Started By
Message

re: Help with riddle - How Much Money Did The Store Lose?

Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:43 pm to
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:43 pm to
Subtle 'I have a job' brag
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8846 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

How much money did the store lose?


Since he gave the $100 back and the question is how much money it lost, I’d say the $30 in change they gave him. The $70 is goods stolen not money.
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15321 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:50 pm to
Unless his moms a Dr. then its an easy answer of $100
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90657 posts
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

A man steals a $100 bill from a store’s cash register. Then he buys $70 worth of goods at the store using the $100 he stole and he gets $30 in change back. How much money did the store lose?


Depends what the markup on the goods he bought is. Value of goods bought by stolen money to the store is wholesale value since they retain the profit on the goods from the sale. Assume markup of 10%

63 dollars wholesale value of goods plus 30 in change, 93 dollars stolen. They kept the 7 dollar profit. But this is only if you know the guy who stole it bought goods with stolen money. If you don’t know these facts, it’s no different than if he stole 100 dollars and another customer came in and bought the same goods with a non stolen 100 dollar bill.

At the end of the day the cash register balance will be short 100 dollars
This post was edited on 12/10/23 at 11:55 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50526 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:01 am to
quote:

The $70 is goods stolen not money.


They didn't get those goods for free.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17193 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:08 am to
70 in goods and 30 in cash = 100 net loss. He put the 100 back so it's immaterial to the query.
Posted by adamau
Member since Oct 2020
3507 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 12:17 am to
The thief walked away with $70 bucks worth of retail stuff and $30 cash while giving the store nothing.

The Store had $70 worth of retail goods and $30 worth of cash removed from it while getting nothing in return.



Posted by madamsquirrel
The Snarlington Estate
Member since Jul 2009
48623 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 3:38 am to
quote:

From an accounting perspective, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen. From a legal perspective, $100 total worth of cash and merchandise.
this was also my answer
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48945 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 3:49 am to
The stores ESG score went up for not opposing the unplanned donation, thereby Blackrock lowered the rent on the owners house by 100 a month.

Its a sctatch.
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8215 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 5:42 am to
Store lost 100

Then trades 70 for 100, so the store has now lost 70

Then gives back 30, so 70+30 = 100
Posted by TJack
BR
Member since Dec 2018
1320 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:26 am to
The correct answer is $500 for insurance claim purposes.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
10511 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 6:47 am to
The horses name is Friday
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6814 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:01 am to
quote:

From an accounting perspective, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen. From a legal perspective, $100 total worth of cash and merchandise.


This plus 5 in labor for stocking and check out paid from money they already had in hand. Unless he used self checkout.
Posted by saintsfan225
Member since Aug 2014
174 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:02 am to
The store lost $300.00.
1) The store lost the original $100 in cash
2) The store lost $70 worth of goods that was paid with the stolen money; therefore the store will not be able to sell the $70 worth of goods to someone that did not steal from them
3) The store then gave the thief $30 on top of that.
4) The store also has to re stock the $70.00 worth of items that the thief paid for with the stolen money.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 7:08 am
Posted by Naked Bootleg
Member since Jul 2021
1834 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:04 am to
$170

More or less, depending on their cost of goods stolen
Posted by HangmanPage1
Wild West
Member since Aug 2021
1385 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:07 am to
Nothing, it was reparations
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12905 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:08 am to
$130

+100
-70
+70
+30
----
130
quote:

Whether the cost of goods sold should be considered has been then point of contention.
The phrasing of question was $70 worth of good. Cost and markup should not be considered.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 7:12 am
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47507 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:31 am to
quote:

, $30 plus the store’s cost of the item stolen


COGS has a new meaning
Posted by Furious
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2023
194 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:35 am to
Not enough info. Need to know the store’s cost of goods.

Without knowing that. The guy steals $100, gives $100 back, but receives $70 in goods plus $30.

The guy stole $100 overall, but the store lost the cost of goods plus $30, so in reality, it is somewhere less than $100.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 1:21 pm
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17484 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 7:41 am to
1. Stole $100. $100 lost.

2. With a retail 30% markup on goods for resale, purchased wholesale, $70 stolen dollars are used to purchase goods with a $21 markup and a wholesale cost of $49, totaling $70. $70 lost.

$170 loss
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram