- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***
Posted on 7/18/20 at 7:33 pm to tiger91
Posted on 7/18/20 at 7:33 pm to tiger91
Hang in there. I really think we are going to get a little break here for a few months after these waves in the border states die down some.
I absolutely would. I’m not afraid of vaccines and this one is pretty straight forward. It will probably be required anyway for most physicians.
quote:
So Wawe are you going to take a vaccine when it comes out??? Just curious.
I absolutely would. I’m not afraid of vaccines and this one is pretty straight forward. It will probably be required anyway for most physicians.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:40 am to TommyDaTiger
Has anyone seen anything published indicating certain blood types are at a greater risk with Covid 19??
I had a friend saying they recently read something to that effect.... not sure I am buying into that. I have not seen anything in print indicating that...
I had a friend saying they recently read something to that effect.... not sure I am buying into that. I have not seen anything in print indicating that...
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:27 am to Jim Rockford
Pretty sure this is a case of playing with the data until you see what you want to see, but interesting nonetheless.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-deaths-daily-vs-total-per-million?country=~USA
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-deaths-daily-vs-total-per-million?country=~USA
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:59 am to Kingpenm3
Seems like "United States" covers the most important part of the graph.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 12:53 pm to wm72
Inhaled Interferon Beta May be the next COVID treatment breakthrough
quote:
The treatment from Southampton-based biotech Synairgen uses a protein called interferon beta which the body produces when it gets a viral infection. The protein is inhaled directly into the lungs of patients with coronavirus, using a nebuliser, in the hope that it will stimulate an immune response. The initial findings suggest the treatment cut the odds of a Covid-19 patient in hospital developing severe disease - such as requiring ventilation - by 79%. Patients were two to three times more likely to recover to the point where everyday activities were not compromised by their illness, Synairgen claims. It said the trial also indicated "very significant" reductions in breathlessness among patients who received the treatment. In addition, the average time patients spent in hospital is said to have been reduced by a third, for those receiving the new drug - down from an average of nine days to six days.
This post was edited on 7/20/20 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 7/20/20 at 12:55 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Is this owned by Gilead? Does it cost thousands of dollars per treatment?
If not, I doubt it gets much traction here. Ha.
If not, I doubt it gets much traction here. Ha.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 1:01 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Posted on 7/20/20 at 3:34 pm to Sasquatch Smash
Situation may be starting to improve in SC. Note, there has been no rollback of openings except that bars have to stop serving at 11pm and the masks mandates.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:29 pm to tiger91
quote:Same reason only 20% on the Diamond Princess got it?
So how did five nurses who worked the covid unit not get it where I do consulting and only 1 did?
Posted on 7/20/20 at 9:31 pm to klrstix
quote:
Has anyone seen anything published indicating certain blood types are at a greater risk with Covid 19??
Yes. I think type O is less affected, because my wife has been taunting me about that.
Posted on 7/20/20 at 11:46 pm to Penrod
SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls
First a note:
Abstract (interesting part):
Not much there but hopefully we'll see a full article peer-reviewed relatively soon.
First a note:
quote:
This is an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Nature Research are providing this early version of the manuscript as a service to our authors and readers. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting and a proof review before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Abstract (interesting part):
quote:
Memory T cells induced by previous pathogens can shape the susceptibility to, and clinical severity of, subsequent infections1. Little is known about the presence of pre-existing memory T cells in humans with the potential to recognize SARS-CoV-2. Here, we first studied T cell responses to structural (nucleocapsid protein, NP) and non-structural (NSP-7 and NSP13 of ORF1) regions of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 convalescents (n=36). In all of them we demonstrated the presence of CD4 and CD8 T cells recognizing multiple regions of the NP protein. We then showed that SARS-recovered patients (n=23) still possess long-lasting memory T cells reactive to SARS-NP 17 years after the 2003 outbreak, which displayed robust cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 NP.
Not much there but hopefully we'll see a full article peer-reviewed relatively soon.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 12:54 am to bbrownso
Twitter Thread
Thread with discussion and articles on antibodies not lasting.
Basically, doesn’t matter if they don’t show for long. We will still have immunity. Also, vaccines can and do create stronger immunity than really catching it.
Thread with discussion and articles on antibodies not lasting.
Basically, doesn’t matter if they don’t show for long. We will still have immunity. Also, vaccines can and do create stronger immunity than really catching it.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:26 am to Penrod
quote:
Same reason only 20% on the Diamond Princess got it?
Will be interesting to see if they will ever be able to understand if certain groups already had immunity based on previous vaccines and/or exposure to other viruses. There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:04 pm to Kingpenm3
quote:This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.
There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:15 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:quote:
There is already a theory based on the timing of widespread MMR vaccination that would explain why the elderly are being hit so hard.
This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.
It's very correlative, but it is an idea out there. Folks from Tulane and LSU Health actually had a paper published concerning potentially using MMR vaccines as a cheap stop-gap for poor nations or something.
Think there may have been European research out there on the topic a while back too. Looked at age cohorts affected and a country's MMR vaccine policy.
Belgium was late to the requiring MMR vaccinations party, and they've had bad results in more age groups, if I recall.
But...the requirements went into effect like 40 years ago most places, so people under 50 would be the ones "protected" by it...but those are also the younger age groups that should have better outcomes regardless. But Belgium's late policy sort of points to it actually being a thing.
Something about SARS 2.0 and Rubella in particular having similar proteins(?), I believe, is the thinking.
Here's my post about the Tulane/LSU paper, with a link, from this thread a month ago.
Here's the paper looking at the other part of things regarding age groups.
This post was edited on 7/21/20 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 7/21/20 at 2:24 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
This sounds like nonsense, at least from your brief description.
It actually has a decent hypothesis behind it. If you look into the similar protein domains.
My own personal opinion for the strong correlation with age is due to T cell function decreasing with age. Those T cells which would help with cross reactivity from other coronaviruses just aren’t as effective in the elderly. But that’s just my opinion.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 3:02 pm to WaWaWeeWa
WaWaWeeWa,
Would AIDS patients be a good test of this theory? That should provide low T-cell counts in younger patients (the majority of whom share a passion for either interior design or heroin use in the US, which may provide another avenue to find a statistical correlation).
In places like Africa, the average age skews a lot younger, but that’s in part because they die of AIDS...so is average T-cell functionality the same there as it is here?
Would AIDS patients be a good test of this theory? That should provide low T-cell counts in younger patients (the majority of whom share a passion for either interior design or heroin use in the US, which may provide another avenue to find a statistical correlation).
In places like Africa, the average age skews a lot younger, but that’s in part because they die of AIDS...so is average T-cell functionality the same there as it is here?
Posted on 7/21/20 at 4:04 pm to heatom2
quote:If vaccines are available very early in 2021 what used to be misinformation may no longer be misinformation. Safety requires a large clinical trial for six months or longer. I would pass on a vaccine if it is available in the first quarter of next year.
theres a lot of misinformation about vaccines these days.
Popular
Back to top


2






