Started By
Message

re: Game of Thrones S8E5 "The Bells" is officially the worst reviewed GOT episode yet

Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:11 am to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Regardless you are ignoring that the person she regarded as the closest to her essentially committed treason. The last person to tell a couple people that the king wasn’t the rightful heir was ned stark.


Is it treason for the rightful heir to tell people he's the rightful heir or for someone with a lesser claim to demand he ignore his birthright?
Posted by CajunTiger_225
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
9233 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:12 am to
Some of yall need to do a rewatch. Shes been talked out of doing what she did like 5 times over the course of the show and from what has transpired over the last episodes makes sense that she snapped and made a full circle. If yall want to bitch about something bitch about the damn bows. Some people really are just unhappy unless they can complain about something.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24837 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

After season 7 and hearing this season would only be 6 episodes

I think hearing that D&D made the decision to shorten both seasons despite HBO giving them more, probably made people hate them more.

It’s not just some people anymore. It’s a pretty significant portion of the fan base. And I guarantee even more people will be pissed after next week. This season is definitely not going to be looked upon very favorably. I personally found this episode fine as a stand-alone but overall this season has been a disappointment for me as well.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42428 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

It's not just the pacing. It's specific choices made by the writers.

Everyone's opinion on the last two episodes completely changes if they scrap Euron sniping Raeghal in episode 4 and instead have Daenerys attack Kings Landing exactly like she initially did but with Drogon and Raeghal. When Reaghal is killed during the assualt, she loses her shite exactly like she did in the episode.

Completely believable and much more realistic.


I would have been ok with that. But the betrayal factor wasnt there yet. That clearly was sending her over the edge added to the lack of love she felt from the places she wanted to rule or even love from the man she loved. There were more factors that led up to her madness than people are making it seem.

I mean if Jon would have just gave her the D then really everything would have been all good. He's an idiot for not hitting that.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41103 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:15 am to
Again. For the about 100th time. Nobody is arguing her snapping didn’t make sense. The argument is that the way they portrayed it and the way it actually happened was not written well and could have been so much better.

Criticizing the way something happened =\= criticizing the fact that it did happen.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Her doing horrific evil things to Cersei’s army would be in character... massacring the innocents, not so much.
But they purposely showed it from the perspective of the conquered not the conquerer. I’m sure it almost always looks that way from that perspective, even when the conquerers are liberators.

Besides, I doubt she was up there just picking out random groups of women and children like a sniper, and ordering Drogon to fry them, while enjoying their massacre. I think she was just seeing it as collateral damage after (in her view) they had time to leave the city instead of running to Cersei for protection.

Again. I see it more like our own foreign policy, a combination of warning the population of an incoming bombing nowadays and become collateral damage if they stay, with nuking—not once but twice—Japan to end their threat and ensure it’s ended completely by showing not only the capability of could be done, but the willingness to do it.

Of course, you could argue it’s not like the nuking because they had already surrendered; however, unlike Japan’s surrender which was to end a war (the threat itself), from her perspective, surrender was not an end to the threat since ending a war was not the sole (or even ultimate) goal; power was the goal and her goal for the entire series.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 10:18 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Besides, I doubt she was up there just picking out random groups of women and children like a sniper, and ordering Drogon to fry them, while enjoying their massacre. I think she was just seeing it as collateral damage after (in her view) they had time to leave the city instead of running to Cersei for protection.


If she wasn't massacring just to do it she would have only destroyed the red keep. We saw how easily she could have. Instead, she destroyed the entire city.

That was not collateral damage, it was genocide.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41103 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

But the betrayal factor wasnt there yet. That clearly was sending her over the edge added to the lack of love she felt from the places she wanted to rule or even love from the man she loved


What? In his alternate version, nothing else changes except that Raeghal dies in episode 5 instead of 4. The “betrayal” already happened. Basically have Euron snipe Raeghal while the bells are ringing and Dany has stopped fighting assuming they were surrendering. Her getting tricked again, Tyrion advice failing her for the final time, losing another child, then she snaps. That would have been 10x better.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50742 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I would have been ok with that. But the betrayal factor wasnt there yet. That clearly was sending her over the edge added to the lack of love she felt from the places she wanted to rule or even love from the man she loved. There were more factors that led up to her madness than people are making it seem.



I'm not changing a single other thing from those two episodes. They still execute Missandei, everything still goes down with Varys/Tyrion/Jon. None of those things are dependent on Euron killing Raeghal.

Hell, if nothing else Raeghal still being alive but Missandei still being a hostage makes Daenerys agreeing to the "parlay" make even more sense.
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11937 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I also saw Jamie's character development as a surprise instead of taking a shite on his development


My main problem with Jaime was how unimportant he was to the endgame. He could've died last season and the main plot wouldn't change at all. His only purpose this season was to kill fricking pirate pacey.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Again. For the about 100th time. Nobody is arguing her snapping didn’t make sense. The argument is that the way they portrayed it and the way it actually happened was not written well and could have been so much better.
But for many, this seems a lot like the rationalization of my fellow Cavs fans after the decision with the “it was not that we just lost one of the greatest players of all time, it’s how he did.”
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78444 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Nobody is arguing her snapping didn’t make sense. The argument is that the way they portrayed it and the way it actually happened was not written well and could have been so much better.


There would have been people saying it was telegraphed then.

Ned losing his head and the red wedding were great because they weren't telegraphed.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42428 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Is it treason for the rightful heir to tell people he's the rightful heir or for someone with a lesser claim to demand he ignore his birthright?


Well he was fully claiming for her to be his queen and that he didnt want to rule. So his queen essentially commands him not to tell anybody and he immediately goes and tells somebody.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41103 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:26 am to
quote:

There would have been people saying it was telegraphed then.

Ned losing his head and the red wedding were great because they weren't telegraphed.



No. A decent writer can write a better decent into madness and have it not be "telegraphed".
Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
25671 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:27 am to
quote:

lol at all the neckbeards pissed that their theories didn’t play out. Blame D&D all you want but this is the fat mans story and he gave them the ending


Yea, it has everything to do with expectations. The problem is we expected decent writing. It’s had problems before, but they’ve taken it up a notch or two. The theories had little to do with it.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Well he was fully claiming for her to be his queen and that he didnt want to rule. So his queen essentially commands him not to tell anybody and he immediately goes and tells somebody.


That doesn't answer the question. If him doing exactly what he tells her he's going to do is treason so is her demanding that the rightful heir not take his birthright.

You people are trying to justify her madness. The whole point is that it's not justifiable. It's the reaction of a lunatic when they don't get their wish.
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42428 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:

What? In his alternate version, nothing else changes except that Raeghal dies in episode 5 instead of 4. The “betrayal” already happened. Basically have Euron snipe Raeghal while the bells are ringing and Dany has stopped fighting assuming they were surrendering. Her getting tricked again, Tyrion advice failing her for the final time, losing another child, then she snaps. That would have been 10x better.



Im not saying it wouldnt have been better. It would have just been one more thing to add to it when I think there were already enough. But there were changes in that she didnt know about the betrayal until episode 5. Or after Raeghal was killed, either way you want to look at it. It had happened, but she didnt know.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50742 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:

There would have been people saying it was telegraphed then.

Ned losing his head and the red wedding were great because they weren't telegraphed.




Wat? The penalty for treason is death. Ned was charged with treason. They threw in the stuff about letting him take the black at the last minute as a red herring, but the main reason everyone was surprised is because the average viewer/reader thought he was a main character that had the plot armor that everyone was used to seeing.
Posted by CajunTiger_225
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
9233 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Nobody is arguing her snapping didn’t make sense

Yes they are? Have you read these threads?
quote:

The argument is that the way they portrayed it and the way it actually happened was not written well and could have been so much better

And yet few people have offered any ideas on what could have been done to make it better. The ideas that have been offered have been more problematic and more tailored to just what they want to see. I mean a guy in this thread who used the term "bad writing" over 20 times wanted a montage right before she burned down KL. A fricking montage. That's one of the laziest tools in filmmaking and would have been completely out of left field.


Since episode 1 of this season Dany has been turning.

What's more grand in portraying her fall to darkness than using her dragon to destroy a great city and kill millions of innocents?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41103 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

m not saying it wouldnt have been better. It would have just been one more thing to add to it when I think there were already enough. But there were changes in that she didnt know about the betrayal until episode 5. Or after Raeghal was killed, either way you want to look at it. It had happened, but she didnt know.





I mean, its not adding a single thing to it, its just delaying the timeline of one of the events until it would have a greater impact.



Nothing would have changed between any of the Jon & Dany interactions.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 43
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 43Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram