- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you had to bet your next paycheck, which character is Sauron?
Posted on 9/26/22 at 7:53 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 9/26/22 at 7:53 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Most screen fights are bullshite, I assume you know that.
The purpose of that scene was to demonstrate Galadriel is more fluid and graceful than they are used to facing, and her sharing her knowledge with them. As you would know if you watched the series, those aren't Numenorean knights. They are raw volunteers.
Back to the topic of who's Sauron;
y'know, that Gil Galad comment just sticks with me. If I weren't already disqualifying him out of hand due to knowing the lore, I would be leaning that way.
He's done everything Sauron would want to get done, and he DOES act oddly at times. That little aftershot of him watching Elrond and Durin talk, that was intentionally suspicious.
He's there at the tree when it gets blighted, and he's the one pushing all the buttons. Like stated, get rid of Galadriel because she's searching for Sauron, lean on Elrond to break his oath to Durin, announce to Elrond that the Elves are facing doom. Pulls all the Elven soldiers from the South, just as the Orcs start to reappear.
Something is fishy.
added= we saw Saruman possess Theoden in LOTR. Now, Gil Galad is not Theoden, but Saruman is not Sauron, either. They couldn't be going that direction, could they?
I think another possibility, which technically falls within Sauron's known powers- he's among the Elves already, and is shape-shifting his form to do what he needs done. Advising Gil Galad at times, possibly impersonating him directly at times. Do we see Gil Galad the entire time from the group dinner, to his private conversation with Elrond?
The purpose of that scene was to demonstrate Galadriel is more fluid and graceful than they are used to facing, and her sharing her knowledge with them. As you would know if you watched the series, those aren't Numenorean knights. They are raw volunteers.
Back to the topic of who's Sauron;
y'know, that Gil Galad comment just sticks with me. If I weren't already disqualifying him out of hand due to knowing the lore, I would be leaning that way.
He's done everything Sauron would want to get done, and he DOES act oddly at times. That little aftershot of him watching Elrond and Durin talk, that was intentionally suspicious.
He's there at the tree when it gets blighted, and he's the one pushing all the buttons. Like stated, get rid of Galadriel because she's searching for Sauron, lean on Elrond to break his oath to Durin, announce to Elrond that the Elves are facing doom. Pulls all the Elven soldiers from the South, just as the Orcs start to reappear.
Something is fishy.
added= we saw Saruman possess Theoden in LOTR. Now, Gil Galad is not Theoden, but Saruman is not Sauron, either. They couldn't be going that direction, could they?
I think another possibility, which technically falls within Sauron's known powers- he's among the Elves already, and is shape-shifting his form to do what he needs done. Advising Gil Galad at times, possibly impersonating him directly at times. Do we see Gil Galad the entire time from the group dinner, to his private conversation with Elrond?
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:09 pm to Tacktheritrix
quote:
My money is on Gil Galad.
O dear god it better not be. That'd push me over the edge and I'd have to stop watching. I personally don't see them going THAT far of a deviation. I mean that's out there
If they did that, Hallbrand is pretty much guaranteed to be a good guy. You can't make a made up character a big hero and have the most powerful and truly good person on the planet at the time end up as Sauron. Ugh.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:21 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
First of all most of my comments are directed at the directors, Showrunners, and actors who outwardly lie.
What directors, actors and showrunners are on tigerdroppings? Go find somewhere else to bitch if that's who you're talking to. Just because you're a miserable human being doesn't mean you have to try and make others miserable you giant troll. You're a crap poster. OM hates the show and everything it stands for but at least he's having normal conversations. You don't even know how to have a normal debate with someone. You've made 1,000 posts about this show, not just Tolkien, but this show over the past month but you're so stupid that you've somehow convinced yourself that you have zero interest in it. It's embarrassing.
quote:
me the “you haven’t even seen it“ garbage. I’ve seen enough clips
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:52 pm to Scoob
quote:
those aren't Numenorean knights. They are raw volunteers.
Numenor already has a standing army. And having’ warrior’ Galadriel, an elf, train them & not one of their own is absurd.
She isn’t the scourge the orcs.
She isn’t the commander of the northern armies
Hyping up this ridiculous mythos of her being a warrior queen only makes things worse. And didn’t they just have a big rally were they weren’t even fond of elves?
And this terrible fanfic about Sauron and Gil- Galad… please. That’s as absurd as a Silmaril leaking into the ground and somehow magically forming Mithril .
These are children who hear only bits and pieces of a story and then play make believe to fill in the gaps. It’s so convoluted and forced while veering well of the established Tolkien lore.
You keep wanting it to be Tolkien and make sense, but it’s all gibberish.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 9:56 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
. You've made 1,000 posts about this show, not just Tolkien, but this show over the past month but you're so stupid that you've somehow convinced yourself that you have zero interest in it. It's embarrassing.
Who are you again? It doesn’t matter, I can tell that you don’t have the intelligence even after “a 1000 post“ to understand my position. Even after I’ve stated it crystal clearly multiple times. You just want your fantasy TV show and you don’t want anybody saying mean things (also true) about it and making you feel sad. Too bad.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 9/26/22 at 11:16 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:I don't think they flip the actual character, but I'm beginning to wonder if they play the possession/obsession angle like with Theoden.quote:
My money is on Gil Galad.
O dear god it better not be. That'd push me over the edge and I'd have to stop watching. I personally don't see them going THAT far of a deviation. I mean that's out there
You still need Gil Galad to lead the Elves in the Last Alliance, so he has to finish out good.
Being fooled or played by Sauron, might be the impetus for the later refusal of many Elves to follow him fully (Dagorlad).
Might also be a reason why what he's saying now, doesn't match up with what we know of lore... father of lies and deception.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 11:18 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
These are children who hear only bits and pieces of a story and then play make believe to fill in the gaps.
The bloody irony.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 7:30 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
These are children who hear only bits and pieces of a story and then play make believe to fill in the gaps.
Damn, that almost sounds as bad as just watching clips of a series and filling in the gaps.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 9:12 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Like they explicitly have stated they don’t have the rights to use the name Hobbit
Can someone link this? I keep seeing it being posted but can not find it out there on the web. Thanks
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:02 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Who are you again?
Someone that's posted on here a lot longer than you and someone people actually like on here.
quote:
TV show and you don’t want anybody saying mean things (also true) about it and making you feel sad.
I dont even care for this show dumbass. It's just meh. Tolkien is my favorite author of all time, I'm not going to watch something that craps on his work. There's a possibility they could still do that, but as of right now, it hasn't been all that bad. I know that though, because I have actually watched the show, unlike you, who has only watched clips. I can respect someone who has watched the show and doesn't like it or gave up on it. My best friend quit after one episode. But respect anything you say? Nah. Because you are talking about the show non stop (clearly a sign you have no interest in it right?) and and you have no idea what you're talking about.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:28 am to Esquire
A real tearjerker right there man. Get's me every time.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:35 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
These are children who hear only bits and pieces of a story and then play make believe to fill in the gaps.
1. That’s literally all the show can do as they are working from Footnotes in the appendices.
2. That’s literally what you’re doing as you DON’T WATCH THE frickING SHOW
This post was edited on 9/27/22 at 10:35 am
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:56 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
I can respect someone who has watched the show and doesn't like it or gave up on it
I’ll say it again because apparently you need it said again. I already know the lore. I already know Tolkien and the characters he wrote. I don’t need to see this garbage to know it’s garbage.
This was predicted three years ago. When they started production AFTER Christopher Tolkien died. Then it was confirmed when they fired Tom Shippey. You don’t even know who that is, but trust me, it’s important.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:04 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
. Then it was confirmed when they fired Tom Shippey. You don’t even know who that is, but trust me, it’s important.
I know whotf Tom Shippey is dumbass, I've even read The Road to Middle Earth and I already knew they fired him. But thanks for the breaking news from years ago.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:15 am to SammyTiger
1. Then they shouldn’t have spent $1 billion for a story they can’t tell.
2. That’s not literally what I am doing as I already know from what the show is about.
That’s what some of you Normies just cannot accept. It’s beyond you that anyone can understand the disrespect shown by Amazon without seeing ( or paying for ) this garbage.
2. That’s not literally what I am doing as I already know from what the show is about.
That’s what some of you Normies just cannot accept. It’s beyond you that anyone can understand the disrespect shown by Amazon without seeing ( or paying for ) this garbage.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:16 am to iwyLSUiwy
Yes, from years ago that’s how long it’s been known that the show was going to suck.
And guess what! We were proven totally right.
And guess what! We were proven totally right.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:26 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
I know whotf Tom Shippey is dumbass, I've even read The Road to Middle Earth and I already knew they fired him. But thanks for the breaking news from years ago.
You can’t even spell “who”.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:32 am to Philzilla2k
Whotf. As in who the frick. But good one, spell check burn!
Posted on 9/27/22 at 2:49 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Sounds like your opinion is, nothing should be adapted from books.
I’ll say it again because apparently you need it said again. I already know the lore. I already know Tolkien and the characters he wrote. I don’t need to see this garbage to know it’s garbage.
If you read the book, you know the tale already.
And unless you yourself do an adaptation (sometimes even then), there will be things that do not match what the reader imagines.
I think we all know what is happening here. People are angry that political issues and ideologies, and particularly some controversial or taboo stuff, are being injected into 'mainstream' or popular shows and movies. Disney seems intent on putting homosexuals in stuff marketed for children. Women are being shown as capable as men, often superior, in things like action (physical fights) where it just isn't true, no matter your beliefs. Political slants are usually left=good, right=bad.
And people are pushing back, and seem to have singled this series out to make their point.
But the thing is, this show has not been "woke". Galadriel's a badass, but there's a pathway to that... Elves have been established as far superior to humans in combat, Legolas with a bow and a couple machetes can kill 3 dozen footsoldiers and an elephant without breaking a sweat. Galadriel has been established as an elite among Elves. She probably can't take down a bunch of Elves, but should easily handle a single Troll or a half-dozen Men. After all, she's wielding a sword that weighs about 5 lbs, is far more graceful than any human (including world-class ballerinas or gymnasts), has been in her peak physical condition for thousands of years. If she trained just every other month, she still has far more skill than almost any mortal. If she trained regularly for, say, onlyh 100 years, she definitely would be better than any human... because again, her body is still ageless. You give her a thousand years to work on it, the disparity will become ridiculous.
There's nothing in Tolkien's literature covering her in combat in detail, but there's nothing explicitly saying she never did, either. And there ARE notes saying she was on site at several battles, and as repeated multiple times, there are passages that describe her as extremely athletic (an amazon), fiesty proud and defiant. And of course noted to be a leader who desired to rule.
It generally doesn't fit the normal impression of what we assume, but it does bear noting, Eowyn, a mere mortal and also a female from a ruling family, is a skilled combatant,... many of the descriptions of her mirror that of Galadriel in her earlier days.
Blacks have been cast, some people raged about that. Tolkien himself stated, when talking about Orcs, that skin color (the orcs often were black) wasn't relevant, that he focused more on "orc-ish behavior", and that there were plenty of whites (Englishmen) that displayed those traits. He made clear that he wasn't racially motivated, and that the orcs did not evolve into blacks etc in his intentions.
So, some of the casting is "inclusive", but generally has been done tastefully, and discreetly enough. Tar Miriel has dark skin, she also has straight hair, not a Fro. Nissa the dwarf is stumpy and appears to have some beard around her jowls... not a bad depiction of a dwarf. And her hair is braided. The old Harfoot dude is ... wizened by the sun, kinda leathery. They're outdoors 99% of the time, I've seen old coonasses with darker skin than some blacks.
There's no "culture" interjected in, so if you choose to let it bother you, it's merely because of their appearance.
I will mention, Hugo Weaving does not meet the 'high beauty' ascribed to the Elves in my opinion. Elves should by all rights all look like top supermodels, all way better looking than humans. There wasn't an outcry, and he did a good job. I would suggest, let's let these actors do their thing, and judge it on merit. The dude playing Arondir has been great, in my opinion; better than some of the white actors.
I understand the increasing frustration a lot of folks have, and also how some want to "fight fire with fire", but come on. Let's not incorporate cancel culture into our side.
Popular
Back to top


1







