member since Mar 2018
834 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:14 pm to
Gotcha, I thought they were just a single warhead of substantial size
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20974 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:23 pm to
The unitary warhead is the standard version of the ATACMS. We haven't made the cluster-bomb version in a while, as it isn't compliant with our current policy on cluster munitions. The ATACMS that were used in these strikes were made in 1996 and 1997 and are "expired."

That's why Ukraine has gotten the cluster-bomb version of ATACMS, instead of the unitary-warhead version: the cluster-bomb missiles are expired and noncompliant with DoD policy. The disposal cost is higher than the cost to send them to Ukraine.

It's worth noting that we have about 1200 of those old, cluster-bomb ATACMS that we could send to Ukraine.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4669 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:37 pm to
ISW Update

quote:

Russian forces launched a renewed offensive push near Avdiivka on October 20 and marginally advanced, indicating that the Russian military command remains committed to offensive operations in the area despite heavy materiel and personnel losses. Geolocated footage published on October 20 shows that Russian forces secured minor advances west of Krasnohorivka (5km north of Avdiivka).[1] Russian milbloggers and a Ukrainian military observer claimed that Russian forces captured a Ukrainian stronghold near the waste heap just northeast of Avdiivka, advanced to a rail station north of Avdiivka, and advanced near the “Tsarska Okhota” restaurant south of Avdiivka.[2] One prominent Russian milblogger claimed that Russian forces unsuccessfully attacked near Sieverne (6km west of Avdiivka), south of Avdiivka, near Stepove (8km northwest of Avdiivka), and near Novokalynove (11km northwest of Avdiivka), however.[3] Other milbloggers claimed that Russian forces advanced up to one kilometer on the Stepove-Berdychi line (8-10km northwest of Avdiivka) on October 19 and that fighting is ongoing near Berdychi on October 20.[4] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Ukrainian forces repelled Russian attacks near Avdiivka, Novokalynove, Stepove, Pervomaiske (11km southwest of Avdiivka), and Sieverne.[5]

The Ukrainian General Staff reported on October 20 that Ukrainian forces damaged and destroyed almost 50 Russian tanks and over 100 armored vehicles during the past day of fighting near Avdiivka.[6] Ukrainian soldiers operating in the Avdiivka area reported on October 20 that Ukrainian forces have destroyed 200 Russian armored vehicles in the past four days.[7] Avdiivka City Military Administration Head Vitaliy Barabash stated that Russian forces are attempting to repair damaged equipment while still in the field.[8] Footage published on October 20 shows Ukrainian forces striking a Russian TOS-1 thermobaric artillery system near Avdiivka.[9] A Russian milblogger complained that Russian counterbattery fire near Avdiivka is decreasing in effectiveness due to poor communication and the failure to stockpile munitions ahead of the offensive effort, very likely exacerbating material losses in the area.[10] The initial Russian offensive operations in the Avdiivka area on October 10 also resulted in high verified Russian equipment losses, and the fact that Russian forces regrouped and re-launched assaults after the initial attacks suggests that either Russian forces believe they can feasibly take Avdiivka, or that the Russian military command is poorly prioritizing offensive operations regardless of cost

Ukrainian forces continued larger-than-usual ground operations on the east (left) bank of Kherson Oblast on October 20 and established a confirmed presence in a settlement on the east bank. Geolocated footage published on October 19 indicates that Ukrainian forces advanced into northeastern Krynky (27km east from Kherson City and 2km from the Dnipro River).[12] Russian milbloggers claimed that Ukrainian forces are establishing a foothold near Krynky and continue to maintain their presence near the Antonivsky roadway and railway bridges.[13] A prominent Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces temporarily advanced further into Krynky up to the Kozachi Laheri-Krynky-Korsunka road before Russian airstrikes pushed Ukrainian troops back to the northern outskirts of the settlement.[14] Another Russian milblogger claimed that fighting is ongoing near Pishchanivka (14km east from Kherson City and 4km from the Dnipro River) and that a Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance group is operating on the southern outskirts of the settlement.[15] The prominent Russian milblogger suggested that Russian forces only maintained positions on the southern outskirts of Pishchanivka as of the afternoon of October 18, and the Ukrainian General Staff reported on October 19 that Russian aviation struck Pishchanivka, implying that Ukrainian forces were still operating in the settlement

Russian and Ukrainian sources continue to indicate that the Russian units defending the east bank of Kherson Oblast are relatively less combat effective than other Russian forces elsewhere on the front. A Ukrainian military observer stated that the Russian Dnepr Grouping of Forces is primarily comprised of elements of the 49th Combined Arms Army (Southern Military District) and likely elements of the newly created 18th Combined Arms Army

Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations near Bakhmut and in western Zaporizhia Oblast but did not make confirmed advances. A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces made marginal advances northwest of Verbove (10km east of Robotyne), though ISW has not observed evidence to confirm this claim.[24] The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Ukrainian forces continue offensive operations in the Bakhmut and Melitopol (western Zaporizhia Oblast) directions.[25] Russian sources reported Ukrainian attacks south of Bakhmut on the Klishchiivka-Andriivka-Kurdyumivka line and south of Orikhiv near Robotyne, Novoprokopivka, and Verbove.[26]

Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Southern Military District (SMD) headquarters in Rostov-on-Don, Rostov Oblast, on October 19 to discuss the battlefield situation in Ukraine. Russian media reported that Putin met with the Chief of the Russian General Staff and overall theater commander for Russian forces in Ukraine Army General Valery Gerasimov, who told Putin that Russian troops are "solving problems in accordance with the operation plan."[27] Various elements of the SMD are notably currently deployed in critical areas of the frontline — elements of the SMD's 8th Combined Arms Army are conducting offensive operations near Avdiivka in Donetsk Oblast, elements of the 58th Combined Arms Army are defending against ongoing Ukrainian offensive operations in western Zaporizhia Oblast, and elements of the 49th Combined Arms Army are operating in the Kherson Oblast direction as of late August 2023.[28] Putin's publicized visit with Gerasimov indicates that Gerasimov is still the active figurehead of Russian operations in Ukraine and was likely meant to posture the effectiveness and involvement of the Russian military leadership as Russian forces pursue offensive and defensive operations along multiple sectors of the front


Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4669 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Key Takeaways:

Russian forces launched a renewed offensive push near Avdiivka on October 20 and marginally advanced, indicating that the Russian military command remains committed to offensive operations in the area despite heavy materiel and personnel losses.

Ukrainian forces continued larger-than-usual ground operations on the east (left) bank of Kherson Oblast on October 20 and established a confirmed presence in a settlement on the east bank.

Russian and Ukrainian sources continue to indicate that the Russian units defending the east bank of Kherson Oblast are relatively less combat effective than other Russian forces elsewhere on the front.

Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations near Bakhmut and in western Zaporizhia Oblast but did not make confirmed advances.

Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Southern Military District (SMD) headquarters in Rostov-on-Don, Rostov Oblast, on October 19 to discuss the battlefield situation in Ukraine with Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov.

Russian forces conducted offensive operations along the Kupyansk-Svatove-Kreminna line, near Bakhmut, around Avdiivka, west of Donetsk City, in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area, and in western Zaporizhia Oblast and made limited advances in some areas.

Russian Investigative Committee Head Alexander Bastrykin argued on October 20 that Russian authorities should strip migrants of acquired Russian citizenship if they are unwilling to fight in Ukraine.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8615 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 11:13 pm to
I believe this first shipment of ATACMS was for only 12. Joe’s handler who is basically the real POTUS wants to see how they use them but I’m pretty sure more will follow quickly in greater numbers and unitary warhead variants will also come in time. Right now though they are disposing of missiles at a big discount handing them over to the Ukes.
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 10/21/23 at 12:29 am to
Zelenskyy bans Christianity in Ukraine.

Imagine supporting the sweaty Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Joe Biden, The MIC, and Ukraine in October of 2023

This post was edited on 10/21/23 at 12:31 am
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5653 posts
Posted on 10/21/23 at 4:56 am to
SBU: Russian Orthodox Church runs private military companies to train fighters for Ukraine deployment

The Kremlin-linked Russian Orthodox Church is building and running private military companies (PMC), which recruit and train fighters for deployment in Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reported on Oct. 19.

The Church receives funding for these activities from financial and industrial groups close to Russian President Vladimir Putin, the SBU said. These funds are reportedly donated as "charitable contributions" for "construction of churches."

One example of a church-run PMC named by the SBU is the St. Andrew's Cross organization based in the Kronstadt Naval Cathedral in northwestern Russia.

The Russian news outlet Bloknot reported on the St. Andrew's Cross's activities last year, calling it "the first PMC under the Russian Orthodox Church." The group was reportedly set up in 2017 to provide military training for other mercenary companies' recruits.

The Kyiv Independent

first pageprev pagePage 3318 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram