Started By
Message

re: Could a modern supercar complete a 500 mile Nascar oval race?

Posted on 12/9/18 at 10:58 pm to
Posted by justausedcarguy
Member since Aug 2014
5642 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 10:58 pm to
Yes, most supercars have some type of dry sump oiling system, but if you are talking about running 500 miles on a large, highbanked oval they would eventually have oiling problems. A nascar engines oiling system is different even from a road course to a oval. On an oval the scavenges in the oil pan are placed to account for the centrifugal force and they also run as many as 5 scavenges on an oval. If you were talking about running on a road course I wouldn’t imagine there being any problems.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
3337 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:03 pm to
There would be a massive difference in fuel consumption between it's top speed and a steady 180mph run. The HP needed would probably double between those 2 speeds. But again, we are talking fuel which is easily overcome.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85495 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Push rod V8's making 800hp(ish) in a steel frame car weighing over 3000lb


I don’t know a lot about this stuff. Are pushrods still used bc they are sturdy and reliable? Are the cars steel and heavy for safety?
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
3337 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:19 pm to
NASCAR is not a "prototype" racing series. The rules are designed to spur competition, not innovation.
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
9387 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

NASCAR is not a "prototype" racing series. The rules are designed to spur competition, not innovation.


Correct.

But supercars are not built for the NASCAR circuit, either. They would wipe the floor at the road courses on pace alone, but your average oval track, no way.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41812 posts
Posted on 12/9/18 at 11:58 pm to
Cale at Le Mans

Still one of the best Sports Illustrated articles I ever read.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41970 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:11 am to
I can see a GT3 doing it as Porsche build quality is superb as other super car manufactures have issues with overheating and catching fire. A street car isn't made for that level of flat out endurance driving and would need some tweaks.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 1:16 am
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:21 am to
quote:

Not at wide open throttle


That wasn't the question you posted. You asked "could a modern supercar complete a 500 mile Nascar oval race" and the answer is clearly yes.

I'm assuming that one would not be competitive, since otherwise the major race teams would simply buy a supercar and run it. But the question is completion, not competitiveness.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 1:24 am
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:21 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 1:22 am
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
109161 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 1:43 am to
That was a fantastic read.
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
2068 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 5:58 am to
quote:

I don't think some of you realize how "low-tech" NASCAR is.


100% false.

I sat at a table with a team of engineers from Mahle- you know, the guys that make pistons for Nascar, Formula 1, and things like that.

Mind you, this was in the Ferrari suite at the inaugural F1 race in Austin a few years ago. I commented to them, “I bet it’s really a challenge for you guys to work on these really small, high rev engines with all the rules that F1 has.”. Their lead guys response, “Nascar is the worst for all of us- the rules are so restrictive, the advanced engineering that goes into something that looks normal, but is actually not, is mind numbing”.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:06 am to
quote:

could it run flat out for that long


From the OP
Posted by s14suspense
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
16152 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:20 am to
quote:

180-200mph isn’t like you driving on the interstate for hours at 75.



Not all interstates are 75...
Posted by s14suspense
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
16152 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:23 am to
quote:

They'd have to refuel too often to be competitive



???
I would bet they'd get better fuel mileage.

Given the same size fuel tank as what a Nascar has and Racing slicks I think a 720S, GT2 RS, Ford GT would lap the pack.



Yep, supercar manufacturers have no experience in anything oval...

This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 6:52 am
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
30426 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:42 am to
That thing might fall apart at a bumpy track like Atlanta.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:48 am to
quote:

The supercars would eat up tires much more quickly than purpose-built race cars. They would also have to stop for fuel all the time. It would also require more lengthy pit stops than NASCAR teams pump out.

i came here to post 2 wors

tires
fuel

your post is 100% correct. there are other issues but these 2 would destroy the supercar

*ETA: those supercars eat up their tires in like 10 minutes of flat out throttle
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 6:50 am
Posted by s14suspense
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
16152 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 6:54 am to
quote:

ETA: those supercars eat up their tires in like 10 minutes of flat out throttle


No they don’t. That’s a 10 year old stat for the Bugatti @250+ MPH on original Michelin Pilot sport cups. They’re 3 generations past that tire now and these cars wouldn’t be using street tires on a race track.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22313 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Say like an Aventador or Bugatti Chiron or LaFerrari. It wouldn’t win, but could it run flat out for that long without the motor blowing? Assuming normal pit stops for fuel and tires.


I think people forgot the orginal question.

Yeah, it seems like they could survive it. The 24 hour races are dang hard on race cars and many of those are very close to stock. Sure, not all cars survive but I think most make it past the 500 mile mark before cratering.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16797 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Yeah, it seems like they could survive it. The 24 hour races are dang hard on race cars and many of those are very close to stock. Sure, not all cars survive but I think most make it past the 500 mile mark before cratering


Road courses aren't big ovals though, they aren't pushing the extreme the entire lap.

NASCAR's that are purpose built for these lengths of races have issue completing it. Wouldn't want to test it with a supercar that was mine that is for sure.

Show piece supercars really aren't meant to be driven much, they become expensive paper weights with very little miles.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 8:14 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117101 posts
Posted on 12/10/18 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Cale at Le Mans

Still one of the best Sports Illustrated articles I ever read


That was a great read.

Back when NASCAR was NASCAR
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram