- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I sense the divide is growing
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:40 am
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:40 am
You have on one side those who agree with the measures that are being taken, see Covid-19 as a serious health issue for the nation, and want to save as many lives as possible.
On the other side you have those who see the measures being taken as an overreaction that is destroying the economy and costing too many people their jobs and business. Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly is acceptable damage to save the economic health of the nation.
Now that we’re into this a bit, where do you come down?
On the other side you have those who see the measures being taken as an overreaction that is destroying the economy and costing too many people their jobs and business. Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly is acceptable damage to save the economic health of the nation.
Now that we’re into this a bit, where do you come down?
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:41 am to High C
I'm all for whichever approach has JV ready for "opening day."
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:41 am to High C
Difference in R0 between total quarantine and what we have today does not justify the economic destruction that would ensue.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:42 am to High C
I was waiting for a bit opportunity in the market, so I am OK with this
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:42 am to High C
quote:I’d be fine with this but there’s a lot more to it
Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly is acceptable damage to save the economic health of the nation.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:42 am to High C
quote:
Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly
Elderly, cancer patients, people with asthma, young people with immune disorders. All expendable for muh small businesses.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:42 am to High C
Whatever gets rid of more liberals.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:43 am to High C
Good thing is We'll see what we see. My wife and I are pretty lonely out here in the country in my house on the lake. I'm going to keep fishing till the fish drop from Wuhan.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:43 am to High C
I think we should lay up for about a month so that we can prevent avoidable deaths by “flattening the curve”, but we have to ask whether any longer is worth mortgaging our economic future.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:45 am to High C
quote:
You have on one side those who agree with the measures that are being taken, see Covid-19 as a serious health issue for the nation, and want to save as many lives as possible.
On the other side you have those who see the measures being taken as an overreaction that is destroying the economy and costing too many people their jobs and business. Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly is acceptable damage to save the economic health of the nation.
Just being honest, we will need to find a happy medium. We cannot sustain the level of economic loss for more than, say 2-3 more weeks at most. At the same time, we cannot let this thing run rampant.
There has to be a compromise between acceptable losses in the economy and acceptable losses of life.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:45 am to Damone
quote:
Elderly, cancer patients, people with asthma, young people with immune disorders. All expendable for muh small businesses.
When it's like 1000 people vs 350million, yes.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:45 am to High C
quote:
On the other side you have those who see the measures being taken as an overreaction that is destroying the economy and costing too many people their jobs and business. Sacrificing a few unhealthy elderly is acceptable damage to save the economic health of the nation.
This is my side from the beginning and it is nice to see others joining that were not earlier.
By next week the only people supporting the drastic CV19 measures are the completely worthless.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:45 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
I was waiting for a bit opportunity in the market, so I am OK with this
Yeah, I mean, now that we (we being politicians who have zero skin in the game) have decided to tank the economy for this, I hope it stays down for a long time as I pour more money in at lower prices. I'm not worried about job security either, so hopefully it'll pay off down the road for me.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:46 am to High C
Being on the medical side of things, and I know the aggressiveness of the virus, I fall on the proper precautions side.
One way to slow it down.
There’s isn’t an overreaction when 4,000 people have died from something.
It’s easy to know that if these measures weren’t taken the numbers would be really high.
So anyone saying it’s an overreaction, well it really doesn’t matter what they say. Let them bitch and complain while we beat this pandemic.
One way to slow it down.
There’s isn’t an overreaction when 4,000 people have died from something.
It’s easy to know that if these measures weren’t taken the numbers would be really high.
So anyone saying it’s an overreaction, well it really doesn’t matter what they say. Let them bitch and complain while we beat this pandemic.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:46 am to High C
I’m in the middle, there are ideas in both groups you stated I agree with and some I disagree with.
Posted on 3/18/20 at 11:46 am to High C
I say shut everything down that's not essential right now for a month.
After that we've done our best. Everyone back to work and what happens happens.
After that we've done our best. Everyone back to work and what happens happens.
This post was edited on 3/18/20 at 11:47 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News