Started By
Message

re: Griff: BI is "mechanically incapable" of being traded under the new CBA rules

Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:06 am to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28570 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:06 am to
quote:

They are going to have two new starters out of five at minimum.



They'll have one new starter for sure, a massive downgrade at the center position.

We'll see what happens on who's not starting between Murray/CJ/Herb, b/c one of them isn't going to start.

quote:

They've removed rotational players in Dyson Daniels, Naji, Jonas and Nance


They replaced JV with a huge downgrade in Theis
They replaced Nance with a 21st pick rookie
The replaced Dyson/Naji with Murray, which while an obvious upgrade, still leaves us thin defensively on the wing, but don't worry JRE and Matt Ryan will take their place. Dyson and Naji are going to play starter minutes in ATL and DAL. JRE shouldn't be on an nba roster, and Matt Ryan is a fringe NBA player.
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1445 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:09 am to
Are you truly of the opinion that Murray is not going to start?
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
10060 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:11 am to
quote:


Well, he’s not wrong…


He is wrong. Almost every team could trade for Ingram right now. No one wants to because no one wants to give him the 30% max he is demanding. Compared to the last CBA, maybe a couple of the big spending teams would've rolled the dice, but they still would be paying massive tax bills for a player that provides limited on court impact.

Teams would give him a 25% max, but 30% for Ingram's play is an anchor.
Ingram acts and plays like a #1, but if he's your #1 then you are capped at a 1st round exit.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:17 am to
quote:

It means he'd rather let BI walk than swallow his pride and look bad losing a trade of BI's caliber.


Exactly. If you’re not extending him, then accept sunk cost and trade him. Otherwise letting him play out his contract and walk is absolutely moronic. But its also on par with what Griffin does- I swear no other NBA owner would let him get away with this.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10750 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Teams would give him a 25% max, but 30% for Ingram's play is an anchor.


I don't believe this. I don't see anyone offering him over 30-35M. We might be the only team willing to hit the high side of that, just to secure an asset. We are obviously far apart with him..
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1445 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:39 am to
quote:

He is wrong. Almost every team could trade for Ingram right now.


We are hard capped at the first apron and less than a million dollars below it. That means that we essentially can not take back more money than we send out.

Many teams are either over the aprons, or hard capped and up to the aprons, meaning they too can not take back more than they can send out.

So you end up in a situation where the salaries have to basically match exactly, as well as the actual player talent. That eliminates a third to a half of the league.

The bigger issue we are seeing is that about a third of the league does not want to win basketball games this year. The 2025 draft has so many teams intentionally not trying to get better. Of course Charlotte, San Antonio, Detroit and on and on would love to have a Brandon Ingram. In most seasons they would be all for it. But this draft is too strong and these teams are locked into the long game. It is extremely rare for so many bad teams to actively not try and get better in the offseason.

I realize fan stands for fanatics, but I really wish our fan base could be a tad less dramatic. Take a step back, take a deep breath, and maybe go look at the stats and what Brandon has done for this team over the past five years. We will be more than ok keeping one of our best players at 26 years old.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
171810 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:45 am to
i fully expect ingram to have a beginning of the year soreness.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450394 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

the other 29 teams also do not want to give BI a 30% max, but he is blaming it on the new CBA becuase that's en vogue at the moment for execs.

That literally did just start

I mean the Clippers of all teams let PG go over a similar issue. They have infinite money.
Posted by Balsamic_duck
Member since Jun 2017
3876 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Exactly. If you’re not extending him, then accept sunk cost and trade him. Otherwise letting him play out his contract and walk is absolutely moronic. But its also on par with what Griffin does- I swear no other NBA owner would let him get away with this.


It's so stupid. He's a bad fit on this roster, we don't have a center, and there's too many mouths to feed.

This situation seems to be just as big of a shot to Griff's ego as it is BI's. Griff has widely been reported to be a huge BI fan and now the guy has little to no value. That must be a hard pill to swallow if you're Griff
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13045 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

I mean the Clippers of all teams let PG go over a similar issue. They have infinite money.
Not why they let PG go. They did not want to guarantee a 4th year because of his age. They were still going to pay him at least what Kawhi got but did not want to extend his deal longer.
Posted by unctiger4
Member since Mar 2015
2280 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:01 am to
When did the Pels move to the WNBA?
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
20337 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:16 am to
So basically it’s another year with BI running the clock out in games where we need a bucket to win and he clunks another fifth teen foot jumper. Run it back
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28570 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Are you truly of the opinion that Murray is not going to start?



I 100% believe he should be an unquestionable starter, just like BI and Zion should be.

There is no circumstance where Zion or BI come off the bench.

Willie loves CJ and vets, and CJ just came out about the disrespect Klay got from the Warriors moving him to the bench.
Herb just made 1st team all defense and shot 42% from 3. How can you not start that guy? He'd start for every single team in the NBA without a question except Boston.
Murray should without a doubt be the starting PG, but i just feel Willie will find it easier to ask Murray to come off the bench than CJ, evn though the obvious decision here should be that CJ comes off the bench.



We all sit here and discuss starters and act like it's not a big deal, but it's a big deal to NBA guys. Trey is not happy about not starting. One of CJ/Herb/Murray is going to be not happy about not starting. It's just the reality of NBA guys.
Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1445 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:28 am to
Well, sounds like we are mostly on the same page. I think the "starter" question is a WAY bigger deal than any basketball question. Anyone acting like having BI is bad for basketball or us winning has lost their grasp on reality.

But TWO of Murray, Herb, BI, CJ and Trey sitting the bench is a big freaking deal.

And while I have very strong opinions on it, I don't want to act like I know 100% for sure what the final result will be.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:29 am to
quote:

We all sit here and discuss starters and act like it's not a big deal, but it's a big deal to NBA guys. Trey is not happy about not starting. One of CJ/Herb/Murray is going to be not happy about not starting. It's just the reality of NBA guys.


Yup. If we’re a top 3 team then everyone swallows their pride and is ok with this. But if we’re being realistic, if we’re in the bottom of the west playoff race then those guys are going to be severely pissed with reduced minutes and bench role. This roster needs to be consolidated into a more effective roster that makes sense. This is ALL on Griffin. Willie got a lot of heat last season and deservedly so but if shite hits the can next season- Griffin should be feeling the hot seat.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Griff: BI is "mechanically incapable" of being traded under the new CBA rules

This is just Griff's spin on "nobody wants BI"


Nobody wants BI, and thus it is "mechanically impossible" to trade for him because it is illegal to send a guy to a team no one wants. Tada!
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35184 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

We are hard capped at the first apron and less than a million dollars below it. That means that we essentially can not take back more money than we send out.

People know enough about the CBA to get themselves all mixed up

We are not less than a million dollars below the first apron, we are pretty much right at the tax line, the first apron is ~8 million dollars above the tax line.
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
1084 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:10 pm to
Why is Griff saying this publicly and why is he the mouthpiece for the team?

Bryson Graham — GM
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35184 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

But TWO of Murray, Herb, BI, CJ and Trey sitting the bench is a big freaking deal.

They are potentially alleviating some of that by not trading for a center, they may start games with no real center on the court. I don't think that's very smart, or what I would do, but that may be the route they go.

DJ is going to start, I would say behind Zion he is the most locked in starter. How stupid would they look if one of their goals of the offseason was to get a primary ballhandler, then trade for that ballhandler and not start him. It's a no brainer that he starts.

Herb, IMO, is the next most important starter. Especially if we don't trade for a better center. We have to have solid perimeter defense.

As for the other 1 (or potentially 2) starting positions, I could see arguments for all three of the remaining players. I would think BI is probably the most likely to start out of those 3, but IMO it would be stupid to give a starting spot and minutes to a disgruntled player who is likely to be walking away after the season. If they are just going on talent, he clearly starts over CJ and Trey.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35184 posts
Posted on 7/16/24 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Bryson Graham — GM

Griff is his boss, Griff still calls the shots for the team. Same situation as when Trajan was here.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram