Started By
Message

re: Reddit user claims the real RT score for The Odyssey is only 56%

Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:04 pm to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85179 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:04 pm to
quote:


Imdb has had weighted ratings and power users since I first started using it in 2002.
look at the post I replied to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67233 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

It's very likely to make over a billion, so the goalposts had to be moved


If it doesn't, it means it underperformed. No one ever thought otherwise.

However, making $1B doesn't make something a good movie.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85179 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

No one ever thought otherwise.
My Twitter feed was full of neckbeards claiming it was "doomed" or "a flop"

So not "no one"
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67233 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

My Twitter feed was full of neckbeards claiming it was "doomed" or "a flop"

So not "no one"


Surely we're not going to pretend Twitter trolls are the metric. You can find people on Twitter who say literally anything.
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 9:10 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85179 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Surely we're not going to pretend Twitter trolls are the metric.
They are a data point against "no one"

And many of the thumbnails were youtubers in the Nerdrotic sphere

Now maybe the videos said something different, but they definitely had the words above in said thumbnails
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35401 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

They felt bad user reviews hurt Captain Marvel. They deleted all reviews made before the film dropped, and that wasn't enough. The MCU was a juggernaut at the time
Yes because it got like 60k reviews within a few hours of it being released, more than Infinity War, which was obviously one of the highest grossing films of all time and released almost a year ahead of time.

Like I don’t really even care because it’s one of the weaker MCU films especially during that phase which was peak marvel, but it’s silly to think that these weren’t a bunch of fake reviews. And people can still post them, they just don’t go in the verified audience score.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67233 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

They are a data point against "no one"


Not really. No one thinks I was talking about Twitter trolls. That is never a part of legitimate discussion.
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 9:37 pm
Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27964 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:37 pm to
We’re getting into the nerd level minutiae of picking apart a very good movie. Weird reflection of the times. The dude turned a movie about Oppenheimer into a monster. I enjoyed it and anyone sitting on the fence needs to watch it. It was excellent.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85179 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Yes because it got like 60k reviews within a few hours of it being released
So?

quote:

more than Infinity War
So?

There was a ton of excitement between IW and Endgame. And we were all told how amazing and pivotal her character was to be.

Unsurprising there were tons of people annoyed after watching that.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
28682 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 9:46 pm to
Yes Rotten Tomatoes is screwed. The older movie ratings are accurate but if anything woke comes out it's in the 90's. Amazing how they sold out.

Is there another alternative?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
72418 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:05 pm to
It’s not The Odyssey so we need another name for it….


One Beach after Another?
Posted by NighthawkDawg
Member since Jun 2026
260 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:15 pm to
Because it's an extremely obvious attempt at review bombing. You can stick your head in the sand and act like it's not a thing but it's extremely obvious it is.

On the flip side we also have hardcore fans trying inflate movie scores but that doesn't seem to be happening as much
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
26062 posts
Posted on 7/21/26 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

I didn't realize people even cared this much about RT scores
tbf I will gravitate towards any movie that has a low movie critic score and a high audience score. If it’s something that interests me I give it a shot in those instances. Those tend to be good movies that simply don’t align with the Pedowood agenda
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35401 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 12:24 am to
quote:

There was a ton of excitement between IW and Endgame. And we were all told how amazing and pivotal her character was to be. Unsurprising there were tons of people annoyed after watching that.
I mean IW made over 2 billion worldwide, and by that time, had been available for purchase and rent for many months and streaming on Netflix. It had 52k reviews on RT. Within hours of Captain Marvel’s release, it had 58k, and to this day it has 100k+ ratings while Infinity War and Endgame have 50k+ listed, while on IMDB they have 1.4 and 1.5 million ratings compared to Captain Marvel’s 664k and on letterboxd it has 2.8 million watches compared to 5.8 million for IW and 5.7 million for Endgame.

Like does it really matter? No. But from RT’s standpoint, this was such a blatant example and it’s obvious in the numbers, that they obviously had both the evidence and the incentive (like people do typically want to know whether a film is worth a viewing) to put a verification process in place while still allowing for unverified reviews if someone really wants to see them.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6322 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 1:44 am to
quote:

It’s not The Odyssey so we need another name for it….


One Beach after Another?


What do you imagine happens in The Odyssey poem?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
72418 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:46 am to
You obviously don’t get it
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 3:23 am
Posted by NorCali
Member since Feb 2015
1791 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:46 am to
Fascinating that the traditional or pre-2019 method is less than 1000 people whereas the new method from ticket site data has around 7500.
The other part is not sure if the reviews through the ticket sites even require you to have used the ticket to get the survey.
Regardless you can see how a Studio could bias these numbers in their favor.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35762 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 5:40 am to
quote:

You might want to try to understand what these numbers mean before you comment.


If the internet as a whole actually did this it would be a quieter, but much more lovely place.
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
24226 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 6:43 am to
quote:

We’re getting into the nerd level minutiae of picking apart a very good movie. Weird reflection of the times. The dude turned a movie about Oppenheimer into a monster. I enjoyed it and anyone sitting on the fence needs to watch it. It was excellent.


Yeah all of this argument is so stupid. Just see it or don’t.

I saw it and loved it and went back. Saw it again. Loved it again. It’s just a great movie.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
85179 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 7:38 am to
quote:

I mean IW made over 2 billion worldwide, and by that time, had been available for purchase and rent for many months and streaming on Netflix. It had 52k reviews on RT. Within hours of Captain Marvel’s release, it had 58k, and to this day it has 100k+ ratings while Infinity War and Endgame have 50k+ listed, while on IMDB they have 1.4 and 1.5 million ratings compared to Captain Marvel’s 664k and on letterboxd it has 2.8 million watches compared to 5.8 million for IW and 5.7 million for Endgame.

.
None of that is evidence of review bombing, that couldn't be more aptly described as profound disappointment. People were excited to see CM, and were disappointed, so they blasted it. It was the MCU's 1st real miss, in terms of quality. Not surprising people were motivated to voice their displeasure

The expectations were high based on MCU overselling the importance of the character.

If more people who disliked a movie rate it poorly, irrespective of numbers, that isn't review bombing. Verification was just a way to try an control public perception, and most importantly to force people to use Fandango (the owner of Rotten Tomatoes) to buy tickets
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram