Started By
Message

re: Every developed country has high speed rail, why are so many against it in the U.S.?

Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
35414 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:54 pm to
If any mass transit system was a good idea, billionaires would be knifing each other in the back to build them. They are nothing but a money pit and waste of taxpayers dollars.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
68670 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
rail seems ancient...im waiting for jet packs
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68362 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
1. Most of our urban centers are too far apart from one another for hsr to be more efficient than airlines.

2. Hsr is bankrupting China right now.

3. We have a unique federal regulatory scheme surrounding our rail network that disadvantages passenger rail by prioritizing freight. Basically, the government can’t say shite to freight rail, they have no competition, and they have no necessity to move anything faster.
Posted by LoneStarTiger
Lone Star State
Member since Aug 2004
16214 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
because we value private property rights
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
2250 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
There’s a conflation between rail with a city and rail between cities that I don’t really agree with.

I do think there needs to be more rail within a city to get people to their jobs.

But something like Brightline here in Florida (the closest thing to high speed rail in the US that I’m aware of)- eh, I don’t really see why we need a fast railroad to take you from Miami or Fort Lauderdale to your Orlando vacation. If you can’t afford the gas for that car trip, then you can just skip the vacation. And if you can’t afford the price of gas for that car trip, I’m not sure how you’re going to afford the hotel room anyway.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 1:56 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28561 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Every developed country has high speed rail, why are so many against it in the U.S.?




I'll have to pay for it to get built by our wasteful gov't.
If I decide to use it, i'll have to pay to use it.
If I decide to use it, i'll have to ride with people i don't want to be around, and I'll be paying for them to ride too.
Those people I don't want to be around, will inevitably be the majority of riders and eventually make it unsafe for the average law abiding american on top of being disgusting to ride on.


That's why.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
14255 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:55 pm to
Many large cities outside of the south at least have major subways or rail type transportation.

It still baffles me the south refuses to adopt good or even decent means of public transit. Mamma doesn’t want to give up that $95,000 Hummer to drive Coltyn to travel ball practice.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
21076 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:56 pm to
For the same reason that Australia doesn't.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
34599 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:56 pm to
Not sure we have the trustable society that the other civilized countries do

If when asked for a ticket , our citizens will label the workers racist or sling piss at them or something

Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
18995 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:56 pm to
They are trying to build one in California, and it is going exactly as expected. The Guardian
quote:

Originally the whole 494-mile route – stretching south beyond Los Angeles to Anaheim, home to Disneyland – was supposed to be finished by 2020, at a cost of around $30bn. Now, the state’s high-speed rail authority is refocusing its ambitions on a truncated 171-mile middle section in California’s Central valley, at a cost of more than $35bn and a tentative completion date of 2033. The budget for the entire line has ballooned to more than $100bn, with no end date in sight.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
2908 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I think high speed rail would work great in the DFW/Houston/San Antonio triangle.


One through the southeast to Texas is a no brainer. Same for the Northeast and from San Jose to Seattle.

It doesn’t need to connect nation wide but having the regions connected is a no brainer.

This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 2:06 pm
Posted by LSU1SLU
Member since Mar 2013
7671 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:58 pm to
quote:



Imagine THIS on rails and on a national level:





such a small world way of thinking. Couldnt imagine living in Louisiana my whole life and not realizing every other city looks different and is different.
Posted by MizunoDude
Member since May 2020
984 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:58 pm to
Because Americans(Real Americans) like driving cars. Big trucks, Classic fossil fuel burning cars and Luxury sedans.

High speed rail is the camel's nose in the tent for the communists. With rails, we don't need as many roads or individual cars for travel.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14210 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:59 pm to
Thanks for showing us the railways we built in Europe after we won both their wars for them.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
81779 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 1:59 pm to
bc indigenous people didn't have access to railways back in 1492 so we shouldn't be able to have it here either
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
1808 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Because Americans(Real Americans) like driving cars. Big trucks, Classic fossil fuel burning cars and Luxury sedans. High speed rail is the camel's nose in the tent for the communists. With rails, we don't need as many roads or individual cars for travel.


The vast majority of cars are going to be fully self driving eventually. Probably within most of our lifetimes. Probably mostly electric too but we’ll see how well that technology develops. We’ll all be a lot safer for it too.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
40406 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Because riding a train is gay compared to taking your own vehicle or flying.


Sad but true.
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
1948 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:01 pm to
Have you ever been to the northeast?





Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
69053 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

One through the southeast to Texas is a no brainer.


What would make this viable? Who would ride it?

New orleans to Atlanta would stay packed but otherwise I don't see cross country passenger rail ever catching on here.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58728 posts
Posted on 3/25/25 at 2:01 pm to
From a guy old enough to remember rail travel in the US, it was awesome

Real food cooked on the train, not made weeks earlier and nuked on a plane

Merican
Seats for poor folks
Rooms for middle class
Private cars for rich folks

They all had access to ...
Dining Car
Bar Car
Observation Car

Good seating
No social media so folks interacted for 2 - 3 days as you crossed the US

Service unheard of in todays world
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram