Started By
Message

So the SEC can penalize someone with no investigation, no evidence, and no right to defend

Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:16 am
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
10921 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:16 am
Sounds unreasonable.
Posted by HEtiger
Member since May 2008
2027 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:20 am to
Blow this conference up. Sankey has made it a charade.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
10990 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:22 am to
They have some serious anti-trust lawsuits headed their way regardless of what they try to to do LSU on Thursday.

Sankey is tearing the conference apart.
Posted by bayouboo
Member since Jan 2007
3701 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:24 am to
That is my whole issue with this deal. Where is the notice of investigation? Where is the hearing? What happened to due process?

Posted by Smokin Joe Dumas
Armchair QB
Member since Apr 2022
2489 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:26 am to
Posted by mikesliveisacheater
Member since Nov 2009
1617 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:31 am to
When Glenn Guilbeau is taking LSU's side, you know the SEC has gone full retard.
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11774 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:34 am to
Not just penalize. They’re trying to arrange it to where they can freely kick out ANY school of their choosing with no evidence, investigation or right to defend.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
49209 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

They’re trying to arrange it to where they can freely kick out ANY school of their choosing with no evidence, investigation or right to defend.



They can already do that; it just takes the requisite number of school presidents to vote for it. It's part of the charter, I believe.
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4693 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:56 am to
It is unreasonable and I would think the accused ( LSU ) has a place in court to defend themselves.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
64845 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

They can already do that; it just takes the requisite number of school presidents to vote for it. It's part of the charter, I believe.


Yeah, not without that institution filing suit against them. That’s why the SEC is asking the court to issue a TRO and permanently enjoin LSU from filing a suit. Personally, I don’t think a court will do that.
Posted by zappgator
Member since Oct 2006
1093 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:57 am to
This is a kangaroo court and a railroad job if there ever was one.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
90065 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:02 am to
I think it’d be great if LSU’s representative walked into tomorrow’s meeting and asked to speak first. Then call their bluff and state that LSU is willing to voluntarily withdraw from the Southeastern Conference.

You’d get a lot of shocked looks and stammering. “Whoa, whoa, whoa, let’s just hold on there for a second. Let’s not be hasty about any of this.”

These presidents want to flex, but know that any drastic moves will ultimately affect their bottom lines.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:34 am
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
165 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:03 am to
quote:

That is my whole issue with this deal. Where is the notice of investigation? Where is the hearing? What happened to due process?

Literally seeking emergency relief to deny LSU’s right to due process lmao. In the face of an injunction no less.
Posted by DeathByTossDive226
Member since Sep 2026
165 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

When Glenn Guilbeau is taking LSU's side, you know the SEC has gone full retard.

Something happened in July and we entered an alternate timeline.

This is not the universe I was born into.
Posted by mikesliveisacheater
Member since Nov 2009
1617 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:14 am to
quote:

I think it’d be great if LSU’s representative walked into tomorrow’s meeting and asked to speak first. Then call their bluff and state that LSU is willing to voluntarily withdraw from the Southeastern Conference.


I'd like LSU to walk in with an early termination buyout fee that they expect if expelled. If LSU tried to leave the Conference early then they would require LSU to pay a buyout fee. Why should they be able to kick us out without paying us?

I think LSU's share of the media rights deal for the remaining years of the contract would be fair.

For this Conference thing to work, there needs to be stakes on both sides. You can't have it where the Conference can hold an Institution hostage from leaving unless they pay a buyout, and the Conference is also able to expel a school without having to pay the school.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:20 am
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
8058 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:15 am to
quote:

So the SEC can penalize someone with no investigation, no evidence, and no right to defend
Yes.

As the Amended Complaint notes, Section 3.1.5 of the SEC Constitution and Bylaws grants the SEC's presidents and chancellors "plenary power and authority with respect to all affairs of the Conference of any type or nature whatsoever." The bylaws explicitly state that the leaders may take these actions "in their sole discretion." There is no requirement for a separate, trial-like hearing before a vote.

Thus, the procedure to issue penalties requires only two steps: (1) the SEC Commissioner issues a notice to call a Special Meeting of the conference leaders (Special Meeting is set for September 10); (2) at least two-thirds of the conference leaders (11 out of 16) must vote in favor of the penalties.

While LSU cannot legally block or delay the vote to demand an internal "fair trial," LSU leadership could use the scheduled meeting itself to argue their case informally to the other school leaders before those leaders cast their votes. However, I'd expect that the other 15 leaders would already have their marching orders or their minds made up before appearing at the meeting. I can't imagine an informal argument by LSU would make much difference.
Posted by mikesliveisacheater
Member since Nov 2009
1617 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:16 am to
Edit: Double post
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:18 am
Posted by geauxcoco
Greenville, SC
Member since Apr 2007
13371 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:16 am to
With a billions of dollars that are flowing through the sport every year yeah there’s an issue here guys.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79816 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:17 am to
It’s almost like they are acting like the NCAA back in the day…who would have thunk it…

It’s time to leave…
Posted by Tiger in the Sticks
Back in the Boot
Member since Jan 2007
2006 posts
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:20 am to
And they’re a non-profit, which requires them to act in good faith. This isn’t good faith by any stretch of the imagination.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram