- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Washington Post: WNBA expected to lose $50m this year despite increase in popularity
Posted on 6/14/24 at 7:16 am to LSUPERMAN
Posted on 6/14/24 at 7:16 am to LSUPERMAN
They are paying arena costs but have none or little capital expenditures in that asset class. Only half play in nba arenas anyway from what I’ve read.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 7:46 am to jlovel7
ESPN might get better ratings showing corn hole reruns
Posted on 6/14/24 at 8:07 am to TROLA
quote:
Indiana Fever star rookie Caitlin Clark pushed back against online commenters who have used her name in discussions to denigrate other WNBA players, saying any racist or misogynistic comments are "not acceptable."
"People should not be using my name to push those agendas. It's disappointing. It's not acceptable," Clark said Thursday when asked about the comments. "... Treating every single woman in this league with the same amount of respect, I think, it's just a basic human thing that everybody should do."
Due to Clark's fame, along with being a white basketball player, her name has been brought up in culture wars and online debates, including why she was left off the Team USA Olympic basketball roster and reacting to a number of hard fouls committed against the rookie early in her WNBA career.
LINK
It's almost like she's speaking directly to the MSB/OT/Poli Boards
This post was edited on 6/14/24 at 8:12 am
Posted on 6/14/24 at 8:49 am to SPEEDY
Meh, I expect this will change in the coming years. You can’t expect them to turn a profit immediately.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 8:54 am to whoa
quote:
You can’t expect them to turn a profit immediately.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 9:00 am to whoa
quote:
Meh, I expect this will change in the coming years. You can’t expect them to turn a profit immediately.

Posted on 6/14/24 at 9:01 am to lsufanva
quote:why, they don’t have a WNBA team
Now include Canadian viewers into your numbers.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 9:21 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
It's almost like she's speaking directly to the MSB/OT/Poli Boards
She's being pressured by the media to side with the left wing perspectives commonly held about women and women's sports. The media always forces notable figures to take sides and especially so if there's a chance they may be seen as a beacon of light to the right wing philosophies and traditionalist.
The WNBA has always been seen a league of left wing LGBTQ women of color. This is the progressives home turf and Caitlin Clark's existence, even without explicit political allegiance, is upsetting their reputation as a feminist lesbian women of color owned league.
Her simply being white and not lesbian is an affront to what makes them feel comfortable.
To counter this the media will force her to say things that signal her allegiance to the progressive mafia, i.e. quotes about equity and gender pay gap and LGBTQ support. Watch, they'll force the struggle session over time.
It's like clockwork. Don't think for a second this isn't about left wing activists feeling their property is being threatened.
This post was edited on 6/14/24 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/14/24 at 11:42 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:Do people still believe Griner is a biological female?
And we traded a terrorist for a lesbian
Posted on 6/14/24 at 12:00 pm to coolpapaboze
Actually, I do now more than ever. Russia would have loved to have humiliated her during her incarceration. They didn't, so that makes me lean to she's just an unfortunate manly female.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 12:10 pm to auzach91
how many business out there operate at a loss and still pay people?
example - DraftKings reported a net loss of $802.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2023. Plenty of the employees make WAY more than $100k/yr.
$50 mil isn't that much
I still think the WNBA is pretty terrible to watch.
example - DraftKings reported a net loss of $802.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2023. Plenty of the employees make WAY more than $100k/yr.
$50 mil isn't that much
I still think the WNBA is pretty terrible to watch.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 12:35 pm to ks_nola
On a per player basis it is staggering to lose 50M
It’s like 500k per player down the tube.
It’s basically a UBI experiment with totally meaningless work required
It’s like 500k per player down the tube.
It’s basically a UBI experiment with totally meaningless work required
This post was edited on 6/14/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 6/14/24 at 12:58 pm to NoSaint
quote:
It’s like 500k per player down the tube.
Only 10% of revenue goes to players. So like 5 million split among all the players down the tube.
You seem to be of the belief the league exists for the players. It doesn't, it exists to make the owners money. They grift money from the NBA, Nike, other "investors", pocket some, and pay the players 10%, then write it as a loss.
This post was edited on 6/14/24 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 6/14/24 at 1:01 pm to SoFla Tideroller
I don’t know how anyone can see the video of Griner, topless at the pool, and conclude “that’s a woman”.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 1:09 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
the NHL is averaging 373,000 viewers on ESPN and TNT this season
OK, now add local stations and the national stations in Canada. And also compare attendance.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 1:16 pm to NoSaint
$50M is projected this year. from article "Commissioner Adam Silver said in 2018 that the WNBA loses about $10 million per year, that would amount to at least $200 million and upwards of $260 million in losses since the league's inception in 1997."
so 260 +50 = 310 from 1997 - 2024. avg out to $11.5/yr
12 teams x 11 players = 132
11.5 / 132 =$88k per player per year. this doesn't include every employee of the WNBA
draftkings has 4200 employees so just off 2023 numbers thats $190k per employee and its double that in 2022.
again the wnba is terrible to watch but the numbers don't add up for anyone to be mad it for existing. hopefully the daily wnba threads will stop since everyone thinks its so terrible.
so 260 +50 = 310 from 1997 - 2024. avg out to $11.5/yr
12 teams x 11 players = 132
11.5 / 132 =$88k per player per year. this doesn't include every employee of the WNBA
draftkings has 4200 employees so just off 2023 numbers thats $190k per employee and its double that in 2022.
again the wnba is terrible to watch but the numbers don't add up for anyone to be mad it for existing. hopefully the daily wnba threads will stop since everyone thinks its so terrible.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 1:24 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
counter this the media will force her to say things that signal her allegiance to the progressive mafia, i.e. quotes about equity and gender pay gap and LGBTQ support. Watch, they'll force the struggle session over time.
It's like clockwork. Don't think for a second this isn't about left wing activists feeling their property is being threatened
I can't wait to see them squirm when a trans dude wants to join the WBNA. That'll really tie their narratives in a knot.
Posted on 6/14/24 at 1:44 pm to Corinthians420
quote:.
You sound like someone who only thinks with his wallet
Why would you stay in a league that is intentionally trying to destroy you....even your own coach and teammates.
I was talking about quality of life.
Clark basically signed up to be gang raped in Prison by jealous angry lesbians. Who needs that? She had other options than to be abused in this racist, sexualized identity, jealous, toxic subsidized failure of a League with no likeable women that are relatable to the general public until she came along. Miss me on your argument.
This post was edited on 6/14/24 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 6/14/24 at 3:07 pm to SPEEDY
No shite.
The WNBA could sell out completely for the next few years and still probably have never turned a profit in its history. Hence why I get irritated at the people whining about contract differences between NBA picks and WNBA picks.
One makes a profit. The other is a charity case funded by the profitable one.
The WNBA could sell out completely for the next few years and still probably have never turned a profit in its history. Hence why I get irritated at the people whining about contract differences between NBA picks and WNBA picks.
One makes a profit. The other is a charity case funded by the profitable one.
Popular
Back to top


2








