- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:14 pm to This GUN for HIRE
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:14 pm to This GUN for HIRE
When does counter trial begin?
1
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:46 pm to winkchance
Officially Nov 25. I think the motion to dismiss will be heard but no specific court date that I've heard.
I'm sure it'll get going after Christmas & 1st of the year sometime.
I'm sure it'll get going after Christmas & 1st of the year sometime.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 3:58 pm to This GUN for HIRE
The sidebar transcripts are being released. I have zero experience with this but it seems like the judge was doing more than what a judge normally does during a trial.
She seems to sometimes be telling the prosecution what to do and if the prosecutor doesn't agree she will enforce things anyway.
Would like to hear actual lawyer's opinions that have seen the sidebar transcripts.
She seems to sometimes be telling the prosecution what to do and if the prosecutor doesn't agree she will enforce things anyway.
Would like to hear actual lawyer's opinions that have seen the sidebar transcripts.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 5:32 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
seems like the judge was doing more than what a judge normally does during a trial.
There was some conversation about the judge in this thread. May have been discussed.
The Lifetime movie comes out Saturday
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:08 am to This GUN for HIRE
Anything new regarding these cops and DA going down?
Posted on 3/4/26 at 9:49 am to winkchance
quote:
Anything new regarding these cops and DA going down?
Last I heard, he wasn't running for re-election because the community hates him.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 10:40 am to winkchance
just fighting in the Civil Cases right now.
Proctor got his phone back and immediately accidentally "lost" it. While the Commonwealth doesn't want to return Karen Read's phones to her, and they are filing motions to maintain possession of the phones.
Proctor got his phone back and immediately accidentally "lost" it. While the Commonwealth doesn't want to return Karen Read's phones to her, and they are filing motions to maintain possession of the phones.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 10:46 am to civiltiger07
quote:I can't understand how they have any reason to hold them. She was acquitted and they have no other suspect.
While the Commonwealth doesn't want to return Karen Read's phones to her, and they are filing motions to maintain possession of the phones.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:23 am to AlxTgr
Pretty surprised AJ hasn't obliterated them for the phone issue yet.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:24 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Pretty surprised AJ hasn't obliterated them for the phone issue yet.
Is AJ really working on any of this anymore? Pretty sure he has moved on to other cases.
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 11:25 am
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:31 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Is AJ really working on any of this anymore? Pretty sure he has moved on to other cases.
He has moved on but still works with her in some capacity - plus, this is part of "his" case I reckon. I watched a lot of his interviews post-trial and he's echoed the same.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:38 am to idlewatcher
Have been loosely following the civil part of this bc I’m interested in what happens if anything to the mcalberts etc.
I will say it’s such a cluster and I almost feel for the judge who has to preside over it. John’s family is suing Karen and like three bars. There is so much information coming into and out of the case, trying to deduce what’s considered redundant, admissible etc. Karen has also brought accusations against the McAlberts and Proctor. To be honest i have lost interest.
I will say it’s such a cluster and I almost feel for the judge who has to preside over it. John’s family is suing Karen and like three bars. There is so much information coming into and out of the case, trying to deduce what’s considered redundant, admissible etc. Karen has also brought accusations against the McAlberts and Proctor. To be honest i have lost interest.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:47 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
He has moved on but still works with her in some capacity
He is an attorney for the Civil lawsuits as well.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:05 am to 10tiger
I wonder what here auto limits are and if they have been offered.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:37 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
He is an attorney for the Civil lawsuits as well.
He is/was representing a young kid in Cali who was speeding and perhaps may have been drinking and killed another driver. Not sure if that case went to trial yet.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:52 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
He is/was representing a young kid in Cali who was speeding and perhaps may have been drinking and killed another driver. Not sure if that case went to trial yet.
I don't think that case has gone to trial, but Alan Jackson dropped off that case earlier this year.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:30 pm to civiltiger07
The house of cards may be starting to fall. There is a guy named Jim Sullivan that is speaking out. He was at one of the bars. He was on surveillance talking with John O’Keefe and Karen Read for an hour the night o’Keefe died.
After meeting with Micheal Proctor. Proctor wrote a report that claimed Sullivan told Proctor that Karen Read was “toasted”.
ADA Adam Lally said that the jury would hear from Jim Sullivan during the trial. Lally meet with Sullivan the day after the opening statement for the first time. When they got to Proctors report Sullivan informed both prosecutors (Lally and Mclaurin) and Tully that he never told Proctor that he said Karen Read was “Toasted”.
Sullivan was never called in either trial and Lally never informed Karen Reads lawyers about his meeting with Sullivan.
After meeting with Micheal Proctor. Proctor wrote a report that claimed Sullivan told Proctor that Karen Read was “toasted”.
ADA Adam Lally said that the jury would hear from Jim Sullivan during the trial. Lally meet with Sullivan the day after the opening statement for the first time. When they got to Proctors report Sullivan informed both prosecutors (Lally and Mclaurin) and Tully that he never told Proctor that he said Karen Read was “Toasted”.
Sullivan was never called in either trial and Lally never informed Karen Reads lawyers about his meeting with Sullivan.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 10:44 pm to civiltiger07
I’ve been following sporadically and I gotta say, those text messages between proctor and the other guys are morally repugnant. And not just about KR but other people as well. It really speaks to the whole systemic culture that not only did they feel comfortable talking like that but to write it and not think anything of it.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 10:49 pm to LSUGrrrl
Not knowing any details, but can't the lens be broken, yet the light still work?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:37 am to 10tiger
Proctor is an actual racist, misogynist, antisemite cop and you would think the national media would be all over this case.
Page 159 of 160
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News