- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:43 am to Lowdermilk
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:43 am to Lowdermilk
Hank: "Is that funny?"
What a fricking a-hole.
Bev sustained the objection on that one. I'm surprised she didn't say "Answer the question, please."
What a fricking a-hole.
Bev sustained the objection on that one. I'm surprised she didn't say "Answer the question, please."
1
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:45 am to ILurkThereforeIAm
quote:
"Is that funny?"
Ask it a different way, Hanky. Remember I told you that last night when we were at happy hour.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:45 am to 10tiger
Personally, I don't think it would help and calling Higgins and Alberts only runs a risk to the defense. "OJO was our friend and can't believe this woman would hit him with her car!". And we both know Bev would allow 100% of that garbage.
On a side note, Hank is getting his arse handed to him.
On a side note, Hank is getting his arse handed to him.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:51 am to idlewatcher
You can feel Brennan sending his case is crumbling by the pettiness in this cross
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:54 am to 10tiger
quote:
Just wondering if yall think it would be beneficial at all to have called the homeowners
They did last trial and it confused the jury that they had to pick a side. This time they mainly proved that he wasn't struck by a vehicle.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:55 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
The CW clearly hired experts that would tell them what they wanted to hear and forced fake science to justify it.
This is pretty common across the country. Most of these "experts" retire when they get totally discredited.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 12:09 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
It's ridiculous that the judge is allowing Hank to ask the same question over and over again. He's trying hard to discredit the witness, but he's looking badly in my opinion. The witness is good and sticking to his guns.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 12:19 pm to Gris Gris
This ham sandwich business and conversation over lunch is so boring and stupid.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 12:45 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
On a side note, Hank is getting his arse handed to him.
Taxpayer money well spent.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 12:52 pm to winkchance
quote:
quote:
On a side note, Hank is getting his arse handed to him.
Taxpayer money well spent.
He's been so bad that Bev is sustaining defense objections.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 12:59 pm to Gris Gris
Give it a rest, Hank. Walk away with what little is left of your dignity at this point.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:02 pm to 10tiger
If this is the last witness and they finish with him today, do they start closing arguments right away? Or do they wait until tomorrow to do closings and then send the jury to deliberate?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:06 pm to ILurkThereforeIAm
quote:
If this is the last witness and they finish with him today, do they start closing arguments right away?
No the Commonwealth is going to present a rebuttal case.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:08 pm to civiltiger07
By this trial going as long as it is, we are missing some other whoppers of a trial
Lori Daybell, Diddy and the coroner affair murder
Frick you Hank!
Lori Daybell, Diddy and the coroner affair murder
Frick you Hank!Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:10 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Personally, I don't think it would help and calling Higgins and Alberts only runs a risk to the defense. "OJO was our friend and can't believe this woman would hit him with her car!". And we both know Bev would allow 100% of that garbage.
Proctor is the only person that I would have 100% called if I were the defense. With him I think it would only help their case and be virtually no risk. I'm torn on Higgins because as you stated, he could be a sympathetic figure but you are also leaving out some sketchy stuff like destroying his phone on a military base, butt dials, etc. But I trust the defense knows what they are doing.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:12 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
. But I trust the defense knows what they are doing.
Same. It's pretty to armchair the defense from our side
The Defense calls..........Judge Bev to the stand
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:31 pm to idlewatcher
does hank have a humiliation fetish?
The defense experts keep humiliating him on cross over and over and he keeps going back for more.
The defense experts keep humiliating him on cross over and over and he keeps going back for more.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:40 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Proctor is the only person that I would have 100% called if I were the defense. With him I think it would only help their case and be virtually no risk.
I'm thinking that not calling Proctor goes along with the rest of the defense strategy of there was no pedestrian strike. Proctor does nothing for them when it comes to showing that there was not a pedestrian strike.
If they were to call Proctor that would lead to them getting into the possible cover up, and they are steering clear presenting the cover up to the jury.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:42 pm to civiltiger07
quote:And I want to tell the jury, over and over, that the lead investigator was not called by the prosecution. Was the fact that he was fired brought out in any way?
I'm thinking that not calling Proctor goes along with the rest of the defense strategy of there was no pedestrian strike. Proctor does nothing for them when it comes to showing that there was not a pedestrian strike.
If they were to call Proctor that would lead to them getting into the possible cover up, and they are steering clear presenting the cover up to the jury.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 1:46 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Was the fact that he was fired brought out in any way?
From what I remember, it was only brought up in answers "favorable" to the CW. He was fired for the emails disparaging KR but NOT for planting evidence.
Page 111 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News