Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 7/18/20 at 7:33 pm to
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 7/18/20 at 7:33 pm to
Hang in there. I really think we are going to get a little break here for a few months after these waves in the border states die down some.

quote:

So Wawe are you going to take a vaccine when it comes out??? Just curious.


I absolutely would. I’m not afraid of vaccines and this one is pretty straight forward. It will probably be required anyway for most physicians.
Posted by TommyDaTiger
Nawlins
Member since Dec 2015
11286 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 1:51 am to
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3577 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:40 am to
Has anyone seen anything published indicating certain blood types are at a greater risk with Covid 19??


I had a friend saying they recently read something to that effect.... not sure I am buying into that. I have not seen anything in print indicating that...

Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105316 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 10:06 am to
Oxford vaccine triggers antibody and T cell response LINK
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9924 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:27 am to
Pretty sure this is a case of playing with the data until you see what you want to see, but interesting nonetheless.



https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-deaths-daily-vs-total-per-million?country=~USA
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9425 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:59 am to
Seems like "United States" covers the most important part of the graph.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 12:53 pm to
Inhaled Interferon Beta May be the next COVID treatment breakthrough


quote:

The treatment from Southampton-based biotech Synairgen uses a protein called interferon beta which the body produces when it gets a viral infection. The protein is inhaled directly into the lungs of patients with coronavirus, using a nebuliser, in the hope that it will stimulate an immune response. The initial findings suggest the treatment cut the odds of a Covid-19 patient in hospital developing severe disease - such as requiring ventilation - by 79%. Patients were two to three times more likely to recover to the point where everyday activities were not compromised by their illness, Synairgen claims. It said the trial also indicated "very significant" reductions in breathlessness among patients who received the treatment. In addition, the average time patients spent in hospital is said to have been reduced by a third, for those receiving the new drug - down from an average of nine days to six days.
This post was edited on 7/20/20 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25919 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 12:55 pm to
Is this owned by Gilead? Does it cost thousands of dollars per treatment?

If not, I doubt it gets much traction here. Ha.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25919 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 3:34 pm to


Situation may be starting to improve in SC. Note, there has been no rollback of openings except that bars have to stop serving at 11pm and the masks mandates.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55601 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

So how did five nurses who worked the covid unit not get it where I do consulting and only 1 did?
Same reason only 20% on the Diamond Princess got it?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55601 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

Has anyone seen anything published indicating certain blood types are at a greater risk with Covid 19??

Yes. I think type O is less affected, because my wife has been taunting me about that.
Posted by bbrownso
Member since Mar 2008
8985 posts
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:46 pm to
SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls

First a note:
quote:

This is an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Nature Research are providing this early version of the manuscript as a service to our authors and readers. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting and a proof review before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.


Abstract (interesting part):
quote:

Memory T cells induced by previous pathogens can shape the susceptibility to, and clinical severity of, subsequent infections1. Little is known about the presence of pre-existing memory T cells in humans with the potential to recognize SARS-CoV-2. Here, we first studied T cell responses to structural (nucleocapsid protein, NP) and non-structural (NSP-7 and NSP13 of ORF1) regions of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 convalescents (n=36). In all of them we demonstrated the presence of CD4 and CD8 T cells recognizing multiple regions of the NP protein. We then showed that SARS-recovered patients (n=23) still possess long-lasting memory T cells reactive to SARS-NP 17 years after the 2003 outbreak, which displayed robust cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 NP.


Not much there but hopefully we'll see a full article peer-reviewed relatively soon.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11821 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 12:54 am to
Twitter Thread

Thread with discussion and articles on antibodies not lasting.

Basically, doesn’t matter if they don’t show for long. We will still have immunity. Also, vaccines can and do create stronger immunity than really catching it.
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9924 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Same reason only 20% on the Diamond Princess got it?



Will be interesting to see if they will ever be able to understand if certain groups already had immunity based on previous vaccines and/or exposure to other viruses. There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.


Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.
This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25919 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

quote:

There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.

This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.


It's very correlative, but it is an idea out there. Folks from Tulane and LSU Health actually had a paper published concerning potentially using MMR vaccines as a cheap stop-gap for poor nations or something.

Think there may have been European research out there on the topic a while back too. Looked at age cohorts affected and a country's MMR vaccine policy.

Belgium was late to the requiring MMR vaccinations party, and they've had bad results in more age groups, if I recall.

But...the requirements went into effect like 40 years ago most places, so people under 50 would be the ones "protected" by it...but those are also the younger age groups that should have better outcomes regardless. But Belgium's late policy sort of points to it actually being a thing.


Something about SARS 2.0 and Rubella in particular having similar proteins(?), I believe, is the thinking.




Here's my post about the Tulane/LSU paper, with a link, from this thread a month ago.



Here's the paper looking at the other part of things regarding age groups.
This post was edited on 7/21/20 at 2:22 pm
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.


It actually has a decent hypothesis behind it. If you look into the similar protein domains.

My own personal opinion for the strong correlation with age is due to T cell function decreasing with age. Those T cells which would help with cross reactivity from other coronaviruses just aren’t as effective in the elderly. But that’s just my opinion.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3206 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:02 pm to
WaWaWeeWa,

Would AIDS patients be a good test of this theory? That should provide low T-cell counts in younger patients (the majority of whom share a passion for either interior design or heroin use in the US, which may provide another avenue to find a statistical correlation).

In places like Africa, the average age skews a lot younger, but that’s in part because they die of AIDS...so is average T-cell functionality the same there as it is here?



Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7601 posts
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

theres a lot of misinformation about vaccines these days.
If vaccines are available very early in 2021 what used to be misinformation may no longer be misinformation. Safety requires a large clinical trial for six months or longer. I would pass on a vaccine if it is available in the first quarter of next year.
first pageprev pagePage 1162 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram