Started By
Message

re: Unconfirmed reports that LSU athletics made a private equity deal.

Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:43 am to
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
19230 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:43 am to
quote:

LSU athletics made a private equity deal
Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
23293 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 1:04 am to
Wait you think folks should be able to hold parking passes without holding season tickets. That’s hilarious.
Posted by mike4lsu
Baton Rouge,LA
Member since Sep 2005
2242 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 4:17 am to
Private Equity might be the only way to sustain spending on a scale like we are spending right now on players, coaches, former coaches etc.

What is a head scratcher to me is, PE funds typically demand a massive return on investment (ROI) in the shortest amount of time. If they do not get that they will claw the eyes out of the business, break it into parts, sell it and feast on the carcass.

PE funds always demand more and more and more money..... till you cannot satisfy the need.

College football does not make money per say. Fans and boosters pay for the program and its success. For the fans and boosters, it is about pride, great place for networking for business. The benefits are significant but intangible. That will not satisfy a PE fund.

However, this means that tickets and season ticket prices will shoot out of control.

Prices of memorabilia, t-shirts, caps, jerseys, mugs with LSU insignia and in LSU colors will skyrocket out of control.

If the regular LSU fan gets priced out, the long-term health of the program will be catastrophic.

In half a decade we have gone from developing young men into the future leaders of tomorrow ...... to vulture capitalism.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38311 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:04 am to
What's to stop it from being sliced up if true? Once you let it's nose under the tent you have a hard time keeping the backside out.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 6:42 am
Posted by Art Vandelay
LOUISIANA
Member since Sep 2005
11551 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:09 am to
What will this do to other sports? Football has always supported loss in all the other sports at LSU.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49183 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:15 am to
quote:






Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49183 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:33 am to
quote:

this sounds like something Moscona would push

To be fair, he has actually said the exact opposite.

He said he didn't believe it would he private equity because that wouldn't be a first of its kind deal, which the original letter stated it would be.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7908 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 6:56 am to
quote:

quote:

what if the formal investment is from LSU's top 40 donors
What if everyone who said "NIL deals aren't self-sustaining" was right?

What if everyone who asked "Why would donors, who get nothing back, continue to contribute?" was right?

What if the top donors wanted to get paid back a little in return for their contribution?

What if those donors only wanted a small minority share of a commercial joint venture with LSU that pools commercial operations like ticketing, licensing, sponsorships, and NIL sales into a separate for-profit entity?

What if LSU keeps full operational and athletic control, including decisions on coaching staffs and student-athletes?
This thread shows that some people think "Private Equity" is the devil. That's probably why so many people are saying that Private Equity is not involved in this deal.

Everyone wants LSU's Big Donors to pay for LSU's NIL deals or player salaries.
Everyone wants LSU's Big Donors to pay for LSU's coaching contract buyouts.

Well, LSU's NIL deals total tens of millions of dollars, and LSU's coaching contract buyouts total tens of millions of dollars. We can't really expect LSU's Big Donors to contribute tens of millions of dollars and not get some return on their money. LSU cannot legally take a loan from LSU's Big Donors and promise to repay it.

So what if LSU's Big Donors get together with LSU. (Let's say that each individual investor has to contribute at least $100k to be involved.) LSU's Big Donors contribute to an entity (let's call it Bayou Equity) that agrees to give LSU $100 million. In return, LSU agrees to pay Bayou Equity less than 10% of LSU's sports future income stream.

Bayou Equity has only a right to 10% of the future income stream. Bayou Equity has no control over operations. LSU keeps full operational and athletic control, including decisions on coaching staffs and student-athletes.

There is literally no difference from what everyone wants and the Bayou Equity deal except that 10% of LSU's future income goes to LSU's Big Donors.

LSU gets its own angel investors and white knights to put a huge sum of money into LSU's coffers for 10% of its future income. LSU retains the right to buy it all back in five years.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:34 am
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79604 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:01 am to
Muh “sources”….
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61633 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Because their goal will be to maximize short term profits at the expense of everything else. It will start with support staff and go from there. They will not care about the brand, fan experience, or even on the field results if it increases profits.
yes, this. The Pirates owner actually does pretty well. Hasn’t had a winner in. Decades. You can put together a cheap org and still make money. That is their only incentive. Oh, it may sound great at first. But at some point in some boardroom it will all go to shite.
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:12 am
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163065 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:


This may be a way LSU can stay competitive financially in this new era. This could hold everyone (fans included) hostage. I don't have that answer. I do know that $20m+ football rosters every year are not sustainable by relying on Gordon and Graves.

The fact that we all need to come to grips with is that the LSU that we grew up with is never coming back. This is a business and is operated like so. LSU being one of the more profitable programs would be attractive to any PE firm with the capital to invest.


This

It is what it is, we don’t have the endless amounts of cash that some of our competitors do, so under the current model this was inevitable.

LSU is a pretty valuable brand and the better we are, the more likely PE is to get a great ROI. It doesn’t really spell doomsday for us. Feels gross but overall probably good for our survival if we want to stay elite
Posted by timlan2057
In the Shadow of Tiger Stadium
Member since Sep 2005
20563 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:16 am to
I think someone already said it correctly that LSU athletics does not make money per se. The benefits the big donors derive are largely intangible ie prestige, influence, the satisfaction of your alma mater winning, etc.

And right now, the big donors have as much or more influence as “owners.” “We either get rid of this head coach or I’m not giving one more goddamn dime!” And ADs and presidents scramble to do their bidding. But hell, at least their demands—while sometimes misguided—are geared toward the product on the field being as good as possible. I do find it ominous that these PE investors will no doubt be making demands to maximize the money in their pockets to buy their next super yacht the size of a battleship—and no doubt that goal will at many times be at loggerheads with the quality of the product on the field and the fan experience.

But I’m not a money mogul. I don’t really understand—if LSU athletics makes “pure profit” after expenses, salaries, etc. where exactly does that pure profit go? And the “pure profit” that these investors will demand for their profits—where exactly will it come from and specifically what areas and departments will lose this money under PE? There’s a finite amount. It’s got to come from somewhere.

And if I’m a big donor, I don’t think I’d like the new arrangement. I’d be like “frick this shite. I’m not donating millions for a bunch of it to go to private equity instead of the product on the field.”

Again, I’m not a money mogul but I know money does not appear out of thin air. For this initial rumored deal, those investors are going to want their 100M back and a helluva lot more. They don’t give a shite about LSU winning if it doesn’t affect the bottom line. Where will this money come from?
This post was edited on 8/4/26 at 7:20 am
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
9187 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Are we supposed to trust a media source named after an irritated a-hole?



It’s not named after you
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7908 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

So now we have stories from 2 outfits that have zero credibility.
JR Ball might be wrong about this deal, but he has plenty of credibility.

He was the Associate Publisher and Executive Editor at Baton Rouge Business Report.


He was the Managing Editor of NOLA.com.


He was the Executive Editor of Tiger Rag Magazine.


He was the General Manager of the Baton Rouge Bombers.


He is the Head Lacrosse Coach at LSU.


He was the OC of the 2022 LA state champ Catholic High lacrosse team.
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79564 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:28 am to
quote:

It’s not named after you


Oh look, you made a worse version of a joke someone else already made.

Quit stalking me, you fig.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38519 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:29 am to
quote:

LSU athletics has to source the capital to be able to sustain the program at a high level. There's only so many times they can go to the donor trough. Looks like LSU is trying to be on the forefront of these opportunities to be able to generate enough revenue to be competitive across the athletic landscape. PE might be a suitable avenue. Those concerts in tiger stadium were a great way to inject capital into the program.


so the PE group never plans to recoup their money? they never plan to take?

stop and think for a second....think critically...do you think that the PE group is doing this out of the goodness of their heart?
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
48339 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:37 am to
Huge arse buyouts need to become a thing of the past, as well.

LSU’s biggest issue presently is this
Posted by MicahTiger
Member since Dec 2021
719 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 7:49 am to
I hope that this is the case. Best case scenarios. Give the keys to people with vested interest, and who genuinely want LSU to be great. Probably offer them up another seat at the high stakes tables. Again, hoping that within reason, they still have a love for the university and will do what's right. Top donors probably all have other ways to make their money make money, so why not pool together those resources, and let that money make money also. I hope it's that surface level black and white.
Posted by CJ786
Member since Aug 2025
53 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:11 am to
Can confirm, I know a PE guy and that's exactly what he does. Guy makes $12 million a year though.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41490 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 8:16 am to
I think a big question. Is how are they going life this money.

If it’s for everyday expenses like NIL and salaries, then we are sacrificing the future for today. These costs will only be higher in future.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram