- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

WaterLink
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 21065 |
| Registered on: | 9/28/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I do hope you realize the person you're getting angry about is not the person everyone else in this thread is talking about. Pretty sure Mike McDaniel has never been a coach with the Rams or with Brady.
re: Does anyone ever talk about how lanes olineman blocking schemes are part of the success
Posted by WaterLink on 10/6/26 at 3:18 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
the oline play under Kelly was absolute horrifying
It was even more shocking because that was supposed to be his forte with how many OL and TE he put into the NFL. When he was hired I thought if he could supplement his penchant for linemen with Louisiana skill position talent he'd have easier access to here, that combination could potentially be great. And that just never manifested and it's not like we didn't have highly rated recruits there either.
So glad that era is behind us.
re: Leaked text message debacle at Michigan: TE shits all over OC in group chat
Posted by WaterLink on 10/6/26 at 1:21 pm to SEC Doctor
Jason Beck, Michigan OC that Whit took with him from Utah
re: Leaked text message debacle at Michigan: TE shits all over OC in group chat
Posted by WaterLink on 10/6/26 at 1:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I didn't think Whittingham would lose the locker room in just 5 games after how respected he was for 20 years at Utah but here we are
re: Lane Kiffin called that timeout because the players asked him if he wanted to run clock
Posted by WaterLink on 10/6/26 at 11:46 am to JimTiger72
quote:
“The players” didn’t ask…. The officials asked him or maybe it came from McNeese, but that’s what got him fired up
I recognize that now. I started this thread on the scoreboard right after the game ended and the phrasing Kiffin used in his postgame presser (in post 4 of the thread) made it seem like the players asked him. It has since been clarified by Kiffin what he meant to say after this thread had already been made, others interpreted what he said in the original postgame presser the same way.
This thread should have stayed on the scoreboard and not moved to the rant and still going 3 days after the game but here it is I guess :dunno:
I also remember many people saying Texas A&M +8.5 was free money and Reed was going to run all over LSU again
quote:
My god how did so many people like this false information?? It was not the lsu players asking to run the clock. They would never ever ever ask lane that. It was the other team and refs who asked that.
I admit I interpreted it wrong. I posted the clip from his postgame presser and sorry but at the time it sounded like Kiffin implied the players asked him. And I didn't interpret it as "a running clock" I thought it was more the players asking do you want to run the play clock all the way down between plays, etc.
I posted a link to his press conference in post 4. Go to the 3 minute mark and the question was "you called a timeout in the beginning of the 3rd quarter and appeared to rip the players, why was that the message" His response was "I just wanted to make sure they understood. We were talking to the players in the locker room, and we came out and there was a conversation where they asked me if I wanted to run clock". So he had made a reference to talking to players and then the next sentence said "they asked me if I wanted to run clock", didn't mention the refs and didn't say "a running clock"
So sorry I interpreted as the players asked him but can you at least understand how I could have taken it that way with the phrasing that was used? I posted this on the scoreboard immediately after the game and I guess he cleared that part up after this had already been posted. Didn't really expect this to be moved to the rant and still going days later :lol:
quote:
and so you have not only LSU fans in the market for tickets, but lots of opponents' fans
For Texas in particular I had a feeling they would be bringing plenty of fans. Kind of the perfect storm of factors:
- Texas has a big loyal fanbase that travels well
- Been almost 75 years since Texas has played here. Tiger Stadium has a great reputation among CFB fans so getting to see your team play here for the first time in forever is going to be something many of them don't want to miss
- LSU has played in Austin recently and it was a great game and great scene where a lot of our fans showed up there, they got to see the 2019 LSU team grow and play at their stadium, I'm sure it made an impression on their fans. Their return trip was nixed for covid and now they're finally getting to make that return trip. I'm sure a lot of them had planned to make the trip here in 2020 and were bummed when it appeared they wouldn't be coming back here at all but now it's finally happening
- Both teams appear to be really good this year and it's a mid November game so the stakes have potential to be really high. The teams appear to be similarly constructed as well, both teams have a great defense especially the pass rush, Leavitt and Manning are pretty similar QBs, both dual threats with great arm talent but struggle with consistency at times.
- As far as SEC road trips go it's not too far. They play OU at the Cotton Bowl every year so we're the 2nd closest SEC true road trip available to them after A&M
Put all this together and you're going to have no shortage of Texas fans fighting for tickets and driving the price up.
re: Bet Baker wants to embarrass Sloan
Posted by WaterLink on 10/5/26 at 4:58 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
Dude hated Sloan while he was here.
Somehow I seriously doubt that. They coached at LA Tech together and Baker was one of Sloan's groomsmen during that time. Reunited here.
Now I'm sure there's still competitive fire from them to be better than the other now that they're on opposite sidelines but you guys need to separate how we feel as fans from how coaches feel about each other.
quote:
How many times has someone scored, on side kicked, and scored again with 2 mins? I don't know either, but I'm curious.
The Cowboys did it against the Falcons a few years ago. So there's at least one.
re: LSU , at 7-1, vs. Alabama at Tiger stadium at night
Posted by WaterLink on 10/5/26 at 3:42 pm to saturncube21
Bama and Texas at home in back to back weeks might be the most hyped consecutive home games in Tiger Stadium history.
Still a lot of work to be done if we're going to be 7-1 going into that stretch. The players and coaches surely aren't looking that far ahead, but we as fans can acknowledge how special those 2 weeks can be if we take care of business in October.
Still a lot of work to be done if we're going to be 7-1 going into that stretch. The players and coaches surely aren't looking that far ahead, but we as fans can acknowledge how special those 2 weeks can be if we take care of business in October.
Exact times get announced on Mondays so it should be out sometime today. It's going to still be in an early slot obviously.
quote:
2021 and 2007 Kentucky flashbacks are running through my head. Let’s not have either of those type of games in Lexington this time please.
Those were the last 2 Lexington games.
The 3 before were Bluegrass Miracle, the 2001 game where we had to score a TD with like 20 seconds left to win, and 1999 where they beat us like a drum (and DiNardo was a dead man walking anyway)
That's 5 straight games in Lexington where it was either a loss or requiring last second heroics to win. And keep in mind 2/5 of those LSU teams won the SEC and one even won the natty so it's not like it was trash teams rolling in there all the time. I'll believe this is an easy win when I see it.
Then there's Kiffin's history with Kentucky. He went 3-1 at Ole Miss vs them but the loss was the 2024 team which he had no business losing, it was his most talented Ole Miss team and a bad Kentucky team (this was their only conference win) played in Oxford, just an unacceptable loss from them. 2020 was an OT win, 2022 was a 22-19 win that I remember watching when Kentucky had Levis, and they were extremely lucky to win that game and were really outplayed the majority of it, I wanna say there was a controversial call at the end too. Last year was probably his easiest win at 30-23 but even then it was 20-20 in the 3rd quarter
Kentucky hasn't been an easy out and they'll be at home. This is this team's 2nd road game, and they lost the first one. People predicting an easy 3 TD win or something I just don't see it. Don't get me wrong, I would LOVE to see us just come out and dominate them and win going away. I just know we're going to get Kentucky's best shot and I just want to get a win however we can personally. I don't expect it to be so easy.
re: Did i hear right, already more rushing TDs in 5 games than all of last year
Posted by WaterLink on 10/4/26 at 1:40 am to saintsfan92612
quote:
2025: (13 games)
378 carries
1352 yards
10 TDs
3.6 yards per carry
104 rushing yards per game
re: Durham must be in doghouse
Posted by WaterLink on 10/4/26 at 1:25 am to moock blackjack
The first few games of the season, Gage was the 2nd RB and would come in anytime Jones needed a breather or when the 2nd string came in Gage was the next main guy out there. The past 2 games, we've seen that switch to Berry being the relief guy and main guy when the backups come in.
You can point to a few positions where this has happened since the season started. Kiffin doesn't write his depth charts with a pen, it is fluid and you can earn your way up. Berry seems to have done that over the last couple of weeks based on how they've inserted him the last 2 games compared to the first 3, although Gage's runs tonight definitely seemed like he wanted to prove he still deserved the 2 spot and he may get it back after that, even though Berry didn't do anything wrong either, I'll leave that for coach to figure out. And that's what I love about Kiffin's approach, Gage wanted to get his spot back so bad and he housed two runs like his life depended on it. It creates competition so the backups strive that much harder to do better, and keeps the starters working hard to keep their spots because their spots are not guaranteed because of some BS seniority shite, or you get paid this much NIL or On3 gave you this many stars out of HS.
I said all of that to say, Durham is just being outperformed by the 3 RBs in front of him. He's not in the doghouse, there's no vendetta against him, he may even have the best attitude in practice and wants to be better and is really coachable. They aren't trying to make an example out of him or any other ulterior motive you're trying to concoct of why he's not playing much. He is the 4th best back on the roster, so he's getting 4th team reps. He had 5 carries for 13 yards tonight. Gage had 6 carries for 110 and housed 2 long TDs. Berry also went over 100, and Jones had a quiet night but left early and has been doing his thing all season. Still had 16 for 79 and some good 1st down runs to make 2nd and 3rd downs manageable.
Durham just isn't performing as well as those in front of him in games or practice, and that's really all there is to it. That's sports. That's life.
You can point to a few positions where this has happened since the season started. Kiffin doesn't write his depth charts with a pen, it is fluid and you can earn your way up. Berry seems to have done that over the last couple of weeks based on how they've inserted him the last 2 games compared to the first 3, although Gage's runs tonight definitely seemed like he wanted to prove he still deserved the 2 spot and he may get it back after that, even though Berry didn't do anything wrong either, I'll leave that for coach to figure out. And that's what I love about Kiffin's approach, Gage wanted to get his spot back so bad and he housed two runs like his life depended on it. It creates competition so the backups strive that much harder to do better, and keeps the starters working hard to keep their spots because their spots are not guaranteed because of some BS seniority shite, or you get paid this much NIL or On3 gave you this many stars out of HS.
I said all of that to say, Durham is just being outperformed by the 3 RBs in front of him. He's not in the doghouse, there's no vendetta against him, he may even have the best attitude in practice and wants to be better and is really coachable. They aren't trying to make an example out of him or any other ulterior motive you're trying to concoct of why he's not playing much. He is the 4th best back on the roster, so he's getting 4th team reps. He had 5 carries for 13 yards tonight. Gage had 6 carries for 110 and housed 2 long TDs. Berry also went over 100, and Jones had a quiet night but left early and has been doing his thing all season. Still had 16 for 79 and some good 1st down runs to make 2nd and 3rd downs manageable.
Durham just isn't performing as well as those in front of him in games or practice, and that's really all there is to it. That's sports. That's life.
re: NCAA Sack leaders:
Posted by WaterLink on 10/4/26 at 12:20 am to saintsfan92612
Simmons had 5 sacks in one game, which is obviously insane, but only 2.5 sacks in the rest. Prince has been much more consistent and methodical with it. It helps when you got a guy like Deuce that can create pressure up the middle by himself so either you try to keep the middle clean or you keep the edge clean, not many teams are equipped to do both at the same time all game.
That LSU/Texas game this year is going to be a lot of fun. I can see that being another 2011 9-6 type of game. I feel like Sam and Arch are basically the same type of QBs too. Texas hasn't played in BR since the 50s, I think there are going to be a lot of visiting fans for that game so it'll be an epic pregame environment and the game itself should be entertaining as well as we're both kind of the same team.
That LSU/Texas game this year is going to be a lot of fun. I can see that being another 2011 9-6 type of game. I feel like Sam and Arch are basically the same type of QBs too. Texas hasn't played in BR since the 50s, I think there are going to be a lot of visiting fans for that game so it'll be an epic pregame environment and the game itself should be entertaining as well as we're both kind of the same team.
re: What an awful college football Saturday. D2 McNeese vs LSU. Really?
Posted by WaterLink on 10/3/26 at 11:37 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
I will say that playing a cupcake game in week 5 is extra dumb, and im sure most lsu fans would agree.
We played a P4 team to open the season while almost everyone else was playing cupcakes. Ole Miss also played a P4 team week 1, they're choosing to play their FCS team in November. By the way, so is Bama (Chattanooga before Auburn). We'll be playing a road game in Neyland while yall are doing that.
At the end of the day we're playing 9 SEC games, an OOC P4, a G6, and an FCS over the course of 12 games. Who gives a shite when they fall?
re: Lane Kiffin called that timeout because the players asked him if he wanted to run clock
Posted by WaterLink on 10/3/26 at 10:52 pm to PassGassed
quote:
Any video of this?
The 3:00 mark is when the question is asked, his response follows
Lane Kiffin called that timeout because the players asked him if he wanted to run clock
Posted by WaterLink on 10/3/26 at 10:48 pm
Listening to his press conference and that was the answer he gave for why he called the timeout and chewed the team out coming out of halftime.
Sounded like the players wanted to get the game over with and Kiffin was pissed that they would even ask him such a question hence the timeout and gathering everyone together. "We decide when the game's over"
Sounded like the players wanted to get the game over with and Kiffin was pissed that they would even ask him such a question hence the timeout and gathering everyone together. "We decide when the game's over"
re: goodness gracious 700 yards
Posted by WaterLink on 10/3/26 at 10:19 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
3. vs Ole Miss in 2019 - 716 yards
We dropped in the rankings after this game btw. Because Ohio St was a more "complete" team per the analysts. We were up 31-7 at half and it was the week following the epic Bama game and the defense admittedly loafed in the 2nd half but the game had already been won by that point. The offense kept scoring so it's not like OM ever threatened to win anyway.
quote:
4. vs Florida in 2023 - 701 yards
Daniels had over 600 yards by himself in this game, 372 passing and 234 rushing, 5 total TDs. This was the game that won him the Heisman.
quote:
“All you need is 1”
That was what pissed me off the most. Like I get the defending your players aspect where he was coming from winning an SEC rivalry game. But the "did you see the last play, that's all you need" was just an extremely dumb statement. Like there's no way you can believe a garbage time run after struggling to run the ball all game means the running game is fixed. And it certainly isn't "all you need" :lol:
Popular
0











