- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I have a friend that’s an honest to god 9/11 conspiracy theorist
Posted on 8/5/24 at 10:06 am to TX Tiger
Posted on 8/5/24 at 10:06 am to TX Tiger
quote:
What kind of moron pays $3.2 billion to lease a complex that needs another billion to extract the asbestos from it?
Silverstein wasn't even the initial high bid it was Vornado Reality Trust who outbid him with a $3.25 billion bid. Vornado tried to renegotiate the term length but the Port Authority wanted to be rid of managing the complex so they got Silverstein to come up in price.
3.25 billion is a steal for that much class A office space in Manhattan but the price reflected the below market leases in place, deferred maintenance by the PA and the large modernization project required across the entire complex.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 10:07 am to TX Tiger
quote:uhh you do understand they reported the collapse of building 7 20 minutes before it happened,but after it had been on fire for nearly an hour, not the actual attack itself right? The “early” report was 7 or 8 hours after the planes hit the towers
Yes, reporting on national television an event that's never happened in the history of man before that day, is a common error. Happens all the time.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 10:11 am to Globetrotter747
Believing that the cia isn’t capable of murdering a political candidate when it’s been done since the beginning of society makes someone far more gullible than one who thinks it’s possible they tried to take Trump out.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 10:46 am to TX Tiger
quote:
No, but what I do know is that this SOB made billions
He did? Link?
shite by my count he and his group are 11 figures in the hole on this shite.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:27 am to Hayekian serf
quote:
they tried to take Trump out.
A kooky thread about a kooky friend has brought all the kooks out about
kooky people and things
Is the great pumpkins arrival midnight eastern time or local time??.....thanks in advance
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:55 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Yes, reporting on national television an event that's never happened in the history of man before that day, is a common error. Happens all the time.
If you're planning (and executing) one of the greatest conspiracies a government has ever carried out on its people why would you let some jackass reporter with a foreign news outlet who has a direct line to the general public in on the plan?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:37 pm to LegendInMyMind
Just don’t think about it and it makes more sense
Posted on 8/5/24 at 12:44 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
CN someone help me explain to this moron how the towers went down, he believes jet fuel can’t melt steel beams
It would help if we knew how many times you’ve been vaxxed + boosted
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:50 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
But in reality he just made a mistake in a very tense situation
The report I am talking about is a woman. And it's been taken off of YouTube
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:30 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
The report I am talking about is a woman. And it's been taken off of YouTube
It hasn't been taken off of YouTube. It is still out there.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
Richard Porter, a senior editor within the BBC’s global service at the time of the attack, published a blog in 2007 detailing how the mistake could have been made during live reporting.
He highlighted the fact that American broadcaster CNN had reported that the building was on fire and in danger of collapse as early as 4.15pm, with other local channels making similar claims. Mr Porter also pointed to the fact that several other BBC services had run similar lines about a large building having collapsed. He suggested this meant it was likely at least one news agency was reporting this as fact at the time, or reporting someone having claimed this.
He also wrote: “We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.
“In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.
“If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that.”
He highlighted the fact that American broadcaster CNN had reported that the building was on fire and in danger of collapse as early as 4.15pm, with other local channels making similar claims. Mr Porter also pointed to the fact that several other BBC services had run similar lines about a large building having collapsed. He suggested this meant it was likely at least one news agency was reporting this as fact at the time, or reporting someone having claimed this.
He also wrote: “We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.
“In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.
“If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that.”
Posted on 8/5/24 at 5:16 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
As someone that is tangentially (sometimes specifically) involved in structural accident investigations this thread is great. I've learned so much. 
Posted on 8/6/24 at 7:18 pm to junkfunky
Yesterday I was following along with this thread and decided to go to YouTube and watch a free movie (with ads).
Not knowing what the movie was about I selected one. Watched a few minutes because I was at work and decided to finish it when I got home.
Anyone who is NOT questioning 9/11 and other Government actions needs to watch it..."Fair Game". It's so good I wasn't annoyed Sean Penn was in it.
Oh...and its based on a true story...many on the Political Board will remember it well.
Not knowing what the movie was about I selected one. Watched a few minutes because I was at work and decided to finish it when I got home.
Anyone who is NOT questioning 9/11 and other Government actions needs to watch it..."Fair Game". It's so good I wasn't annoyed Sean Penn was in it.
Oh...and its based on a true story...many on the Political Board will remember it well.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 7:30 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
many on the Political Board will remember it well.
Thanks for the warning, no way I’m jumping in a rabbit hole.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 8:04 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
Your friend needs better friends
Posted on 8/6/24 at 8:16 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
Oh...and its based on a true story...
Was it about 9/11?
I think most of us can acknowledge that the government is fricked up about some stuff. But it’s still funny how most everyone agrees that the government is very screwed up, but still some think they can pull off amazing stunts that the public is kept in the secret about:
Posted on 8/7/24 at 3:04 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
kooky thread about a kooky friend
I’m willing to bet you trusted the experts during Covid
This post was edited on 8/7/24 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 8/7/24 at 3:22 pm to Globetrotter747
quote:
A lot of people here think the government just tried to assassinate Trump. I would look somewhere else for a voice of reason.
While others think the government gives a shite about you.
Posted on 8/7/24 at 4:19 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:Just to clarify, "the government" didn't carry out 9/11. Very powerful, well-connected people did. How many of them were/are part of the government is anyone's guess.
If you're planning (and executing) one of the greatest conspiracies a government has ever carried out
What the government did do, in cooperation with the media, is lie to us about it.
quote:Reporters read scripts that are handed to them. They're not "in" on anything.
why would you let some jackass reporter with a foreign news outlet who has a direct line to the general public in on the plan?
Popular
Back to top


0




