- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Dantheman504
| Favorite team: | New Orleans Saints |
| Location: | N/A |
| Biography: | N/A |
| Interests: | Classified |
| Occupation: | Classified |
| Number of Posts: | 7147 |
| Registered on: | 6/29/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Isaias - Clean Up and Recovery Begins
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/9/26 at 1:13 pm to BigBro
quote:
Announcing a Cat 4 can cause a lot of panic
And cause a bunch of annoying people in this thread to DV every post that mentions Cat 4.
re: Langdon takes shot at certain player in NOLA that “wasn’t easy to deal with”
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/8/26 at 9:11 am to PUB
quote:
a bust. Accept reality that he is not a franchise cornerstone
I'm pretty sure just about everyone has accepted he's not a franchise cornerstone. Not being a franchise cornerstone also does not = bust.
Not many busts with a 24pt/ 6reb/ 4ast/ 1stl career average.
Previously overweight, immature, and unhealthy? Sure.
A dude who puts up those stats when healthy while not having any shot development + mediocre handles is a far way from a bust.
The top redraft players from his draft class are Herro/ Garland/ Ja/ RJ Barrett/ Colby W/ Z. You can make an argument Z is still #1.
re: Death/Funeral timeline
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/7/26 at 12:21 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Clearly you haven’t ever been to a big funeral put on by a black family if you aren’t grasping what I am talking about. No one is saying other people don’t have cars and flowers. The point was that the blacks do it at an entirely different level. Check some YouTube videos. It’s like a wedding or Quinceañera level of event.
Going to a funeral to understand how big the event is has nothing to do with not planning the big event until after the death. The point is that some don't plan the big event ahead of time which causes a longer wait period.
This quote is from a Black Funeral Traditions/ Customs article:
"After the immediate moment of mourning, planning begins. Black funerals are a true celebration of life. From the program, music and remarks to flowers, decor and food, a great deal goes into planning, and the details are as elaborate as budget allows."
Having a big event + not planning the big event ahead of time = longer wait period.
I'm sure less booking windows due to a larger population is a big driver here too but your point about a big event is somewhat irrelevant considering others have big events and just have them planned ahead of time.
re: Death/Funeral timeline
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/7/26 at 11:31 am to jbgleason
quote:
where they go all out and that takes time to set up. Event spaces, flowers, cars and limos, food, etc. So they usually wait a week or more to have the event.
That was a really long paragraph to state that some groups plan everything ahead of time and others don't. This comment makes no sense because it implies other groups don't do those same things. Yes, people who have funerals 2 days after death still have spaces, flowers, cars, food, etcc.
re: Plague watch 2026: Russian officials change the official story again
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/6/26 at 11:38 am to WeeWee
quote:
Good catch. I shouldn’t be reading stuff before my coffee has kicked in.
In your defense it was terribly worded.
re: Plague watch 2026: Russian officials change the official story again
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/6/26 at 10:00 am to WeeWee
quote:
If the situation is under control, why are they asking for help?
That's not what that says. It says the WHO is asking Russia for information about the plague death and Russia said its under control. And the word help isn't even in the paragraph. Fake news.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/6/26 at 9:47 am to shel311
quote:
9 years, he hasn't been a difference maker.
What does this mean? He was on the worst SAS squad in the last 30 years, dogshit Hawks team, then tore his achilles. Are you saying that Bam/ KD are also middle tier due to not making a difference? KD hopped on the GSW squad and Bam has never won a championship. Middle tier players?
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/1/26 at 4:00 pm to Broski
quote:
This is just not true.
He's a middle-tier starter that his previous teams couldn't figure out what to do with.
Surely you aren't letting your recency bias impact your overall view of Dejounte..
Can you give me your honest opinion of what "middle-tier starter" has been traded for (5) 1sts, a swap, and a lottery pick?
SAS traded Murray to maximize his value because he was an all star level player averaging 21pts/ 9reb/ 8ast and was seen as the exact opposite of whatever you just fabricated.
Just because the Hawks decided it was smart to pair 2 PGs who don't work together and then he tore his achilles doesn't just diminish him to a random mid NBA player.
SAS knew exactly what to do with Murray but were rebuilding so they traded him at high value.The Hawks traded every player on their roster including their #1 pick. Not a single player on their team is still there but yeah they didn't know what to do with just Murray, had nothing to do with the poverty franchise or dumb roster building.
Google would say you are wrong as well:
quote:
Dejounte Murray is generally not considered a "mid" player by NBA standards, but he is often viewed as a fringe All-Star or high-tier starting guard rather than a true elite superstar.
quote:
He is a former NBA All-Star, has led the league in steals, and has multiple seasons averaging over 20 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists per game. That production is well above average.
So is it recency bias or is it because he is an NBA player for the Pelicans? I'm sure if he was on any of the remaining 29 NBA teams he'd be viewed higher.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/1/26 at 1:16 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Since the roster essentially didn't change, anyone expecting improvement is really just expecting our two sophomore players to make a leap.
That's underselling it a bit. You should expect team improvement regardless of those 2 guys.
Murray is a high end starter who makes others better and Mathurin is a potential 6th man level player. That's not essentially nothing. You are talking about going from Hawk/ Jose to Murray/ Mathurin and calling it nothing.
You have Bey/ Fears who dropped 40pt games in a new system with unfamiliar teammates/ chemistry.
I'd hope the roster didn't change much if we added (4) of our Top 7 players and (5) of our Top 9 within the last year.
Would still be nice to get a starting center, that's really the only missing piece.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 10/1/26 at 9:58 am to Fun Bunch
Under 40 wins and little improvement from our new players would make me question the FO.
Success for me is based more on Fears/ Queen/ Mathurin/ Bey and less on Z/ Herb/ Trey.
It would be silly to measure failure based on Z/ Herb/ Trey as they were already part of a failed past time, have nothing to do with current FO moves, and have proven that none are true leaders/ closers/ clutch players up to now.
This is why I'm pretty stoked for the season. Happy to see Fears/ Murray/ Queen/ Bey/ Mathurin and view anything from Trey/ Z/ Herb/ Missi as a bonus.
If either of Trey/ Z actually live up to the hype along with getting a prime Murray back then we are in a very good position for the future.
Success for me is based more on Fears/ Queen/ Mathurin/ Bey and less on Z/ Herb/ Trey.
It would be silly to measure failure based on Z/ Herb/ Trey as they were already part of a failed past time, have nothing to do with current FO moves, and have proven that none are true leaders/ closers/ clutch players up to now.
This is why I'm pretty stoked for the season. Happy to see Fears/ Murray/ Queen/ Bey/ Mathurin and view anything from Trey/ Z/ Herb/ Missi as a bonus.
If either of Trey/ Z actually live up to the hype along with getting a prime Murray back then we are in a very good position for the future.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/30/26 at 3:52 pm to NOSHAU
quote:No, i don't think this and I didn't say this. Would you correlate "going backwards" to failure or success? If missing the playoffs is "failure" then that's going backwards from y'alls POV.
So you think if this team wins over 50 games, that the fans will think we are moving backwards?
quote:
Because expecting 20 wins and getting 44 would be a huge step back.
44 vs 50 is the difference between play in/ playoffs.
Several people in here said missing the playoffs is a FAILURE.
You are actually proving my point which was that winning 50 games and getting eliminated 0-4 is a minuscule difference vs winning 44 games and losing in the Play- In. But one is considered successful while the other is failure.
Which essentially means that we could win nearly double the amount of games, make huge improvements, and fans would still see it as... A failure (not my words, see the first page).
Idk how you are agreeing with me and arguing at the same time, while claiming I'm a mouthpiece when In reality i repeated what was said by others and you incorrectly chose to be my mouthpiece and misinterpreted what I said.
The consensus is that playoffs= success and losing the play in = failure even though that can be a 1 win/ loss differential. Doesn't make sense.
Clearly failure/ success is not black and white and there can be a gray area. Which was what I said in my first post while giving different examples of "success".
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/30/26 at 1:26 pm to shel311
quote:
I can expect 32 wins and still call 38 wins and missing the play in a failure of a season, those 2 things do not contradic t each other.
They do not contradict each other, its also not what I was referencing. If we win 44-48 games and get eliminated as the 7/8th seed due to injuries, a game winning shot, or bad play from Z for example then its hard to call that a failure of a season.
No one expects us to win a championship. You are now hedging success as getting eliminated 0-4 vs the absolute closest thing to it in my example.
There has to be realistic expectations, if you expect us to get outplayed by a Spurs/ OKC team in the 1st rd then is losing a close play in game that much less of an achievement?
We are also one of the Top 5 youngest teams in the NBA. Going from 26 wins to a competitive play-in game is very successful for our young players and development comparably.
quote:
But I'd call that a successful transaction, not a successful season on the court.
The specific question was "successful year". And then followed up by "what would make you question the FO".
Making a final assessment on Zion/ Murray, Fears/ Queen looking great, and going from 26 to 44+ wins would be a successful year comparably.
And doing those things should give people peace of mind regarding Dumars/ Weaver instead of questioning them.
The Pelicans might be the only fan base that could win double the games from the previous season, have all their young players look good, and still act like we are going backwards. Even Browns fans aren't that dramatic.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 4:59 pm to shel311
quote:
how missing the playoffs in any capacity is being labeled success is just wild to me.
Moving on from Z and anyone else holding us back IS success one way or another.
Missing the playoffs because Z/ Trey/ Murray/ Herb aren't moving the needle while Fears/ Queen look like future all stars would be successful if it means we finally build the team for the future and unload Z, Trey, Herb, etccc for future picks or young players.
I didn't say "missing the playoffs and everyone looking like shite is successful".
Z/ Trey/ Herb were on the roster before Dumars/ Weaver took control. Right now their guys are Fears/ Queen/ Bey/ Mathurin. If the guys our FO brought in look good while we see the same bullshite from older players then I'm not going to act like Dumars/ Weaver went backwards or messed something up.
If y'all really think the current team is so bad then all you should care about is Fears/ Queen/ '27 Bucks and whoever ends up looking good this year to keep with them.
I find it amusing that people in here will expect no more than 20 wins and then act like its only successful to them if we make the playoffs. Because expecting 20 wins and getting 44 would be a huge step back.
re: No Way This Guy is Running an NBA team
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 4:29 pm to shel311
quote:
last season...we won 26 of them.
The Saints were 1-15 in 1980, go wear a paper bag for the rest of your life.
Last season. last season. Last season. Its not last season, Its this season.
Did we frick up swapping out Hawk for Mathurin? Hiring Mosley/ Shammgod? Having our players the happiest they've ever been to be here? We are actually building a real culture and not some fabricated bullshite from the Griffin era.
Yeah i get it we attached a 2nd with Hawk. The way we did it was stupid. If we traded Hawk and 2 2nds for Mathurin during last season it would have been applauded.
How about being happy we hit on 2 lottery picks in the same year when we are essentially 1/7 the past 13 years?
Nerlens Noel #6
Buddy Hield #6
Zion #1
Jaxson Hayes #8
Kira Lewis #13
Dyson #8
Jordan Hawkins #14
We could have drafted a Hawk/ Hayes #7 and not even gotten trip dub Queen but yeah Dumars/ Weaver are doing just terrible.
re: What do you see as a "successful" year? On the flip, what would make you question the FO?
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 4:13 pm to Fun Bunch
There's different levels of "successful" IMO.
1. Playoffs + a clear long term vision.
2. A loss in the play in + Fears/ Queen/ Mathurin/ Missi looking like key future starters/ stars.
3. I'd argue its successful if we barely miss the playoffs but our young players look good and we finally trade Z and others for picks/ young players to pair with them.
We have the Bucks swap for 2027 and should get a Top 10 pick.
This season should be focused on who fits, what works, and planning for the future with Murray/ Poole/ Z and their $110mil combined salary up for extension/ trades.
1. Playoffs + a clear long term vision.
2. A loss in the play in + Fears/ Queen/ Mathurin/ Missi looking like key future starters/ stars.
3. I'd argue its successful if we barely miss the playoffs but our young players look good and we finally trade Z and others for picks/ young players to pair with them.
We have the Bucks swap for 2027 and should get a Top 10 pick.
This season should be focused on who fits, what works, and planning for the future with Murray/ Poole/ Z and their $110mil combined salary up for extension/ trades.
re: No Way This Guy is Running an NBA team
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 3:08 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Boy do I have some news for you
Are you going to give some hypothetical where we traded away 18 y/o Lebron for Queen? Or that we missed out on Wemby with the 2nd traded with Hawk? All bullshite and based on a hypothetical worst case scenario.
I think you are confusing preferences and opinions with the phrase "actually frick something up".
Queen being a bust, trading away future picks for a shitty player, giving Z $60mil a year right now, etch. Those are actually fricking something up.
Convincing yourself we missed out on hypothetical generational talents no matter what decisions were made is a personal mental issue and not something that can be discussed or argued.
Someone argued that if Queen becomes the best player in NBA and wins us championships that we still "lost the trade" due to positional value given up. Can't make this shite up if i tried.
re: No Way This Guy is Running an NBA team
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 1:53 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
But gotta feel for Pelicans fans having him and Weaver as their leaders."
Until they actually frick something up this is all just bullshite spewed by people who are still crying about the past.
Adding Bey, Mathurin, Queen, and Fears along with Mosley/ Shammgod are just so terrible as whole. People should feel just so terrible for us.
Cry me a fricking river.
If we see the same old Pels losing close games, Z not playing, bad shots and defense then alright. Until then these people need to just stfu and talk about the actual healthy talent on the roster.
re: We need executive action on MLB.
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 12:09 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
get rid of the wildcard round; it's absolutely crazy for teams to play 162 games and have a division winner have to play their second place team in a 3-game series to see who moves on
You think that's crazier than the 4th ranked team getting a bye? They should go 1-6 for seeding and get rid of the Division seeding. You shouldn't get a bye if you finish 4th after 162 games playing in a weaker division.
re: 1st unit vs 2nd unit
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/29/26 at 11:49 am to brmark70816
Here is my yearly "Herb is NOT a starter, should not start, and has no reason to start" comment.
Herb/ Murray defense to finish games is ideal. Absolutely unnecessary to start. Mathurin/ Bey make more sense. We start losing? Ok cool put in Herb.
I actually prefer:
Murray
Trey
Bey
Zion
Queen
Fears
Mathurin
Herb
Karlo
Missi
If you get a starting C then that's ideal and Queen takes Karlo's rotation spot at PF.
Herb/ Murray defense to finish games is ideal. Absolutely unnecessary to start. Mathurin/ Bey make more sense. We start losing? Ok cool put in Herb.
I actually prefer:
Murray
Trey
Bey
Zion
Queen
Fears
Mathurin
Herb
Karlo
Missi
If you get a starting C then that's ideal and Queen takes Karlo's rotation spot at PF.
re: Pelicans Media Day
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/28/26 at 12:21 pm to BallHawk
quote:
Most optimistic Dejounte has been about the org since he got here.
The dude spent 2 years on the Hawks hearing that they will trade him, then he gets traded and tears his Achilles. So he should have some optimism after 3 years of struggles.
re: Pelicans Media Day
Posted by Dantheman504 on 9/28/26 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I am going to choose to be positive between now and seeing actual games. I am going to hope that Joe was right and everyone else was wrong. This team DOES have talent.
All of this. But Jordan Poole on the roster gives me a weird feeling. You essentially replaced him with Mathurin. Hope there's still a plan as having $34mil in a 3rd string PG/ SG is tough.
Let me rephrase, I think there is a plan but i hope the plan is to trade him before the season starts and not make a decision at the deadline based on a need that we could fill now.
Popular
0












