Started By
Message

re: Reddit user claims the real RT score for The Odyssey is only 56%

Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:08 am to
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86553 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:08 am to
Here is how I assume most people view RT scores:

You liked the movie and the RT score is high? Cool, my opinion is affirmed by most people.

You disliked the movie and the RT score is low? Cool, my opinion is affirmed by most people.

You liked the movie and the RT score is low? I'm smarter than the general audience.

You disliked the movie the RT score is high? I'm smarter than the general audience.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184079 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

I would like to hear your take on my hypothesis, please. Curious if there is a hole in it.



Your hypothesis might have some weight to it for a new movie, but what about a movie that has been out on streaming for a while? Plenty of people can stream it and leave a review, but push notifications are still weighted more than manual reviews.

I think that is the point the Reddit user was making by showing the list in the OP of older movies.

Obviously there is no way to perfect it, which again means all scores should be taken with a grain of salt.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63530 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

So if Rotten Tomatoes isn’t valid to you. And I assume for the same reason IMDB isn’t valid, what movie rating platform do you consider valid?



What makes you think a valid rating platform exists.

Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43261 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:16 am to
Odyssey Derangement Syndrome
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108729 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

What makes you think a valid rating platform exists.


So we’ve now moved to nothing with viewer scores is valid.

Look at Nolan, revolutionizing the movie viewing score industry.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52653 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:21 am to
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43261 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:23 am to
quote:

BTW, theater workers on Reddit are claiming that screenings are empty despite being sold out


Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9225 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:23 am to
Except that the Reddit poster claims that the “real score” of the odyssey was the 56% attained from the pull system. And the odyssey is decidedly not an old movie.

So that is very clearly not the point the Reddit user was trying to make.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63530 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:28 am to
quote:

So we’ve now moved to nothing with viewer scores is valid.



I mean, don't we really know this is true? There's huge incentive in making movies seem better than they really are while in theaters.

quote:

Look at Nolan, revolutionizing the movie viewing score industry.



This is retarded. Nobody says this is specific to Nolan or the Odyssey.

Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
3465 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

you mean to tell me that "The Woman King" getting 99% and "The Lord of the Rings" getting 95% is valid?

Probably if you only take into account the opinions of people who actually saw the movies. The Woman King has a niche market that likely and undoubtedly loved the movie.

Imo, aggregators are much less informative when you let biased individuals review movies they haven't taken the time to screen.
Posted by Handsome Pete
Member since Apr 2019
2662 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:49 am to
quote:

heavily biased toward opening-weekend ticket buyers.
You mean the people who actually saw the movie?
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
48408 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

You mean the people who actually saw the movie?
Why unjustly give more weight to reviewers that have seen the movie? That’s biased nonsense.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
8539 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:53 am to
What about the IMDb score?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66599 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:00 am to
quote:

"The Woman King" getting 99%
seems legit.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79713 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:04 am to
So the RT score on opening weekend is bias towards…. opening day weekend ticket buyers?
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
3465 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Your hypothesis might have some weight to it for a new movie, but what about a movie that has been out on streaming for a while? Plenty of people can stream it and leave a review, but push notifications are still weighted more than manual reviews.

You may wanna save your jihad for older movies then.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66599 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Probably if you only take into account the opinions of people who actually saw the movies. The Woman King has a niche market
So you're just making shite up now.
quote:

ATrillionaire
Oh, right.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79713 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:10 am to
99% of the 17 people who saw The Woman King loved it.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
3465 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:11 am to
quote:

99% of the 17 people who saw The Woman King loved it.

Don't think he understands percentages.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
60817 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:12 am to
quote:

The Woman King" getting 99%

seems legit.


The tomato score is not a big deal. Look at the actual rating critics are giving it. You can have a film with a 5.5 rating and that's a fresh score
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram