
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:28 am to SCLibertarian
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:30 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I honestly can't imagine what those three male jurors have had to go through during this trial/deliberations.
Probably the same thing that most of us married men go through from time to time.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:04 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
That’s the set up most places.
No it's not. Most states require the defense to prove by the preponderance of the evidence (or even higher with clear and convincing evidence) that there person is insane.
In Massachusetts, the defense merely has to present some credible evidence of insanity, then the state has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she's not insane.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:04 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:06 pm to GeneralLee
If she gets off hopefully karma will get her.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:25 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Most states require the defense to prove by the preponderance of the evidence (or even higher with clear and convincing evidence) that there person is insane.
Louisiana doesn’t.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:26 pm to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Louisiana doesn’t.
That's not what your code appears to state and numerous other references online.
quote:
Art. 652. Burden of proof
The defendant has the burden of establishing the defense of insanity at the time of the offense by a preponderance of the evidence.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:33 pm to Proximo
quote:
Women are fricking retarded
How terrible was that jury pool that you ended up with 8 chicks (2 of which are more than likely feminist activists)?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:37 pm to Proximo
So it's a hung jury?
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:51 pm to Hoops
quote:
Yeah when this bitch gets off the racial shite gonna go crazy
Not really. A black mom was recently declared insane in another case of a mom killing her kids. A key takeaway from that case was that the mom did not take any of the medication prescribed to her and instead smoked weed everyday.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:52 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I honestly can't imagine what those three male jurors have had to go through during this trial/deliberations.
I’d end up being a defendant myself
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:54 pm to supadave3
quote:
I’d end up being a defendant myself
I’d dox the shite out of any woman that voted Not Guilty and deal with the consequences.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 1:57 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
So it's a hung jury?
No, there are plenty more days for deliberations.
However...taking this long isn't great. You likely have a few on one side or the other that isn't budging.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:06 pm to Lawyered
quote:
They won’t want to live with themselves condemning this strong and fierce mama bear to jail for eternity
I wonder if this is true. I know there have been a lot of women supporters on the news, but these seem like fringe to me.
As a woman, I can NOT imagine murdering my children. The thought makes me physically sick to my stomach. And I really struggled with hormones after birth. Especially my last because I was older and in the throes of perimenopause as well. Some women are harder on other women than men are.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:08 pm to Fun Bunch
So if we acknowledge that hormones can cause women to go completely out of their minds to the point of murdering all three of their kids sequentially, why should we trust them to be president, vote, be in the military, be police officers, etc? If my kids went to daycare do I need to be concerned if their teacher has recently had a kid? Where is the line?
I don't think the femboss clancy-lovers realize how this trial result could look in terms of autonomy for women. As a married man with two daughters its actually pretty insulting to women in a way.
I don't think the femboss clancy-lovers realize how this trial result could look in terms of autonomy for women. As a married man with two daughters its actually pretty insulting to women in a way.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:09 pm to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
Some women are harder on other women than men are.
That’s normally applies when women are competing for attention from men.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:10 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
You likely have a few on one side or the other that isn't budging.
I’m going to go ahead and take a guess it’s the crazy arse women that are the ones not budging.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:39 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
I don't think the femboss clancy-lovers realize how this trial result could look in terms of autonomy for women.
they arent capable of that level of critical thought.

Popular
Back to top



2











