- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Im old. I hate kids nowaday. I hate NIL deals. Kids so soft nowadays.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:18 pm to gizmothepug
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:18 pm to gizmothepug
quote:
he difference is that college football is now semi-professional with the players having more freedom than NFL players.
You keep repeating it, but you can’t explain how
quote:
the sports media can’t just admit that college football isn’t what it was not even 10 years ago.
What an asinine statement
quote:
If the powers that be want college football to be a free for all without any rules, then go for it
The powers at be wanted to continue to be greedy as frick and wouldn’t even come to the table. And that’s why we’re at where we’re at. They were totally arrogant and incompetent and are somehow getting a total pass from most people. Its insane
quote:
admit the amateur athlete is a thing of the past.
Quite literally everyone has done this
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:26 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
You are not under contract with the university and can quit and or transfer to another school at anytime. You cannot play in that same season but it used to be you had to sit out the following season which kept many players from transferring.
Now NIL is a different animal and that depends only on how your NIL contact is structured and there is no specific regulated contract or even if you actually have to have a contract. Someone like Gordon could just tell a player he will pay him $100k and the player might agree. He would be a dumbass but who knows.
I think the transfer portal needs to revert back to sitting out a year or make it limited to one transfer.
And I have no problem with NIL per se if they can structure it for performance based or duration and have a universal set of rules to guide you.
Right now it is just the Wild West and that’s not good for college athletics or in the long run the athletes themselves.
Now NIL is a different animal and that depends only on how your NIL contact is structured and there is no specific regulated contract or even if you actually have to have a contract. Someone like Gordon could just tell a player he will pay him $100k and the player might agree. He would be a dumbass but who knows.
I think the transfer portal needs to revert back to sitting out a year or make it limited to one transfer.
And I have no problem with NIL per se if they can structure it for performance based or duration and have a universal set of rules to guide you.
Right now it is just the Wild West and that’s not good for college athletics or in the long run the athletes themselves.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:26 pm to SuckerPunch
quote:
Im damn proud to be alive in the 80s and 90s when real men played sports.
The time and effort D1 and especially D1 athletes in elite programs spend on their sport today dwarfs the time players put in in the 80s and 90s. The time spent on nutrition, conditioning, recovery, film etc is significantly higher. The game is faster and the athletes are stronger and faster than they were. This is not counting the time they spent just getting to the college level which for most is exponentially higher than in the distant past.
Those real men are crippled now.
The old days were fine when the only ones that cared who won the Harvard v Yale or Alabama v Auburn game were students, alumni and the players family. Now it is a multi-billion dollar industry that requires full time players rather than the in-season athletes of the past.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:45 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
he difference is that college football is now semi-professional with the players having more freedom than NFL players. You keep repeating it, but you can’t explain how
I’m pretty sure I did multiple times. Can a draft pick or someone that wasn’t even drafted who signs a contract do whatever he wants during or after the season? No, an NFL player can’t
do that. What’s so hard for you to understand about an NFL player not being to go to another team if he’s under contract? He doesn’t have to play, but if he’s under contract he isn’t playing with another NFL team unless his current team says so. That’s not the case for college players, who are getting paid and are under NO obligation to stay with a college team, and the college team can’t do anything about it.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:47 pm to SuckerPunch
Social media. It's not their fault. You would do the same thing in their position.
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:47 pm to gizmothepug
quote:
I’m pretty sure I did multiple times. Can a draft pick or someone that wasn’t even drafted who signs a contract do whatever he wants during or after the season? No, an NFL player can’t do that.
Nor can a college player
quote:
What’s so hard for you to understand about an NFL player not being to go to another team if he’s under contract?
What’s so hard to understand that a college player can’t either?
quote:
That’s not the case for college players
That’s PRECISELY the case for college players
Posted on 12/30/24 at 10:52 pm to BoogaBear
Do you think they keep their jobs if they’re lazy and don’t hustle?
Posted on 12/31/24 at 4:57 am to JohnnyKilroy
That's a fair question, given my somewhat rambling post...
Right now, a guy can play QB for a team, and negotiate a better deal after the regular season is over and tell his current team he's not playing in the bowl game/playoff game, etc b/c his new team told him he can't.
Currently, that is unrestricted movement.
It screws up coaching, recruiting, and post-season.
Well, we don't let pro players do it; they have contracts.
College players should be bound by similar contracts since obviously, they are professional players.
Honesty, NIL is a mess and will ultimately undermine college football and likely lower fan interest.
I understand the players want to be compensated, hell, it's their skills people are paying to see.
Just put contracts and restrictions in place just like every other professional sport.
Right now, a guy can play QB for a team, and negotiate a better deal after the regular season is over and tell his current team he's not playing in the bowl game/playoff game, etc b/c his new team told him he can't.
Currently, that is unrestricted movement.
It screws up coaching, recruiting, and post-season.
Well, we don't let pro players do it; they have contracts.
College players should be bound by similar contracts since obviously, they are professional players.
Honesty, NIL is a mess and will ultimately undermine college football and likely lower fan interest.
I understand the players want to be compensated, hell, it's their skills people are paying to see.
Just put contracts and restrictions in place just like every other professional sport.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 5:07 am to SuckerPunch
quote:
they are some soft, think everything should be handed to them on a silver platter, cant work ground level jobs and work ur way up.
The generation that had training and mentoring with cheap college and in many cases pensions doesn’t understand why kids that have to enter the workforce with expensive degrees and “experience” want to be compensated for it.
quote:
hate the current college football season as constructed
Me too. We killed the golden goose.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 6:09 am to SuckerPunch
quote:
Im old. I hate kids nowaday. I hate NIL deals. Kids so soft nowadays.
Obligatory

Posted on 12/31/24 at 6:20 am to gizmothepug
quote:
The difference is that college football is now semi-professional with the players having more freedom than NFL players. With all the tv rights, money, and especially gambling money involved it is what it is, but the sports media can’t just admit that college football isn’t what it was not even 10 years ago. If the powers that be want college football to be a free for all without any rules, then go for it, but at the same time just admit the amateur athlete is a thing of the past.
Almost the entirety of college football sports media are talking about it. What rock have you been hiding under? When they're not reporting on actual games, that is what they talk about.
Also, you're totally ignoring the fact that star players have been being paid for decades.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 6:26 am to gizmothepug
quote:
If the powers that be want college football to be a free for all without any rules, then go for it, but at the same time just admit the amateur athlete is a thing of the past.
If college football was ever about amateur athletics, it hasn't been in my lifetime.
The problem with college football is that it generates money like a pro sport, but it only does so because people have nostalgic emotional attachments to the school that the players are associated with.
If Auburn and Alabama, for example, became the West Vance Crimson Tide and the East Alabama Tigers and they played off campus somewhere and there was no association with the universities, you couldn't fill up a high school stadium with people to watch them. Same players, same coaches, same everything, except no association with the schools.
So college football has always been a minor league for the pros that generated money like the pros (what other farm league does that?) because it was associated with institutions of higher learning, and as such it always had to pretend to be something else.
I do not subscribe to the viewpoint that college athletes were ever "taken advantage of." They got the best nutrition and nutritional advice, they got professional training and coaching (how much do you think Nick Saban would have charged for in person coaching if he had been running a private camp?), they got tutors and handlers, and most importantly, they got t.v. exposure.
All of these things were invaluable for getting them to their goal, which was the pros. Literally invaluable...how much do you think it would have cost a player to buy himself 3 1/2 hours of national t.v. time to showcase his skills 10 times a season?
So they got compensated plenty already IMO.
That said, it's always been a professional farm league. I think that the NIL part hasn't been nearly as disruptive as the transfer portal part, and if they don't do something about that I think it will indeed end up ruining the game.
We're already at a place in which coaches are afraid to discipline players b/c if they get upset they will poke their bottom lip out, hold their breath, and transfer.
But more than that, imagine that every player in the NFL WAS on a 1 year contract. Imagine how destabilizing it would be.
It's unsustainable IMO.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 6:33 am to wackatimesthree
Well said, and my only add is that NIL has made the transfer portal more of a high-bidder situation.
I always thought it was a bit unfair to make a guy sit out a year, but now unrestricted movement is to me, the height of ridiculousness.
And you are absolutely spot-on with your third paragraph, and i think ultimately, NIL and unrestricted movement will dilute team associations with the fan base.
I always thought it was a bit unfair to make a guy sit out a year, but now unrestricted movement is to me, the height of ridiculousness.
And you are absolutely spot-on with your third paragraph, and i think ultimately, NIL and unrestricted movement will dilute team associations with the fan base.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:09 am to wackatimesthree
correct and if you went to everyone being true student athletes again....people would show up like crazy
i do not like the instant transfer thing and think there should be contracts
as far as the pay thing....i feel two different ways
1) NCAA is a volunteer org and i didnt feel like it was a monopoly. Kids could go play in canada or start their own league so i dont like the courts telling the NCAA what to do
but
2) Im not paying for the money they are getting so if someone else wants too fine but im not gonna give money for some 18 year old to make more than I do. If that means LSU sucks and I have to get use to that...so be it. I will never donate to that and I will be cancelling my subscriptions to all of the paid sites because its a waste now a days.
i dont really like the court ruling as I looked at this as a internship but they were getting 2-3k a month in stipend, free room & board, free nutritionist, free strength coach, free position coaching, full scholarship not to mention all the swag and other things and when you add alll that up its worth over 100k a year......well if that aint enough...well frick em.
but i digress and if someone else wants to pay them, fine but I wont be participating.
i do not like the instant transfer thing and think there should be contracts
as far as the pay thing....i feel two different ways
1) NCAA is a volunteer org and i didnt feel like it was a monopoly. Kids could go play in canada or start their own league so i dont like the courts telling the NCAA what to do
but
2) Im not paying for the money they are getting so if someone else wants too fine but im not gonna give money for some 18 year old to make more than I do. If that means LSU sucks and I have to get use to that...so be it. I will never donate to that and I will be cancelling my subscriptions to all of the paid sites because its a waste now a days.
i dont really like the court ruling as I looked at this as a internship but they were getting 2-3k a month in stipend, free room & board, free nutritionist, free strength coach, free position coaching, full scholarship not to mention all the swag and other things and when you add alll that up its worth over 100k a year......well if that aint enough...well frick em.
but i digress and if someone else wants to pay them, fine but I wont be participating.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:15 am to BoogaBear
quote:
Now kids see excelling at a sport as a payday, which means it's a job.
That went on when I was in high school, not that long ago. Well, that depends on how you define long ago. I went to high school in the late 70s.
Rumor then had it that Johnny Hector, from New Iberia, drove a brand new Trans Am to College Station to play for the Aggies in 1979. Oh well, you always miss a few.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:24 am to Martini
quote:
You are not under contract with the university and can quit and or transfer to another school at anytime.
So, like any other student.
BTW, OP is trolling. Hook too shiny.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:26 am to Sun God
quote:”Dickerson” is an ironic name for someone who’s a transvestite in the morning.
Can I post a pic of Eric Dickerson’s trans am
And no pics please.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:28 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
It's the logical result of the NCAA's stated principles. They're students first.
But all the highest paid football players aren’t actually student athletes.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:28 am to SuckerPunch
quote:
Im damn proud to be alive in the 80s and 90s when real men played sports.
Those pussies wore facemasks.
Back to top


1









