- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andruw Jones: Hall of Famer?
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:02 am to Pilot Tiger
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:02 am to Pilot Tiger
quote:
that's not an argument I've made
Doesn't fit with:
quote:
considering guys like Mazeroski and Lloyd Waner are in
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:04 am to Sophandros
that was said in response to YOUR statement, NOT in defense of why AJ should be in the HOF
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:08 am to Baloo
quote:
Mazeroski is unquestionably the best defensive 2nd basemen of all time. He's the best guy at a critical defensive position, and he hit one of the biggest home runs in baseball history. Maz is borderline, but I think he's in on merit.
Whats his stats look like?
Again it's one hell of a combo for Andruw if he can achieve the 500 club to pair with his 10 gold gloves.
What if Atlanta hadn't choked away a world series.. would that make a difference if he was a world series winner? The man has a silver slugger just like Ozzie Smith. I want to see how it all plays out.. This is kind of a pointless thing to debate right now.
In 2005 he carried that Braves lineup. He was the only Braves player with more than 21 homers or 78 RBIs.
It would help Andruw's cause a ton had he won that MVP instead of Pujols and if ATL hadn't choked away the 96 world series.
This post was edited on 7/9/12 at 10:14 am
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:12 am to SouljaBreauxTellEm
dp
This post was edited on 7/9/12 at 10:13 am
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:32 am to Baloo
When I think of Andruw Jones' career and numbers I think it would be a travesty to elect him to the Hall of Fame. I look at his impact on the game, and more importantly the success of his team, as being much less significant than a guy like Bert Campaneris. Campaneris' best years coincided with the A's five straight division championships and three World Series victories. He was better than most of his positional peers, and he excelled statistically in some catagories. Compare Campaneris statistically to Phil Rizzuto or Pee Wee Reese. If Campaneris' A's teams played in New York, I can guaratee he would be in the Hall of Fame.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:36 am to Poodlebrain
If he stayed in shape he could be approaching 600 HRs. He definitely was the best player at his position for the majority of his career.
But he isn't a HOFer. Hall of Very Good, yes.
But he isn't a HOFer. Hall of Very Good, yes.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:49 am to GynoSandberg
I am on the fence here....
Andruw was one of my favorite players in his prime.
A great defensive player with 30 homers and 100 RBIs for about 10 years. Over 400 Homers over his career.
That's kind of the definition of Hall of Fame.
But I'm not sure he gets in.
Andruw was one of my favorite players in his prime.
A great defensive player with 30 homers and 100 RBIs for about 10 years. Over 400 Homers over his career.
That's kind of the definition of Hall of Fame.
But I'm not sure he gets in.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:03 am to Hoyt
David Ortiz isn't going into the HoF either.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 12:30 pm to SouljaBreauxTellEm
Not to make this about Maz, but…
He hit 260/299/367 in one of the most defensively oriented eras in history. Those aren’t good numbers, even with an adjustment, but he did hit 138 homers. He also is #1 in Zone Runs for a 2nd basemen, and he’s widely regarded as the best double play pivot ever (and numbers back it up). His only competition on the pivot is Willie Randolph and his only competition for fielding is Frank White. And frankly, neither of those guys hit much better than Maz. And Maz was better all around than either of them in the field.
Maz also hit 323/364/581 career in the postseason. He won two World Series rings, and the one he won in 1960 was largely due to his heroics. He won the Series with his home run, and he was probably the Pirates best player all season long (yes, even over Clemente once you value defense, and Clemente was no slouch in the field to say the least). He picked a good year to hit 11 homers.
He also had a short peak, but he made seven All-Star Games (technically 10, but let’s not talk about the two games things – but he made them both each year they did it), back when making the AS Game actually meant something.
He was widely considered the best 2B in the game, over Nellie Fox, and he won a Player of the Year Award in 1960 (though not the MVP). I think he needs his 1960 heroics and that homer to get in, but it props up a borderline resume. Flags fly forever. Defense matters more at second than anywhere except short and catcher, and he’s the best defensive player ever with decent hitting stats, a superb 1960 season, and an awesome postseason resume. That’s enough to get in the Veteran’s backdoor.
When Jones lifts his game in the postseason and hits one of the greatest hits in history, then he'll get the bonus points, too.
He hit 260/299/367 in one of the most defensively oriented eras in history. Those aren’t good numbers, even with an adjustment, but he did hit 138 homers. He also is #1 in Zone Runs for a 2nd basemen, and he’s widely regarded as the best double play pivot ever (and numbers back it up). His only competition on the pivot is Willie Randolph and his only competition for fielding is Frank White. And frankly, neither of those guys hit much better than Maz. And Maz was better all around than either of them in the field.
Maz also hit 323/364/581 career in the postseason. He won two World Series rings, and the one he won in 1960 was largely due to his heroics. He won the Series with his home run, and he was probably the Pirates best player all season long (yes, even over Clemente once you value defense, and Clemente was no slouch in the field to say the least). He picked a good year to hit 11 homers.
He also had a short peak, but he made seven All-Star Games (technically 10, but let’s not talk about the two games things – but he made them both each year they did it), back when making the AS Game actually meant something.
He was widely considered the best 2B in the game, over Nellie Fox, and he won a Player of the Year Award in 1960 (though not the MVP). I think he needs his 1960 heroics and that homer to get in, but it props up a borderline resume. Flags fly forever. Defense matters more at second than anywhere except short and catcher, and he’s the best defensive player ever with decent hitting stats, a superb 1960 season, and an awesome postseason resume. That’s enough to get in the Veteran’s backdoor.
When Jones lifts his game in the postseason and hits one of the greatest hits in history, then he'll get the bonus points, too.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 2:17 pm to Hoyt
No way. He started his career off great but has dwindled as of late
Posted on 7/9/12 at 2:35 pm to Sophandros
quote:
And both of those guys made highlight plays because they were often out of position when the ball was hit and they HAD to make those plays.
I say no to the hall of fame but you can't doubt his defensive prowess. He had an insane ability to get a great jump on the ball, turn his back to the ball, run to the spot he thought the ball would come down, turn around, and be waiting on it. He made difficult plays look routine and would run down almost everything else. Greg Maddux use to say that Andruw would save 2-3 runs every single game. He played really shallow to take away some otherwise routine hits with full confidence he could get to anything over his head, and more often than not, he did. Everything about your opinion is completely ignorant.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 4:56 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
If (his) teams played in New York
This is criterion 1-A for 95% of HoF voters.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 4:57 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
If he stayed in shape
This is a key point.
He was lazy and showed no dedication to improve either his condition or his game.
Not a HoF'er in my mind for that reason alone.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 6:23 pm to beatbammer
Not saying AJ is a HOFer but by that criteria babe Ruth wouldn't be in.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 8:29 pm to motorbreath
Babe may have been out of shape, drunk, womanizer, but he was dedicated to be the best in the game at least
Posted on 7/9/12 at 8:46 pm to motorbreath
quote:
Not saying AJ is a HOFer but by that criteria babe Ruth wouldn't be in.
Here are two sets of stats (career BA, HR 162 game avg, RBI 162 game avg, OPS 162 game avg):
.342, 46, 143, 1.164
.256, 32, 96, 0.827
Which of the two players above do you believe might have seen the most value out of conditioning and working on his game in the offseason?
Posted on 7/18/12 at 6:11 pm to weptiger
Bumping the thread 9 days later? Woah 
Popular
Back to top


1







