Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:N/A
Biography:N/A
Interests:Classified
Occupation:Winner
Number of Posts:5895
Registered on:6/29/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Says the guy who thinks Dejounte fricking Murray is the best player on our roster

Who is the best player on our roster then? You do know he's our only 2 way player? He is the only player on our team who is top 3 on both offense and defense. You don't think the guy who at his best averaged 21pts/ 8reb/ 9ast/ 2stl in a season can be our best player?

quote:

We need to start clearing the books though for a rebuild, not trading around like for like salaries in hopes of a quick fix

Clearing the books doesn't help you. You really don't understand what you are saying. We have $156mil in cap space. We can spend up to $189mil because of the contracts already on the roster. If you get rid of Pooles $30mil instead of having $189mil next year you now have $156mil accounted for and only $3mil to spend.

What helps more? $3mil on a FA or a player up to $30mil from somewhere else?

Having that extra space only helps if we have to pay Trey, Herb, Queen, Fears, etch. Guess what we don't have to do for the next 3+ years? The answer is pay Trey, Herb, Queen, Fears etccc. Whatever imaginary space you are talking about doesn't really exist and doesn't actually help us unless that person is already on the roster.

Letting Poole, CJ, Z walk doesn't help us it hurts us. The only way those things help us is if we take back players that we can re-sign.

For this example Bey is that player. The extra $ in a trade helped us potentially get another long term piece that we wouldn't have gotten in FA or with "space".
The amount of idiots that don't understand having Poole gives us $30mil to use and NOT having Poole/ CJ gives us NOTHING to use is astonishing. Y'all really don't even know wtf you are saying.

Pelicans having Poole for $30mil and being able to take back $30mil is a good thing.

Pelicans having Z for $40mil and being able to take back $40mil is a good thing.

Whatever bullshite "could have" "should have" response to this doesn't matter. Having them now is better than not having them now. We do not gain anything not having those guys.
quote:

I'd rather not be locked in for Poole for two more years after this. 

Well thankfully we aren't either.

quote:

CJ is off Washington's books after this year. It was a bad trade.

Why do people constantly think that LOSING the salary from CJ/ Zion without replacing it helps us? Its the dumbest opinion on here this season.

quote:

Then we are destined to never win anything

How can you have this opinion while also being dense enough to think that letting CJ/ Z walk and losing that salary helps us? We are destined to never win anything but you expect us to use the space from CJ to do what? Sign imaginary elite level players with pur $5mil cap space? Shits hilarious.

re: Your 2025 offensive ROY

Posted by Dantheman504 on 12/28/25 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

it's because he has what 60 PRs because Titans are awful?

He doesn't return his own teams punts. He does have the most KRs because the Titans are awful.
Why throw Dumars in there? He had nothing to do with Murray/ Z and if you'd actually rather CJ > Poole/ Bey then idk what to tell you.

DJ could still be the best player on our roster.
quote:

Not an expert on it, but everything I’ve seen says SOS is the first tiebreaker for draft slot

I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure SOS is the first tiebreaker if there isn't a H2H.

Technically H2H wouldn't be the 1st "tiebreaker" because it eliminates the tie

quote:

Give me playoffs instead.

With this roster? I'd much rather a top draft pick and add assets > a playoff exit.

I would love to be in the playoffs but I'm not unrealistic enough to think we are winning a SB this year. A top draft pick helps us more.

quote:

That "Top End Draft Pick" better PRODUCE

Agreed
quote:

Wasting the first 8 weeks with Rattler cost us


You call it a waste, I call it a guaranteed top end draft pick.
quote:

You need 1) atlanta to beat the Rams on MNF, 2) Raiders to beat the Chiefs, 3) Browns to beat the Bengals, and 4) Miami to beat the Patriots.

You have a few of these backwards. Can someone explain why MIA has anything to do with our draft pick?

A very likely scenario is ATL losses out, Cin/ KC win, and we finish #9 with ATL (LAR) at #8.
I'd add 23 y/o Sanker to that group.
I believe we can still finish #8 with a win vs ATL.

We need ATL to win today and Cin/ KC to win next week.

quote:

Miami over NE next week
MIA has a h2h against us. Its #8-#11
quote:

Estime needs a TD.
Dude has been working.
Hope to see him back next game

I don't get the exaggerated RB takes. Estime and Neal look fine even with this shitty OL. Give them a push and RB is not anywhere close to a "need" compared to other roster spots.

re: Rookie of the year

Posted by Dantheman504 on 12/28/25 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Because this is a voted on award and narratives play a massive part

The narrative should be how good he's playing in spite of the rest of our garbage arse team.
quote:

Absolute Needs:

LG, RG, #1WR, #4 WR, NT, #1CB

quote:

Absolute Needs

Cut Radunz.
Cut Taysom
Cut the 2 fumble recovery players
Resign Alontae and then cut him

re: Rookie of the year

Posted by Dantheman504 on 12/28/25 at 2:27 pm to
No Shough does not need to win. Why would our shitty defense have any impact on an individual award?

Shough throws for 300 yards and 3 TDs but our defense doesn't get a single stop? Yeah that for sure should negatively impact Shough's individual play.
We really have a curse for DB's. Every time we sign or trade for a vet they end up absolute shite.

Every single competent DB has been drafted or signed undrafted.

Lattimore, Bell, Williams, CGJ, Adebo, etc.

Even Godchaux, Shepherd, DD, and Cam are playable but almost every single vet DB that comes here is washed garbage no matter the age.

If we singed a 35 y/o DL or LB from another team I'd have more confidence they are playable by the end of the season > a 26 y/o DB from another team.
quote:

I could have sworn that 2nd down run was a first down. They just marked it 3rd and didn’t even give it a second look?


My biggest pet peeve from Kellen Moore. This is the 3rd/ 4th time we got a 1st and they marked it short without any argument or bitching from our coach. He even went in to hurry up a few times.

That's a big deal IMO. I really hope a reporter calls him out on it. It is extremely necessary.

quote:

Good for him....here are some season stats:

Here is a comparable minutes breakdown. Thought I would help since you accidentally left out assists and the fact that Flagg is playing almost 35minutes a game. All 3 of Flagg/ Queen/ Kon are really good.

Flagg:
19.4 ppg
49.3% FG
6.4 rebounds
3.8 assists
80% FT

Queen:
18 PPG
51.6% FG
9 rebounds
5.4 assists
80% FT
quote:

Our future is in our 2 rookies, making decisions to try and "win" next season is what screwed us with AD and again with Zion, why would you want to do that again?

Making decisions to win because of Z/ AD is way different than making decisions to win in spite of AD/ Z. This is not the same scenario.

I want the Pels to trade Z but he's worth more than 1-2 late 1sts and since we have leverage (he's on contract and we don't need him) then we can look for the right package instead of getting rid of him for expirings.

quote:

Free up the space.

We don't free up space by trading Zion, stop saying this stupid shite. I'd rather a 40% chance of having someone come off the bench to put up 25pts in 25min than whatever tf $5mil in cap space will give us.

Getting rid of Z for expirings gives us barely any cap space. It would give us $30mil to extend players on our roster and we don't even have anyone that needs an extension for another 1-2 years. If you trade Poole/ Murray its only Bey for the next 3 years.

You have to trade Z for someone who needs that extension/ new contract or has similar salary/ impact in order for that to make any sense. That would instantly be more stupid or risky than any trade we've made the last few years.