Started By
Message

AI controlled vehicle kill switches appear to be coming to new vehicles later this year

Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2976 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:13 pm
Every so often a law that was passed years ago quietly becomes a present-day compliance reality. Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is one of those laws. Tucked into an eleven-hundred-page infrastructure bill with little public debate, the “kill switch law” as it has come to be known by some, awaits implementing regulations. The law has triggered debates in Congress seeking to defund the law, as well as lots of hand wringing around privacy and data governance questions that businesses, fleet operators, and their legal counsel are trying to answer before the technology becomes standard equipment in new vehicles.

What the Law Actually Requires

Section 24220 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require that all new passenger vehicles be equipped with what the statute calls “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.” In practical terms, the law contemplates two types of systems:

A passive performance-monitoring system that continuously observes a driver’s behavior and restricts or prevents vehicle operation if the system determines the driver may be impaired;
or
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.

LINK
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
74878 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:15 pm to
Wish DavidtheGnome had been equipped with one.

LucasP wouldn’t have had to die.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21774 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.


Drunk driving is an acceptable way of life in SC... having been hit by a drunk arse driver, I find it hard not to root for this.

Downvote away...

ETA context... in SC, we're #1 for DD deaths. "South Carolina: Ranked #1 in drunk driving fatalities with 7.1 deaths per capita and high rates of drunk drivers in fatal crashes."
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 8:25 pm
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
4075 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:25 pm to
The cars are drunk in SC? Wild.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21774 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

The cars are drunk in SC? Wild.


The cars, the people, the bikes, the squirrels.... it's all drunk except the skunk in SC.
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
15662 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Tucked into an eleven-hundred-page infrastructure bill with little public debate

It was only a $1 Trillion+ bill.

Why read it or debate it when there’s enough pork and grift to pay off everybody.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105309 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:28 pm to
There goes my hobby of watching live police chases on youtube.
Posted by Cycledude
Member since Jul 2018
2276 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:32 pm to
First it was seatbelts, then airbags, then anti lock brakes. I guess this is just the next step of saving us from ourselves. Self driving cars may make this obsolete though.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75174 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:33 pm to
We need an AI search function for TD.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75174 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:34 pm to
This plan started with all the idiots buying into the "Cash for Clunkers" scam.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21774 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

I guess this is just the next step of saving us from ourselves.


This is saving us from drunk arse Memorial Day Revelers driving a hummer towing a boat from crashing into you at a decent rate of speed at a red light (that's what happened to me).

Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18076 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:36 pm to
Drive thru daquiri places about to be fricked.
Posted by willeaux
Member since Jan 2006
2994 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:39 pm to
Damn fuel injection ruined everything.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26320 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.

Why would anyone be against this?
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2976 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:46 pm to
Maybe we could submit a blood sample every time that we want to start a car?
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1777 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Ranked #1 in drunk driving fatalities with 7.1 deaths per capita


That seems…very high. 39,000,000 people were killed by drunk drivers in South Carolina?! Or is everyone a cat and they have 9 lives?
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
11193 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Why would anyone be against this?


Missouri v McNelly

quote:

Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri, regarding exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under exigent circumstances. The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a per se exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21774 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

That seems…very high. 39,000,000 people were killed by drunk drivers in South Carolina?! Or is everyone a cat and they have 9 lives?


I believe per capita is like per 100,000… or 1,000… dunno, I’m drinking right now.
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
2317 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.


Why would anyone be against this?


Because frick you, that's why.
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
2957 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:54 pm to
Honestly, at this point I don't see myself ever buying anything beyond like 2016 or so...will have to do a little research to determine the exact cutoff for any vehicle in considering.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram