Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Started By
Message

Boston DA lists crimes she won’t prosecute

Posted on 12/11/18 at 6:58 am
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18905 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 6:58 am
Newly elected liberal DA in Boston is on the “cutting edge of Justice Reform” and has published a list of cases her office will auto decline. Can’t wait to see what this does to the crime rate. Especially the Possession With Intent to Distribute cases. She has basically legalized drug dealing.

quote:

Boston, MA – When Suffolk County’s district attorney-elect Rachel Rollins takes over the prosecutor’s office in January, criminals will no longer need to worry about being held accountable for many offenses – including resisting arrest.

Charges for which the Default is to Decline Prosecuting (unless supervisor permission is obtained).
Trespassing
Shoplifting (including offenses that are essentially shoplifting but charged as larceny) Larceny under $250
Disorderly conduct
Disturbing the peace
Receiving stolen property
Minor driving offenses, including operating with a suspend or revoked license
Breaking and entering — where it is into a vacant property or where it is for the purpose of sleeping or seeking refuge from the cold and there is no actual damage to property Wanton or malicious destruction of property
Threats – excluding domestic violence
Minor in possession of alcohol
Drug possession
Drug possession with intent to distribute
A stand alone resisting arrest charge, i.e. cases where a person is charged with resisting arrest and that is the only charge
A resisting arrest charge combined with only charges that all fall under the list of charges to decline to prosecute, e.g. resisting arrest charge combined only with a trespassing charge

Instead of prosecuting, these cases should be (1) outright dismissed prior to arraignment or (2) where appropriate, diverted and treated as a civil infraction for which community service is satisfactory, restitution is satisfactory or engagement with appropriate community-based no-cost programming, job training or schooling is satisfactory.



L LINK
Posted by zzemme
Member since Nov 2008
10163 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:00 am to
I’m very curious to see how this turns out
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15325 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:00 am to
They are fricked.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52996 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:00 am to
Prosecuting crimes is neocolonialism
Posted by rowbear1922
Lake Chuck, LA
Member since Oct 2008
15166 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:01 am to
Soooo I can get $240 worth of food, alcohol, clothes, etc every day and never get charged?




I'm in!
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:02 am to
Well if her office isnt going to prosecute them then how about giving the power to the people
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 7:03 am
Posted by tigerstripedjacket
This side of the wall
Member since Sep 2011
3001 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:02 am to
So brave.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Minor in possession of alcohol Drug possession Drug possession with intent to distribute A stand alone resisting arrest charge, i.e. cases where a person is charged with resisting arrest and that is the only charge


I agree with these.


The rest are a big ball of WTF


And is it really her place to decide? If we don’t want these to be crimes why can’t we just vote to decriminalize them.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52996 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:04 am to
No aren’t you white?
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
15511 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Soooo I can get $240 worth of food, alcohol, clothes, etc every day and never get charged? I'm in!


Read the whole thing, you can still get civil infractions like fines, restitution, and community service. You just won't get jail time.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29166 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:04 am to
Worth a shot. You may be surprised about that crime rate. Instead of sending people to prison to learn more about becoming a criminal as well as making it very difficult for them to get a job, make them donsome community service and try to actually rehab them into society. The end goal shouldn’t be punishment but a more peaceful and prosperous community as a whole. Why not try something different.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:04 am to
quote:

Soooo I can get $240 worth of food, alcohol, clothes, etc every day and never get charged?
I have a feeling that list really only applies to black people.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53805 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:05 am to
So she basically gets to determine what is a crime now. Seems American
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119158 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:06 am to
Some of those are actually serious. I'm glad to see the lawlessness is continuing in America's most liberal cities.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18905 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:07 am to
quote:

And is it really her place to decide? If we don’t want these to be crimes why can’t we just vote to decriminalize them.


THIS is the crux of the argument. There is Prosecutorial Discretion for weak cases or exceptional circumstances but how does an elected official take the Oath of Office with the intent to not fulfill their duties? You can’t just blanket decide not to follow the law. That ain’t how it works.
Posted by rowbear1922
Lake Chuck, LA
Member since Oct 2008
15166 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:07 am to
quote:

No aren’t you white?


Frick, I forgot....my B
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 7:08 am
Posted by BiggerBear
Redbone Country
Member since Sep 2011
2923 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:09 am to
All prosecutors have discretion to allow pre-trial diversion and to not prosecute certain crimes under certain circumstances. There's nothing really wrong with that if done reasonably. But announcing, up front, that it's basically The Purge for misdemeanors is pretty stupid.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20505 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:10 am to
So, I can hang out in her back yard, snort some blow, steal $249 from her purse, threaten to kill her family, fight with the police when they get there, and they just let me go? Awesome!
This post was edited on 12/11/18 at 7:16 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51614 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Read the whole thing, you can still get civil infractions like fines, restitution, and community service. You just won't get jail time.


If they aren't going to prosecute then all I need to do is plead "not guilty", right?
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 12/11/18 at 7:11 am to
A bunch of gateway crimes.

I wonder if she ran on this agenda
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram