- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:14 am to stout
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:14 am to stout
quote:
And frick you for equating me to the Q guys. You can frick right off with that bullshite. I am not grouping you in with the Zelensky cucks like GOP Tiger or citizenk so frick you for taking the low-hanging fruit and grouping me in with those Q idiots.
i wasnt, sorry if i wasnt clear. i was talking about the fricking idiot auburn fan that was responding to you. i was asking a question, not equating you to them at all as I know enough about you to know you are anything but an idiot like those guys.
quote:
Come on, dude. You are being obtuse too. Do you truly think it wasn't at all a factor?
no im not. the biolabs was nothing but russia propaganda, atleast in ukraine.
the biolabs where we are and have funded gain of function is in china, not ukraine.
i mean i 100% beleive ukraine is currupt as frick, like most countries in eastern europe and like russia.
and to be fair. GOP tiger....is just being ultra defensive this morning. he isnt a zelensky cuck more like just anti-russian
citzenk is just being a complete douche this morning, he normally isnt liek that either
in this thread usually only have 3 or 4 true zelensky cucks and they are the same well known liberals from the poliboard.
again apologize if you took my post as me calling you a Q tard.
3
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:17 am to lsu777
Cool thanks
FWIW, considering how corrupt Ukraine is and how the US has used them for corrupt deals, I would not be shocked if the labs had existed. Not saying they did FWIW. Just saying nothing with regard to the US and Ukraine would shock me.
We will never know the depth of the corrupt dealings the US has had in Ukraine.
FWIW, considering how corrupt Ukraine is and how the US has used them for corrupt deals, I would not be shocked if the labs had existed. Not saying they did FWIW. Just saying nothing with regard to the US and Ukraine would shock me.
We will never know the depth of the corrupt dealings the US has had in Ukraine.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:20 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
WestCoastAg
dont be a fricking douche, he isnt and you know it.
the amount of emotional douche bags this morning in this thread is insane.
sorry but its a fireday and we have absolutely insanely beautiful weather right this moment and have SEC football to watch tomorrow. Its a great day to be an american, despite all of the bullshite going on in the world and certainly we shouldnt be infighting and jsut being douches to each other when we all agree on prolly 95% of things, atleast the 90%+ in this thread that are conservatives or further to the right.
in the end, we are fighting over 66 billion in foreign aide. many of us dont like it but in the end its a drop in the bucket and there are a million other things to be fighting about.
and we all know deep down that Russia isnt going launch nukes so everyone should chill the frick out and enjoy the day and ramp down the emotions.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:26 am to lsu777
Go back and read the first ten pages of this
thread....my favorite was we're the paper tiger
not Russia
thread....my favorite was we're the paper tiger
not Russia
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:26 am to lsu777
quote:
but he already had nato on his border for years. its way down the list of reason.
Maybe Putin doesn't like NATO on his borders because that severely limits his goal/desire to reestablish Russia's sphere of influence over those same exact countries. I wonder why all of those former Warsaw Pact nations requested NATO membership?
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:36 am to AU86
quote:
quote:but he already had nato on his border for years. its way down the list of reason. Maybe Putin doesn't like NATO on his borders because that severely limits his goal/desire to reestablish Russia's sphere of influence over those same exact countries. I wonder why all of those former Warsaw Pact nations requested NATO membership?
NATO is on his borders like you say, because Russia has a history of invading and interfering in all these surrounding countries over the last 200 years, and now Putin has made it clear he would like to reestablish those imperial boundaries. You can’t get mad when those countries want a buffer from invasion and interference.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:41 am to AU86
quote:
I wonder why all of those former Warsaw Pact nations requested NATO membership?
They did because they know Russia and Putin all too well. He has explicity stated that he wants restart the Soviet Union.
He regards any nation with a Slavic population to be subservient to Moscow. It’s insane but factual.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:56 am to stout
quote:
I think NATO being on his border plays a role in the decision. Not saying it is 100 percent the reason but no country would want a combined foreign military power that close to their borders.
Doesn’t this rationale take a bit of a hit when Russia voluntarily moves it’s border closer to the nato bloc by annexing part of Ukraine?
Posted on 10/14/22 at 9:58 am to Kentucker
I was sort of being sarcastic with that question. Of course everyone knows why those nations wanted to join Nato. They have lived under the thumb of the Soviets/Russians and they want no part of that system for their future.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:06 am to stout
quote:
This is what you idiots supporting this war are leading us into. They want nuclear war so badly.
What’s the point of MAD when it’s not MAD? They’re mad at Macron for being a typical French pussy who’s too close to Putin. He’s just undermined appearance of unity on this issue of nuclear deterrence through MAD which INCREASES the likelihood of nuclear war. Macron just gave Putin a visible crack in the NATO armor.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:08 am to lowspark12
quote:Well that's very easy to answer to. Russia bought it all with money from selling the gas from the pipeline that that Ukraine bombed. You see, the USA is giving Ukraine military gear that they sell to the Russians to bomb Ukraine forcing Ukraine to ask the USA for more equipment to fight off the Russians that are using the equipment the USA gave to Ukraine to fight off the Russians.
I just logged on to the black market and can’t find any Ukrainian gear
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 10:08 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:40 am to lsu777
quote:
in this thread usually only have 3 or 4 true zelensky cucks
I haven’t seen any “Zelinsky cucks” in this thread. Ukrainian’s president could be named Smith and the situation would be the same. Russia is engaged in a war of aggression in Europe. One either supports, tolerates or opposes military conquests in Europe. Most here oppose it. That is an anti-war position. To tolerate it is to accept wars of conquest. Our Russian posters actually support the war. This isn’t difficult and it is not a personality driven issue.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:44 am to TBoy
quote:
I haven’t seen any “Zelinsky cucks” in this thread. Ukrainian’s president could be named Smith and the situation would be the same.
But if Zelensky were named Smith, then giving aid to Ukraine wouldn't be so obviously part of the international Zionist conspiracy to control the world.
The anti-Semitism is important subtext.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:47 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
But if Zelensky were named Smith, then giving aid to Ukraine wouldn't be so obviously part of the international Zionist conspiracy to control the world.
I've enjoyed the Putin Parrots somehow managing to simultaneously believe that Zelensky is both part of an international Zionist conspiracy and a literal Nazi, or at least Nazi sympathizer
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:48 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
The anti-Semitism is important subtext.
People are very creative is inventing pretextual excuses to mask their true positions.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:58 am to stout
You say that defending Ukraine won’t take down Putin and Russia so why are they currently in the process of pulling out 60 year old T-62 tanks to send to the front lines? Seems like they are doing a pretty damn good job of it so far considering Putin expected its forces to be sitting in Zelensky’s office in Kyiv in 72 hours.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 10:59 am to TBoy
quote:
I haven’t seen any “Zelinsky cucks” in this thread. Ukrainian’s president could be named Smith and the situation would be the same. Russia is engaged in a war of aggression in Europe. One either supports, tolerates or opposes military conquests in Europe. Most here oppose it. That is an anti-war position. To tolerate it is to accept wars of conquest. Our Russian posters actually support the war. This isn’t difficult and it is not a personality driven issue.
i actually agree.
i prefer stability and security for economic reasons obviously, and this upsets the apple cart as does any invasion.
also to address the Nato thing, its very obvious why the former warshaw pact countries want in Nato. and Putin already had nato on his border...i do not beleive that was his biggest issue. his biggest issue has been the influence on economic factors by the EU in Ukraine and the role that plays in politics and influence.
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:03 am to LSUPilot07
quote:
You say that defending Ukraine
Cheerleaders are fine. It's the monetary help that prolongs the war, which leads to shortages and death, and more money and arms pouring into god knows which groups hands.
I can't wait to see how well armed them Chechnyans will be after the war is over.
We've proven to be a pretty shitty ally over the past couple of decades.
This post was edited on 10/14/22 at 11:05 am
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:05 am to lsu777
quote:
Vladimir Putin is determined to shape the future to look like his version of the past. Russia’s president invaded Ukraine not because he felt threatened by NATO expansion or by Western “provocations.” He ordered his “special military operation” because he believes that it is Russia’s divine right to rule Ukraine, to wipe out the country’s national identity, and to integrate its people into a Greater Russia.
LINK
Posted on 10/14/22 at 11:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I can't wait to see how well armed them Chechnyans will be after the war is over.
Hopefully well enough they can try Elon's vote yourself off the island peace strategy
Page 1988 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News