- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AI controlled vehicle kill switches appear to be coming to new vehicles later this year
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:13 pm
Every so often a law that was passed years ago quietly becomes a present-day compliance reality. Section 24220 of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is one of those laws. Tucked into an eleven-hundred-page infrastructure bill with little public debate, the “kill switch law” as it has come to be known by some, awaits implementing regulations. The law has triggered debates in Congress seeking to defund the law, as well as lots of hand wringing around privacy and data governance questions that businesses, fleet operators, and their legal counsel are trying to answer before the technology becomes standard equipment in new vehicles.
What the Law Actually Requires
Section 24220 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require that all new passenger vehicles be equipped with what the statute calls “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.” In practical terms, the law contemplates two types of systems:
A passive performance-monitoring system that continuously observes a driver’s behavior and restricts or prevents vehicle operation if the system determines the driver may be impaired;
or
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
LINK
What the Law Actually Requires
Section 24220 directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require that all new passenger vehicles be equipped with what the statute calls “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.” In practical terms, the law contemplates two types of systems:
A passive performance-monitoring system that continuously observes a driver’s behavior and restricts or prevents vehicle operation if the system determines the driver may be impaired;
or
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
LINK
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:15 pm to weagle1999
Wish DavidtheGnome had been equipped with one.
LucasP wouldn’t have had to die.
LucasP wouldn’t have had to die.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:22 pm to weagle1999
quote:
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
Drunk driving is an acceptable way of life in SC... having been hit by a drunk arse driver, I find it hard not to root for this.
Downvote away...
ETA context... in SC, we're #1 for DD deaths. "South Carolina: Ranked #1 in drunk driving fatalities with 7.1 deaths per capita and high rates of drunk drivers in fatal crashes."
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:25 pm to SallysHuman
The cars are drunk in SC? Wild.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:27 pm to holmesbr
quote:
The cars are drunk in SC? Wild.
The cars, the people, the bikes, the squirrels.... it's all drunk except the skunk in SC.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:28 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Tucked into an eleven-hundred-page infrastructure bill with little public debate
It was only a $1 Trillion+ bill.
Why read it or debate it when there’s enough pork and grift to pay off everybody.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:28 pm to weagle1999
There goes my hobby of watching live police chases on youtube.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:32 pm to Jim Rockford
First it was seatbelts, then airbags, then anti lock brakes. I guess this is just the next step of saving us from ourselves. Self driving cars may make this obsolete though.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:33 pm to weagle1999
We need an AI search function for TD.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:34 pm to Jim Rockford
This plan started with all the idiots buying into the "Cash for Clunkers" scam.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:35 pm to Cycledude
quote:
I guess this is just the next step of saving us from ourselves.
This is saving us from drunk arse Memorial Day Revelers driving a hummer towing a boat from crashing into you at a decent rate of speed at a red light (that's what happened to me).
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:36 pm to weagle1999
Drive thru daquiri places about to be fricked.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:39 pm to weagle1999
Damn fuel injection ruined everything.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:41 pm to weagle1999
quote:
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
Why would anyone be against this?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:46 pm to jrodLSUke
Maybe we could submit a blood sample every time that we want to start a car?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:46 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Ranked #1 in drunk driving fatalities with 7.1 deaths per capita
That seems…very high. 39,000,000 people were killed by drunk drivers in South Carolina?! Or is everyone a cat and they have 9 lives?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:48 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
Why would anyone be against this?
Missouri v McNelly
quote:
Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Missouri, regarding exceptions to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution under exigent circumstances. The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a per se exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:50 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
That seems…very high. 39,000,000 people were killed by drunk drivers in South Carolina?! Or is everyone a cat and they have 9 lives?
I believe per capita is like per 100,000… or 1,000… dunno, I’m drinking right now.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:51 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
A blood-alcohol detection system that prevents or limits operation when BAC meets or exceeds the legal limit of 0.08%.
Why would anyone be against this?
Because frick you, that's why.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 8:54 pm to weagle1999
Honestly, at this point I don't see myself ever buying anything beyond like 2016 or so...will have to do a little research to determine the exact cutoff for any vehicle in considering.
Popular
Back to top

20









