- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yearly NBA trade thread, BREAKING: Mark Williams trade rescinded by Lakers
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:41 pm to TigerinATL
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:41 pm to TigerinATL
Is that dude a legit insider? Everything the Warriors and Curry have said is that they don't wasn't to make a desperate or drastic move, much less them being at Defcon 1 and all options on the table.
1
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:52 pm to iwyLSUiwy
If the market for Ingram is as bad as it's made out to be, the Warriors can probably get him cheap.
BI + Javonte Green for Wiggins, Looney, Podz
That seems in the ball park of both fair and cheap from a Warriors assets point of view if you consider BI an upgrade over Wiggins.
BI + Javonte Green for Wiggins, Looney, Podz
That seems in the ball park of both fair and cheap from a Warriors assets point of view if you consider BI an upgrade over Wiggins.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:42 pm to Chalkywhite84
quote:
Wtf
Serious question (I don't want to argue):
Is the "wtf" because you think its bad value or "wtf" because you don't think Toronto would do it?
If its because you don't like the value then do you think that would be worse than 2-3 late 1sts?
Toronto will certainly finish bottom 12 and their pick could be closer to #6 than #12.
Even if you put Herb/ BI's value at (4) 1sts none of them would end up being a high end lottery pick in a loaded draft. (While you have another top 5 pick).
If its because you don't think Toronto does it then understandable.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 6:29 pm to TigerinATL
quote:Extension? Hell no unless it is at a bargain basement price. As far as the 50/50 odds,. way for Spears to go way out on a limb there.
Marc Spears puts 50/50 odds on a BI trade and drops that CJ wants a new extension CJ wrote a series of articles for Spears his first year as a Pel, so he probably heard that direct from CJ.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 6:33 pm to TigerinATL
Not sure if it’s been discussed. But look what the Bulls got for Lavine. Absolutely nothing. And when you look at his numbers this season, they aren’t that bad, he’s generally a healthier guy than Ingram, and he’s more of a modern NBA player.
I think Ingram’s value is pretty much Sato, Temple and a 2nd at this point, especially with the contract issue.
I’m not saying his value should be that low, but if we are being realistic about it, it unfortunately is that low.
I think Ingram’s value is pretty much Sato, Temple and a 2nd at this point, especially with the contract issue.
I’m not saying his value should be that low, but if we are being realistic about it, it unfortunately is that low.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:02 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
If the market for Ingram is as bad as it's made out to be, the Warriors can probably get him cheap.
BI + Javonte Green for Wiggins, Looney, Podz
That seems in the ball park of both fair and cheap from a Warriors assets point of view if you consider BI an upgrade over Wiggins.
BI is not an upgrade to Wiggins imo. Wiggins is a better defender and not going to stop the ball like BI. Plus Podz has potential and Looney is solid.
That's a very one-sided trade for the Pels.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:13 pm to ghost2most
Wiggins is older than BI and has had some personal issues. Podz has not shown much yet (seems to have regressed). Looney is a pretty deep bench player.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 2/3/25 at 8:29 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
If the market for Ingram is as bad as it's made out to be, the Warriors can probably get him cheap. BI + Javonte Green for Wiggins, Looney, Podz That seems in the ball park of both fair and cheap from a Warriors assets point of view if you consider BI an upgrade over Wiggins.
And what picks to the Pels? Why would you take Wiggins’ contract for nothing?
Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:20 pm to SEC Doctor
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Don’t see the purpose behind this, but ok
Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:36 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
I’m not saying his value should be that low, but if we are being realistic about it, it unfortunately is that low.
Then you just let him walk. He played hardball on an extension and tanked his trade value. Let him hit the market and a new reality.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:18 am to NOSHAU
Podz is starting to play better again after a shite start. I’d take him
Posted on 2/4/25 at 4:42 am to Townedrunkard
If BI walks for nothing , does it free up cap or is this like Asik?
Posted on 2/4/25 at 5:02 am to Stamps74
It frees up space under the tax.
There is always a sign and trade possibility also, remember Brooklyn is the only team projected with cap space next season.
There is always a sign and trade possibility also, remember Brooklyn is the only team projected with cap space next season.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 10:44 am to Soggymoss
Posted on 2/4/25 at 10:46 am to Fun Bunch
There is so much smoke about GS's interest in BI it has to be somewhat legit
Which should make us question his value, because they're a much better organization than we are
Which should make us question his value, because they're a much better organization than we are
Posted on 2/4/25 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is so much smoke about GS's interest in BI it has to be somewhat legit
Here is the issue: its been reported that GSW has shown interest in like 10 players. They are trying to get a deal done and are looking at everyone. I doubt BI is at the top of the list, and in fact, he isn't because it appears they have tried to get several other deals done and failed.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
They have asked for LeBron, KD and Butler. While I can’t say anything is off the table anymore, I think all of those are extremely unlikely. Were in on LaVine but that is done. I think BI makes the most sense for them, but anything can happen here.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 10:59 am to ghost2most
quote:
Plus Podz has potential and Looney is solid.
This board will say BI, Zion, and CJ are trash, Jose and Hawk are unplayable but then turn around and say Kevon Looney is solid
Posted on 2/4/25 at 11:04 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
This board will say BI, Zion, and CJ are trash, Jose and Hawk are unplayable but then turn around and say Kevon Looney is solid
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/4/25 at 11:08 am to PELsu
Angel Looney
Page 29 of 46
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News