Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

I’ve spent a few months in India (nice parts) and one thing strikes me

Posted on 8/15/26 at 4:12 am
Posted by VooDude
Member since Aug 2017
3576 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 4:12 am
Everyone seems to hate the British and they blame their colonizers for their lack of progress. But in fact, their lack of progress is because the British left after WW2 (basically Hitler made Britain go broke and lose its empire).

But before then, Britain built their entire infrastructure including ports and rail networks, and unified Indian under a common language. That and the partition would have never happened.

But what have the British ever done for US?
This post was edited on 8/15/26 at 4:30 am
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6990 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 4:19 am to
Pretty on-brand for third worlders. Blame the British who haven’t been in your country since 1945 for the fact that you have open high voltage electrical on every street corner and 50 people get run over by trains daily. Anyone who’s ever spent time around Indian people knows exactly why they’re one of the worst, dirtiest countries on earth and it ain’t because of a bunch of 110 year old British guys
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76121 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 4:28 am to
quote:

I’ve spent a few months in India (nice parts)
I’ll never first-handedly know whether there are any “nice parts” of the Indian subcontinent.

Ain’t nearly enough intriguing juice in visiting there worth my squeezing.

The vast majority of the Indians I’ve met in the rest of the world in my life so far do not make me wish to see millions of more folks like them.

Sorry George Harrison, wherever you are.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96234 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 5:16 am to
At least for Britain, their overseas colonial empire, while providing some degree of benefit for them (access to resources and manpower they might not have had otherwise), it was a net loss/cost for them and a net gain/benefit for virtually every place they "colonized".

And they're hated for it...
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10482 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 5:20 am to
quote:

Everyone seems to hate the British and they blame their colonizers for their lack of progress

Goes for Africa, and Jamaica too.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57424 posts
Posted on 8/15/26 at 5:40 am to
quote:

At least for Britain, their overseas colonial empire, while providing some degree of benefit for them (access to resources and manpower they might not have had otherwise), it was a net loss/cost for them and a net gain/benefit for virtually every place they "colonized".

And they're hated for it...

It was a great boon to Britain, and they made fortunes. Eventually it became a net loss because the colonized people were resisting.

It was so lucrative that the Dutch were run out of there by the British. Napoleon strongly considered an overland assault from Egypt, and Russia fought with the British for a hundred years to gain the approaches to India in Central Asia.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram