Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Atlanta, GA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:11389
Registered on:2/23/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Zion still a centerpiece?

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/22/26 at 6:08 am to
quote:

Don't get it twisted. Zion Williamson was the number 1 reason this team won less than 30 games in year 7 of his career.


I just don't agree. If I had to rank our failures.

1. Horrible leadership. We fired a coach that lost the locker room, tons of dysfunction from the top/down. Had to be cleaned and purged.

2. Poole was a ghost and was straight up horrible when we he did play. We had to have his shooting and consistent playmaker. He was a negative. Biggest disappointment on the team.

3. Murray missing basically the whole year. I though we'd get at least half a season from him, with him being really effective the last 20 or so games of the year. That didn't come close to happening.

4. Playing two rookies extended minutes and starting them for most of the year. Especially two project players. That's a lot growth, but it cost the team. Hopefully it pays off in the future.

5. Both Murphy and Jones missing extended time. If we had either one at certain stretches we pull in many more wins. Specifically Murphy out during the home stretch of the year. We would have easily hit 30 wins otherwise.

quote:

He is a power forward that doesn't rebound


Zion is not a PF. Zion is a powerful wing. We only play one big most of the time. Hes the strongest player in the league, but he's also one of the quickest and fastest.

Its odd that Zion gets hit with this type of backlash, but Murphy is alright? He's 6'10 with great athleticism and leaping ability. So why isn't he a better rebounder? Why cant he put on some muscle and bang some?

quote:

We've seen the best of Zion Williamson and it led absolutely nowhere bc he was unprofessional off the basketball court and he could not stay healthy or rehab properly enough to salvage seasons when we had BI, CJ, Jonas, Naji, Dyson, Trey, Herb and Jose to support him against a much weaker West (OKC, Spurs and Houston were not good yet).


I don't dwell in the past. I look towards the future. Zion is still the most talented player on the team. If we trade him, we're in full rebuild. I just dont see the team doing that. So we need to optimize what we have. If that upsets or disappoints you, then you're just not going to have much fun as a Pelicans fan this offseason..
quote:

didn't say he'll be a superstar or I'd even bet on it. But his peak is definitely higher than a high end role player.


I always liked the comp of Queen and Naz Reid. They are very similar body wise, play the 4/5, probably best as a high end back-up/6th man. Reid is a much better athlete and shooter. But those are things that Queen can dramatically improve. I'm cool with him coming off the bench the next two years as he steadily improves.. he's going to be in the league a long time..

re: Zion still a centerpiece?

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/21/26 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

think using win loss record from last year is very misleading, because we were the only terrible team in the league TRYING TO WIN after the All-Star break.


I agree. It was just a weird flex. We were obviously much better when he played.

Zion actually had a decent year though. He should have played more, but it was a good step forward. He's not the reason we sucked so bad. I'm not even sure he's in the top 5 of that list..

re: Zion still a centerpiece?

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/21/26 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

were 22-40 in games Zion played.


So we were 4-16 in the games he missed. Simple math shows we were almost twice as likely to win when he played. That seems significant

re: Mosley hired

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/19/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Jason Kidd fired.



40M left on his deal. That's crazy.

He might have agreed to a buyout though. I didn't realize he wanted the POBO role and was turned down..
quote:

I'll bite and put $20 on Pelicans to make the playoffs at 200 to 1 odds


It that a serious bet right now?
quote:

If we are going by strict lat and long on the map Memphis is 0.1 degrees more east than New Orleans while Minneapolis is 3.2 degrees further west than New Orleans so technically it should be Memphis and then New Orleans going east with Minnesota being the furthest west of the 3.


The goal should be grouping teams together. The two closest West teams to the Wolves are Memphis and OKC, which are both about 800 miles away. From Minny to both Milwaukee and Chicago is about half that. The Wolves should be with those teams around the Great Lakes. It's stronger rivalries. Like ours should be with the Texas teams. I think the only missing for us rival wise are the Hawks, which would usually be paired with a team from New Orleans. But it just doesn't seem as passionate as the groups up north. Not a lot of Pelican haters where I live. To be fair, there doesn't seem to be a ton of Hawks fans either..
We talked about this a couple of weeks ago. It should be the Wolves. They are closer to half a dozen East teams than the closest West team. It just makes geographic sense to move them to the East.
He'll be fine.

But we have to fix this roster. Need balance and depth..
quote:

I'm a fan of Rondo too but its no slam dunk, very little coaching experience and has a little bit of a checkered past. Maybe we find a way to get him in the building. Who knows.


I believe in progression. Why wasn't Rondo an assistant coach the past couple of seasons? His title was something like a special advisor or something like that. Everybody says that he has an incredible mind for basketball. But that's a small part of being a head coach, which is primarily people management, and very political. I just wouldn't be comfortable hiring someone with limited staff experience or no organizational knowledge. That's just too big of an adjustment.
The article says one game in Manchester and another in Paris. I think that is pretty cool. It's kind of dead in January and gets the team on a long trip. I'm pretty sure we'll know whether we have something going or preparing strip down and tank by that time.

I don't mind Mosely as a candidate. If he's the guy they are targeting, and he's hesitant, I get it. It has to be tough to have your team turn against you, and it was a horrible constructed team. They will be purging that roster in a year or two..

re: Coaching “search”

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/17/26 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

would go with Hetzel.


Why?

I just looked over his resume. He's been an assistant coach for over 10 years. He worked for 4 teams; Hornets, Magic, Blazers, and now the Nets. I don't think any of those teams did anything of significance while he was with them. I don't know what he would have done to vault him into a head position..
quote:

No way. I understand the team dynamics are different, on account of one being great and the other being horrendous, but no way would I make that trade. Fears is 19 years old and averaged 14/4/3 and Wallace is 22 and averaged 8/3/3 in 1 minute more per game. Fears is also 1 year into his rookie contract and Wallace, like you said, is going to get paid soon.


They are projecting Wallace to get a 4Y/100M deal. This is all how you predict each one going forward. I believe that Wallace can score an efficient 12+ppg, while being an elite level defender combo guard (ala Marcus Smart or Avery Bradley). He would slide into the backcourt along with Murray, since he can play 2-3 positions. So we aren't pressed to try and balance Fears and Murray, or trade Murray to make room for Fears. It just schematically fixes our line up and plugs major holes. Adding Joe is a major bonus. Losing Jones hurts, bit I like Bey taking his spot/minutes.

We need to add players from winning cultures/systems.
To me, the team to watch is the Thunder. They want to keep their window open as long as possible. Which means swapping out guys due big deals, and keep stocking with guys on low/rookie level type contracts. They are loaded with future picks and obscene depth. It's not crazy they might look to move a few of their primary pieces.

The one I am thinking about the most is Cason Wallace. He is due a big extension this summer. With Mitchell busting out, and they still have Topic and McCain. Do they look to move Wallace now? If they are letting Dort go, and we offer Jones/Fears for Wallace/Joe, do they go for that?

I would hate to give up Jones or Fears. But Wallace is 22 and a premier two-way PG with all-star potential (definitely all defense). The price is going to be steep, and we aren't going to out deal OKC.

re: 8th pick

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/10/26 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Nobody in that front office should have a job after last season.



Do you honestly think they are firing Dumars after less than a year on the job? Seriously, is that what you think could, should, or will happen?

That's just not in any way realistic. I'm not defending Dumars, but I mean come on. That's just not going to happen. He gets at least 2 more years to try to do whatever he's going to do.

quote:

and despite having a pretty healthy roster and drafting good rookies, we won 26 games.



We had horrible health this year. Only 3 guys hit 70 games, two were the rookies. Still too many guys missing too many games. The Poole thing was a disaster. I still do not understand what the hell happened there. Way too many guys missing time for no reason or mysterious circumstances. We should have easily hit 32 wins, probably closer to 35. We let too many easy wins go..

re: 8th pick

Posted by brmark70816 on 5/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

It didn’t really matter what happened today, IMO



Yeah, it mattered. If it hit top 5, there would be dozens of more threads about this, and tons of posters on here would be doing victory laps. They were all ready to hammer this super hard. So, it mattered a lot.

I'm happy we can should all be able to move past this. I doubt that will actually happen, and many will still harp on it. But it should shift some of the focus to our future construction, and what we do going forward.
quote:

Also your research sucks. You did not know Julius Randle was traded for KAT in the Dyson thread.



I'm the biggest Randle fan and defender on the board. Of course I knew about the trade. How could you think I didn't know they were traded for one another? That's just dumb. It was a huge trade.

I said "Huh", because you termed it like the Knicks got better by trading them for one another. Then you covered your arse by posting article that said both teams made out ok, so I didn't see a point in carrying on the conversation.

What does any of that have to do with this conversation? Why would you remember and bring it back up?
quote:

How about why are other teams not looking at Ham?



Teams follow trends and copy successful organizations. So right now everyone is targeting inexperienced candidates with high analytical philosophies. It's a boom/bust gamble. So a lot of older, more experienced assistants are being passed by (or they are comfortable being out of the head position). I know the Bucks interviewed Ham and he was a top 3 candidate for them. So there is one..
quote:

You seem to want everyone else to do the research for you and do not like the answers.


No. I've done plenty of research over the past weeks. I don't agree with the majority of the people here, about Brown, and i want to understand why the feel the way they do. So I'm engaging in a discussion. I'm not accepting "he's bad" or "he's friend with Dumars", as legit criticisms or reasons to bypass a candidate. I want to know why he's bad or why being friend with Dumars is a disqualifier (news flash, Dumars is the former executive VP of the league and has met with the vast majority of people associated with the league. So good luck finding someone he's not familiar and friendly)..
quote:

Critics pointed out that Ham rarely took responsibility for losses in post-game conferences, often blaming players or bringing up injuries, which ultimately led to him "losing the locker room"


The lockerroom was James and Davis. Once he lost those two, he was gone. In retrospect, Davis was traded less than a year later and the Lakers have tried everything to get rid of James as well. They just want to turn the page on that whole era.

I don't watch the Lakers that closely. So maybe all of that is valid. I just don't think it's a large enough sample size to demolish his career or prevent him from getting another head job. Especially when you take a step back and see it from a larger scale. It just doesn't look like that massive of a coaching failure. Literally people are saying he should have won the championship. I just never saw the Lakers as elite.
quote:

Willie Green would be better than Darvin Ham


No he's not.

This is the frustrating part about all of this. Nobody can explain how he's bad. He was in the playoffs both years with the Lakers. He's been a successful assistant. He's won two inseason tournaments. He's a legit good coach. His team had a meltdown and lost in the playoffs (to the eventual champion). People are blaming him for not winning a Championship with the Lakers. That's an insanely high bar. For some reason Reddick is getting a pass on that. I just don't get the vitriol. It doesn't make sense..