- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2022 Formula 1 Season Thread
Posted on 3/21/22 at 12:03 am to BuckyCheese
Posted on 3/21/22 at 12:03 am to BuckyCheese
quote:Absolutely. It does stand to reason that he'd round up into better form the longer he's back in an F1 car after being away, though.
One thing to remember is Mags was twice dropped by F1 teams. Including Haas. While he is definitely a feel good story, and I'm pulling for him, he is not among the very best drivers on the grid. He's probably close to Perez who no one thinks is a number one driver for a top team.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 12:16 am to Obtuse1
So it's just a futile argument. If him and another WDC managed to win in the car then the car isn't worthy.
I think we are all in agreement that in recent history we haven't seen a driver have the ability to elevate a car from mid-pack to consistent winner just on driving ability alone.
It's an absurd metric to hold a driver to.
I think we are all in agreement that in recent history we haven't seen a driver have the ability to elevate a car from mid-pack to consistent winner just on driving ability alone.
It's an absurd metric to hold a driver to.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:14 am to fightin tigers
I didn’t watch on ESPN/Sky… But are the graphics the same that F1 is using on the app? If so, I agree, I do not like them.
Looks like they tried to go to trendy and future. Last years graphics/charts were perfect.
Looks like they tried to go to trendy and future. Last years graphics/charts were perfect.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:36 am to Lsut81
It would be refreshing for me to find an F1 review video that was narrated by someone with a Southern accent, or even American. This sounds silly I know, and I know it is a European sport. Just would be a nice change of pace from everything being British.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 6:46 am to fightin tigers
quote:
I think we are all in agreement that in recent history we haven't seen a driver have the ability to elevate a car from mid-pack to consistent winner just on driving ability alone.
That is my exact point. Even God can't win in a mid-pack car at least without unusual circumstances which occasionally occur or the mid-pack cars are closer in performance to the front runners since at least the early 70s. It likely goes back to 1950 but I have never tried to dig out that data. The key is it isn't a dig against Hamilton, or any other driver that couldn't manage the feat a car has a performance envelope that is a hard wall. A decent driver in a great car will outperform a great driver in a merely decent car. That being said the best drivers usually end up at the best teams and the best teams usually produce the best cars with the odd outlier like Brawn's transformation of Honda in a year.
Hopefully, that is done and dusted because I think it was either using a different lens on the issue or simply having a different definition of mid-pack. The former actually has us in agreement and the latter just has us at a agree to disagree impasse.
Starting my post-race data dive I discovered what almost feels like an anomaly, something I don't ever remember seeing. Take a look at these two FIA reports with sector times and speed traps.
Compare Leclerc's sector times to Verstappen's then look at their max speeds, especially the speed trap. Despite a 25 kph advantage at the front straight speed trap Max was never able to equal any of Charles's best sector times. Obviously, Charles was so slow because he was the only driver on the grid that never had DRS during the race (on the main straight he did in the second DRS zone the time Max passed him). That is an incredible amount of time to make up. I have yet to sit down with the lap time heat map and figure out if Max ever had light fuel, fresh uncycled softs, and DRS at any point and see exactly when Charle's fast sectors were but I am guessing it was on the restart. In the end I think there is more to the story but it just strikes me as odd.
BTW we may NOT have a GP next week. There was a missile attack from Yemen aimed at the Jeddah area yesterday. So far Domenicali is holding strong.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 7:04 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 7:17 am to Obtuse1
Its a dam shame Haas's online gear store doesn't work. They are losing easy Merch money this morning, lord knows i want a shirt at least
Posted on 3/21/22 at 7:37 am to Obtuse1
Yeah, that wouldn’t be cool to have missiles coming during a GP weekend. Yemeni fundamentalists probably are t F1 fans.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 8:21 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
quote:Absolutely. But do they cannibalize each other in the WDC standings?
the Ferrari pair look to be a more formidable foe for the constructor championship
Posted on 3/21/22 at 9:14 am to Obtuse1
Looking at the finish line speeds versus the speed trap is telling me Ferrari teams were running a bit more wing than the RB's or the RB's have more top end horsepower while the Ferrari's have more mid range.
Either way, it appears the Ferrari's are better on shorter straights, as seen by Mags being #1 on intermediate 1 while the RB's dominated the absolute top speed.
Also comparing the finish line speed to top end Bottas was 5.3 KPH faster than Max at the line while being down 3.8kph at the big end.
Intermediate 2 is interesting as the top of that list were well down in intermediate 1.
eta-Looking at the track map I'm not seeing the locations of the Inter 1 or 2 for the speeds.
Either way, it appears the Ferrari's are better on shorter straights, as seen by Mags being #1 on intermediate 1 while the RB's dominated the absolute top speed.
Also comparing the finish line speed to top end Bottas was 5.3 KPH faster than Max at the line while being down 3.8kph at the big end.
Intermediate 2 is interesting as the top of that list were well down in intermediate 1.
eta-Looking at the track map I'm not seeing the locations of the Inter 1 or 2 for the speeds.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 9:30 am
Posted on 3/21/22 at 10:34 am to Obtuse1
quote:
BTW we may NOT have a GP next week. There was a missile attack from Yemen aimed at the Jeddah area yesterday. So far Domenicali is holding strong
Well that would certainly add some additional spice to the event. F1 is on a roll right now, wouldn't want to lose momentum.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 10:37 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
season over already?


Posted on 3/21/22 at 10:59 am to busbeepbeep
I didn't realize F1 also had "on pace for..." over-reactions as well 
Posted on 3/21/22 at 12:09 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
BTW we may NOT have a GP next week. There was a missile attack from Yemen aimed at the Jeddah area yesterday. So far Domenicali is holding strong.
The Jeddah track is only slightly more dangerous with the threat of cruise missiles. That track is a death trap. Made for a hell of race last year, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a fatality on it in F1 or any other type of racing.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:09 pm to BottomlandBrew
Motorsports.com reporting RBR insiders have said it wasn't a spec fuel pump failure. No word on what it was.
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:11 pm to BottomlandBrew
Over/Under 1.5 red flags this Sunday?
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:22 pm to fightin tigers
With them saying the AT failure was unrelated and both Red Bull cars suffering similar failures a very short time apart I'm starting to assume the obvious.
They didn't run enough fuel, did they?
I mean, it would make sense that Max ran out first since he was pushing harder, then Sergio a short while later.
They didn't run enough fuel, did they?
I mean, it would make sense that Max ran out first since he was pushing harder, then Sergio a short while later.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:27 pm to YOURADHERE
Maybe ran enough fuel, but the placement of the pump couldn't get it all. Max's reaction in the garage made it look like someone told him he ain't got no gas.
With the weight savings talk I could see this happening.
Also, these new fuels getting hot could change what the teams know about them. Could really change what the pumps can handle.
With the weight savings talk I could see this happening.
Also, these new fuels getting hot could change what the teams know about them. Could really change what the pumps can handle.
This post was edited on 3/21/22 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:28 pm to YOURADHERE
If they ran out of gas that should have been announced by F1 as they wouldn't have any gas left for the post race test.
I think they are required to have at least 1 liter left in the car for testing.
Now if they fricked up the design to the point it won't pick up everything in the tank....
I think they are required to have at least 1 liter left in the car for testing.
Now if they fricked up the design to the point it won't pick up everything in the tank....
Posted on 3/21/22 at 1:31 pm to YOURADHERE
quote:I would have LOVED to have been a fly on the wall when they had to admit this to Max if this is true.
They didn't run enough fuel, did they?
Posted on 3/21/22 at 3:12 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
If they ran out of gas that should have been announced by F1 as they wouldn't have any gas left for the post race test.
Reading the race scrutineering document, they didn't even check Max or Checo. They only took a fuel sample from Zhou's car.
Popular
Back to top



0








