- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is The Cy Young Just An ERA Contest These Days?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:18 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:18 am
Feels like the media has already decided to give it to Misiorowski, with Sale having the 2nd best odds to win. Miz is 12-5, playing for a team that's 29 games over 500. Sale is 12-8, also playing for a team that's more than 20 games over 500. Meanwhile, Chase Burns is 14-2 playing for a Reds team that's 5 games under 500 and he's 50-1 to win the Cy. Miz is impressive as hell and fun to watch, but since when are wins and losses not a factor?
ERA
Misiorowski 1.75
Sale 2.16
Burns 2.47
ERA
Misiorowski 1.75
Sale 2.16
Burns 2.47
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:35 am to WonPercent
quote:
Miz is 12-5, playing for a team that's 29 games over 500. Sale is 12-8, also playing for a team that's more than 20 games over 500. Meanwhile, Chase Burns is 14-2 playing for a Reds team that's 5 games under 500 and he's 50-1 to win the Cy
How much run support are they getting?
quote:I get it all pitchers want to win, but it’s a team sport
since when are wins and losses not a factor?
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:52 am to WonPercent
why would pitcher wins and losses have any factor at all? Are you some kind of mentally ill beta cuck?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:57 am to ZOU
Yeah, you're right, wins and losses don't matter at all in sports. Dumb arse pos.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:57 am to WonPercent
quote:
but since when are wins and losses not a factor?
Since it was discovered that it’s the absolute worst way to determine how good a pitcher is
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:14 pm to WonPercent
quote:
Yeah, you're right, wins and losses don't matter at all in sports. Dumb arse pos
You’re an unathletic low test slob who doesn’t even understand how pitcher wins and losses work. Back to the bedroom, Herald is waiting to film you and your tranny husband.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:44 pm to WonPercent
ERA seems like a pretty decent way to look at it unless a pitcher just has a bunch of defenders behind him with really shitty range.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:00 pm to WonPercent
quote:
Yeah, you're right, wins and losses don't matter at all in sports. Dumb arse pos.
Season remains to be played, but are two additional wins really that relevant when one guy is clearly better in virtually every category.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:10 pm to WonPercent
Being able to win games 5-4 when you don't have your best stuff is more important then losing games 1-0 when you do.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:11 pm to Zendog
quote:
Being able to win games 5-4 when you don't have your best stuff is more important then losing games 1-0 when you do.
What if you don’t have your best stuff and lose 4-0. Where does that rank
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:18 pm to WonPercent
Miz and Sale also have more strikeouts, fewer walks, and lower WHIP than Burns.
I think Burns' odds are more to do with the season the Miz is having opposed to a slight on Burns. Miz is beating him is pretty much every category.
I think Burns' odds are more to do with the season the Miz is having opposed to a slight on Burns. Miz is beating him is pretty much every category.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:36 pm to ZOU
quote:
Back to the bedroom, Herald is waiting to film you and your tranny husband.
Some of yall think about tranny stuff way too much.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:28 pm to WonPercent
It is an individual award. Wins are more of a team stat. Burns is getting the 3rd most run support (per 27 innings) of any starting pitcher. He's getting a full run more per game than Sale and 1.5 more than Misiorowski.
Wins should factor in. But it shouldn't be the biggest factor in an individual award
Wins should factor in. But it shouldn't be the biggest factor in an individual award
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:40 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
find a way to win
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:47 pm to Zendog
quote:
find a way to win
I’ll go a step further… a pitcher shouldn’t get credit for a win or loss if unearned runs affected the outcome
He shouldn’t get credit for a win if the offense scored 7+ runs, and shouldn’t get a loss if his team scored 0 or 1
And you must pitch 6 innings for a win as a starter. A reliever must pitch 2 innings. Any pitcher who doesn’t get that in a game, the win shouldn’t be awarded
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:45 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Look at that dude's post history... he's just weird as frick
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:47 pm to cubsfan5150
Wouldn't WHIP be better than ERA to determine the best pitcher?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 4:07 pm to WonPercent
No, it's whoever the writers vote for. That's it.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 4:29 pm to WonPercent
The award is Misiorowski’s to lose at this point in time. He had the complete game one hit Maddux in June. He’s touching 105mph, his Cy Young moment came on Saturday when he struck out both Freeman and Ohtani on 7 pitches with the bases loaded and overall he wasn’t locked in during that start. He’s getting all the attention as his starts have become must see TV. That’s who will get the votes.
A no hitter with him is almost inevitable at this point.
A no hitter with him is almost inevitable at this point.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:41 pm to sms151t
quote:
Wouldn't WHIP be better than ERA to determine the best pitcher?
No, there’s really no one stat to determine best pitcher.
To determine best pitcher, you’d need to evaluate strikeout rate, walk rate & hard hit rate.
Popular
Back to top

13







