Favorite team:McNeese State 
Location:Xanadu
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:9982
Registered on:8/16/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Swyft Fiber

Posted by Kingpenm3 on 8/31/26 at 1:49 pm to
I went from Starlink to Swyft about a year ago. It's been great. Very reliable, and a step faster than starlink.
quote:

Ummmm... McDonalds may not be the best example when talking about real meat....



Not a single steak is getting imported.

quote:

How it is used and mixed

U.S. packers have done this for years. They take fatty trimmings from U.S. fed cattle and blend them with very lean imported trim until they hit the fat target (80/20, 85/15, etc.). That is how most commercial ground beef is made.
The White House explicitly limited this quota to lean trim “to combine with U.S. beef for ground beef” and said it is meant to compete with the cull-cow market (old dairy/beef cows that also produce lean trim), not the fed-cattle market.


All of it is making ground meat.
quote:

Questions for O&G folks. Each Starship launch will consume about 4,500 metric tons of methane. Projected 30 launches per week will require about 135,000 metric tons of methane.

How much natural gas does it take to produce that amount of methane and how does that compare with our current Louisiana natural gas production?


Roughly 1,000–1,300 metric tons of methane (CH4) per Starship launch (not 4,500), so ~55–65 million standard cubic feet (MMscf) of natural gas equivalent per launch after accounting for liquefaction. At 30 launches/week that is on the order of 0.24–0.28 Bcf/d—material but still only a few percent of Louisiana’s current natural gas production.
Methane per launch
Starship + Super Heavy uses methalox (liquid methane + liquid oxygen) at roughly a 3.6:1 O2:CH4 mass ratio. Total propellant is in the ~4,600–5,250 metric ton range depending on the version/block:

Typical published breakdowns put methane at ~1,000–1,300 metric tons per full stack (older figures nearer 1,000–1,100 t; some V3-oriented estimates around 1,140 t).
The user’s 4,500 t figure is closer to total propellant mass (or total propellant + some margin), not the methane portion alone.

Natural gas is mostly methane. Converting liquid methane mass to pipeline gas volume yields ~50–62 MMscf of CH4 per launch. Industry analyses that include liquefaction energy/losses commonly use ~55 MMscf of natural gas per launch.
Scaled demand at 30 launches/week

30 launches/week ˜ 4.3 launches/day.
At ~55 MMscf/launch ? ~0.24 Bcf/d.
Using the higher ~62–65 MMscf end ? roughly 0.26–0.28 Bcf/d.

(For context, longer-term SpaceX ambitions of thousands of flights per year would push this into the 1+ Bcf/d range, comparable to a mid-sized LNG train, but 30/week is still modest.)
Comparison to Louisiana natural gas production
Louisiana state (onshore + state waters, excluding most federal OCS) production has been running in the ~3.6–3.8 Tcf/year range recently:

2025: ~3.77 Tcf (up modestly from 2024), driven overwhelmingly by the Haynesville Shale in northwest Louisiana.
That equates to roughly 10–10.5 Bcf/d on average.

Haynesville production itself (which straddles Louisiana and East Texas) has been in the mid-teens Bcf/d recently. Louisiana is a major gas state and a key LNG export hub, so its production is large relative to the Starship numbers above.
Bottom line: 30 launches/week would require on the order of 2–3% of Louisiana’s current statewide natural gas production. It is noticeable in a local/regional sense (especially if concentrated near a launch site and liquefaction plant) but easily within the scale of existing production and the growth already expected from Haynesville and Gulf Coast demand (LNG, etc.). Pipeline, liquefaction, and cryogenic logistics would be the practical constraints long before raw supply. SpaceX is already pursuing dedicated gas infrastructure (e.g., the “Starpipe” concept near Starbase) precisely for this reason.
quote:

It's funny seeing some of my colleagues who could barely type a complete sentence not long ago all of a sudden sending polite, structured and thoughtful emails now.



Shouldn't your AI Bot be reading these emails for you?

re: Woot?

Posted by Kingpenm3 on 8/21/26 at 10:58 am to
I miss the midnight surprises and the bags of crap.
quote:

What are my options if I can no longer afford my house?



Get a roommate. Rent costs are astronomical right now, people will pay a bunch for a place to stay.

Crazy to think she was so young and Heroes was almost 20 years ago.


Adaptive cruise control is awesome

re: Jimbo Fisher cow sale

Posted by Kingpenm3 on 8/15/26 at 10:29 am to
Just sold the first calf for $300k
I'm coming from my pixel 8 pro xl. Best and longest lasting phone I've ever had. I went ahead and got my pre-order in for the 11 pro xl 16/512. Can't wait. I'll report back.

It's funny to watch how slow progress is sometimes. My boyfriend made an appointment to see an orthopedic surgeon the other day. Phone call was 100% AI. It took forever to go through every single prompt to finally get everything done. Must have taken 15 minutes of talking to the robot.

We know that eventually this will be a 20 second prompt that gets our personal AI to communicate with theirs. But how many years will this take to become a reality.

quote:

Yes. You can even play NCAA on a console vs someone on a PC. Cross platform option has gotten to be pretty common with online play games.



And you can hook up xbox controllers to a pc too.
quote:

What exactly is “piped in music?”



It all comes through the white pipe above the West gates.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.

Things to do/eat in Denver

Posted by Kingpenm3 on 8/6/26 at 8:24 pm
I'm flying to Denver tomorrow, get there around 10:00, but don't have to be to my meeting until 5:00. Any suggestions for things to do or a really neat place to go eat for lunch? TIA!

House offer question

Posted by Kingpenm3 on 8/5/26 at 10:45 pm
We found a house in Lake Charles that we really like. House is only 3 years old. But while touring the house I noticed that about half of the windows in the house were not correctly latched closed. The little flip latches wouldn't line up with the window correctly to lock. All of them were flipped "closed" without going into the latch, which made them worse because that just pushed the windows out further from their correct location so they weren't sealed. They were single-hung, tilt-in windows.

Maybe the heat and humidity has them swelled up. Maybe the previous owners just didn't know what they were doing so they've been like that for a while. Or maybe they weren't installed well and have always been like that.

But I don't want to have to get to the inspection phase (and pay for the inspection) before this is addressed. How do I approach this in the offer? Could I make an offer contingent on correcting the windows? Or should I wait and address that after the inspection? TIA
Corey was great. We went in there one time and he asked us what we wanted. We said we weren't sure, so he asked "Have you had our burger before?" We said no, and he said "Ahhhh. Well that is why you don't know what you want then".