Started By
Message

When movies are marketed as “made by this guy!” I find that irritating

Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:25 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:25 pm
Latest example is The Covenant (which looks like a great movie btw).

It can’t just be marketed as “The Covenant”, no it’s “Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant”.

We get others like “James Cameron’s Avatar” etc…

We get it, these guys think they’re a big deal and they make good movies. I don’t know why it just seems like pandering to me and I find it annoying as hell.
This post was edited on 9/27/23 at 1:05 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87384 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:31 pm to
Supposedly it's to differentiate the films, like the 2006 "The Covenant"

I'm not sure that's the case for Lee Daniels and uh, others
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477231 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It can’t just be marketed as “The Covenant”, not it’s “Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant”.

Actually, legally, they had to use his name. This was the 2nd name change for the movie (after trying "the Interpreter" first)
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75424 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:36 pm to
Didn't this all start with "John Carpenter's Halloween?"
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
78748 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:37 pm to
Tyler Perry's Caddyshack 2: Electric Boogaloo
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79453 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 12:55 pm to
do you also not care about bands when albums come out?

or authors when books come out?

Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 1:05 pm to
I didn’t say I didn’t care about the director. I said it’s annoying when they include the directors name in the title of the movie
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
42291 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 1:08 pm to
Certain directors have fan bases. The studio can sell the movie based more on the director than any actor. Do you think Oppenheimer would have made more money if it was marketed as the new Cillian Murphy movie?
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 1:12 pm to
The title of the movie wasn’t
“Christopher Nolan Presents: Oppenheimer”
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
24415 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 1:40 pm to
my favorite is

"From the creative mind of Tiger1242"

"From the people who Brought you "Made by this guy""
Posted by Josh Fenderman
Ron Don Volante's PlayPen
Member since Jul 2011
7045 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Supposedly it's to differentiate the films, like the 2006 "The Covenant" I'm not sure that's the case for Lee Daniels and uh, others

It seems this is the case for both the covenant and the butler. I really can’t think of any other movies where the official title includes the directors name
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77768 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:01 pm to
Even Baz Luhrmann never pulled that shite.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

after trying "the Interpreter" first


The Interpreter was such a strange movie.
Posted by The Quiet One
Former United States
Member since Oct 2013
12149 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:07 pm to
Video Game equivalent is this asshoe

Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
42291 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:10 pm to
it was marketed as the new Christopher Nolan movie
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17607 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:28 pm to
I like Guy Ritchie so I was more excited when his name was attached.
Posted by WaltWhite504
Member since Sep 2021
2108 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 2:54 pm to
In the late 80s QT was shopping Reservoir Dogs around hollywood as quentin tarantino's Reservoir Dogs and people would say WTF is quentin tarantino?
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33200 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

it was marketed as the new Christopher Nolan movie

Yeah, I mean, you are right. I guess it’s just semantics, for whatever reason it bothers me OK
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21958 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 3:31 pm to
After The Sixth Sense, we had to know every time M. Night Shyamalan was involved in a movie.
Posted by VinegarStrokes
Georgia
Member since Oct 2015
14184 posts
Posted on 9/27/23 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

I don’t know why it just seems like pandering to me


That’s the literal point of advertising for frick’s sake
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram