- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: LSU 4th most valuable college football brand, valuation exceeds $1.5B
Posted on 1/18/26 at 6:04 pm to crotiger0307
Posted on 1/18/26 at 6:04 pm to crotiger0307
quote:It was just a few Pumptards spewing out their defiant ""Brian Kelly isn't going Anywhere" BS the week before the A&M game and saying that anybody who didn't agree with them were "Miserable."
But this board swore up and down that we couldn’t afford BK’s buyout? Lol
Posted on 1/18/26 at 6:07 pm to MrWalkingMan
WSJ is suspect. Can't even spell Louisiana correctly.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:06 pm to PurpleDragon
quote:
UT revenue $80mil more than 2nd place
One of these days im gonna figure out how they do it. I get the overall prestige of the university and its ability to compete in any sport but I have just not ever been able to discern how they dwarf everyone else so much. What are they doing different to lower costs?
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:09 pm to MrWalkingMan
FAKE news ! Especially since a well-known publication would spell Louisiana wrong. Just saying!

Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:16 pm to blackandgolddude
quote:
Where is Ole Miss?
Somewhere well behind Colorado
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:22 pm to MrWalkingMan
This is why 30 million on the roster is a drop in the bucket. It’s entirely sustainable. Heck we could spend $200 million and it be sustainable.
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:43 pm to lsufanva
quote:
One of these days im gonna figure out how they do it. I get the overall prestige of the university and its ability to compete in any sport but I have just not ever been able to discern how they dwarf everyone else so much. What are they doing different to lower costs?
What does revenue have to do with costs?
Posted on 1/18/26 at 7:49 pm to MrWalkingMan
Valuation off revenue is a waste of time. Would hope and assume they accounted for expenses in how they came up with the valuations.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:04 am to MrWalkingMan
After looking @ those total figures, rankings:
LSU @ # 4 is very impressive!
But if you add a mere $4k to our total = LSU moves up to # 3
** AND WITH JUST $50k (+1 dollar) MORE = LSU WOULD BE # 2 **
LSU = BIG TIME!! (How & Where do I send my check ~ Seriously)?!
LSU @ # 4 is very impressive!
But if you add a mere $4k to our total = LSU moves up to # 3
** AND WITH JUST $50k (+1 dollar) MORE = LSU WOULD BE # 2 **
LSU = BIG TIME!! (How & Where do I send my check ~ Seriously)?!
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 4:06 am
Posted on 1/19/26 at 5:21 am to MrWalkingMan
All schools on that list are either SEC, B1G or Notre Dame.
Edit: Colorado is on there at #20.
Edit: Colorado is on there at #20.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:10 am to MrWalkingMan
Where’s Indiana and Miami?
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:35 am to blackandgolddude
quote:
Where is Ole Miss? I was told they were the same level of program as LSU by their fans...
They forgot Kiffin’s opinion is the one that matters.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:42 am to paulb52
quote:
Where’s Indiana and Miami?
Playing for a natty, which I’d rather have than a valuation ranking. Texas has always been #1 in those surveys but hasn’t won a men’s big 3 natty in over 20 years.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:50 am to MrWalkingMan
Pretty damn impressive!

Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:53 am to lsufanva
quote:
One of these days im gonna figure out how they do it. I get the overall prestige of the university and its ability to compete in any sport but I have just not ever been able to discern how they dwarf everyone else so much. What are they doing different to lower costs?
I mean Texas is a pretty big market. Now you know why the Longhorn Network was a thing
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:55 am to PurpleDragon
quote:
UT revenue $80mil more than 2nd place.
The Texas schools are the poster children for doing less with more. It’s wild.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 7:47 am to MrWalkingMan
Kinda surprised the WSJ has difficulty with both spelling and ordering #s. One would think they would have software to catch such glaring mistakes, not to mention the team of proofreaders and editors.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 8:04 am to MrWalkingMan
The gap between 1 and 2 is crazy
Popular
Back to top


0







