- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:47 pm to Lowdermilk
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:47 pm to Lowdermilk
0
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:47 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Was the fact that he was fired brought out in any way?
Jackson brought it up in the opening and during the testimony of his friend Brennan got in that he was fired for the text messages.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:50 pm to civiltiger07
Then yeah, don't call him.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:54 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
I'm thinking that not calling Proctor goes along with the rest of the defense strategy of there was no pedestrian strike. Proctor does nothing for them when it comes to showing that there was not a pedestrian strike.
Yep. I assume, based on how the trial has gone, they came in with two goals. 1. Discredit certain witnesses. 2. Bring credit to the dog bite.
If a jury thinks certain witnesses were not trust worthy and if they are thinking that the only wounds on O'keefe (other than the back of his head) was possibly caused by a dog then there is no way they can convict KR.
And the more they discuss dog bites, they more the jury is thinking about it. So actually, come to think about it, this is playing perfect for the defense. They have spent a lot of time talking about how O'keefe's wounds appear to look like dog bites more than anything.
This jackass has spent the last two days trying to discredit the dog bite theory with little success.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:58 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
I'm thinking that not calling Proctor goes along with the rest of the defense strategy of there was no pedestrian strike. Proctor does nothing for them when it comes to showing that there was not a pedestrian strike.
I totally get that and I'm very happy they are going full force with the "he didn't get hit by a car" argument over the 3rd party culprit argument. I still just think there is so much there that would also point towards "bad investigation" and that there is no way under any circumstance that having Proctor up there could help the commonwealth. I don't think it will make or break the case, it's just me nitpicking what I would have done differently.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:59 pm to AlxTgr
Rentschler - "If you cant prove the the impact happened, then everything after that doesn't actually matter does it?
Just owned Hank on his own cross.
Love this dude.
Just owned Hank on his own cross.
Love this dude.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:10 pm to Saintsisit
This is the stuff that drives me insane about these interrogations. He’s perseverating on the glass in the nose currently. If his nose had glass in it from being struck by a vehicle, there would be obvious trauma to the face. He’s looking for an AHA! Moment when in reality he looks like an absolute idiot. It’s a moot point.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:11 pm to Saintsisit
how can the prosecution talk about glass in the nose on a cross when the defense didn't bring it up
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:12 pm to wileyjones
What a sad weak soyboy cross from Hank.
Hank taking another frickin L. Nothing landed at all.
Hank taking another frickin L. Nothing landed at all.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:21 pm to Saintsisit
quote:
Just owned Hank on his own cross.
Unless I am perceiving it different, right now Hank is helping the defense, while they sit back and watch.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:52 pm to OweO
quote:
Unless I am perceiving it different, right now Hank is helping the defense, while they sit back and watch.
That's what I'm thinking. The more he questions this guy, the more he's convincing that there were never a hit by a car. Redirect is going to be good.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:07 pm to Gris Gris
I have had meetings all day today so I'm busy catching up. I'm still an hour or so behind but so far Rentschler demolished the CW's case and Aperture today. I don't know how Hank was able to continuously ask questions that let him say "John O'Keefe was not hit by a car". It's wild. I completely take back my statement a day or two ago about Hank probably being the best lawyer on either side.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:10 pm to bdavids09
quote:In a video I watched Karen and AJ spoke about the 1st trial being in the 700 to 800 million dollar mark but that was just back of napkin calculations. So you could only imagine on this one.
How much does this trial cost for defense? This trial has gone on forever.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:11 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
Hank said no more witness or evidence after defense rests.
Rentschler and Dr. L broke that sad, poor bastard.
Rentschler and Dr. L broke that sad, poor bastard.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:13 pm to jclem11
Shocked they have no rebuttal
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:13 pm to jclem11
I missed why the CW hired a special prosecutor for this. Is that normal?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:14 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
In a video I watched Karen and AJ spoke about the 1st trial being in the 700 to 800 million dollar mark but that was just back of napkin calculations.
it was 7 to 8 million. not 700 to 800 million
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:14 pm to BrewDrees95
quote:
Shocked they have no rebuttal
Hank is totally felted and fricked. His brain and spirit have been broken the last couple of days.
He has been flailing and seething and reaching. He is done and fricked.
Suffah Hank suffah!
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:15 pm to TigerBait1971
The Prosecution just stated that they are no longer putting up a rebuttal case.
So its likely that the defense rest tomorrow morning and they go straight into closing maybe?
So its likely that the defense rest tomorrow morning and they go straight into closing maybe?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 3:17 pm to civiltiger07
Bev said closing arguments on Friday. Charge conference tomorrow and no jury.
Page 112 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News