1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not an excuse, a fact. The refs changed the outcome of this game.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're making no defenses of your arguments.
Oh my god
quote:
The crown is defined using facts. It's " the portion of the helmet above the facemask." That's not an opinion.
Whether it’s used in a tackle is fully subjective though. It’s literally a decision that’s up to the discretion of the official. That’s the definition of subjective.
quote:
This is the same silliness of you not understanding targeting isn't subjective, either.
Targeting is the very definition of subjective enforcement.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:56 am to T1gerNate
It wasn’t so much the refs in Lexington as it was the poons in Birmingham in the control room.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is like last night in the real game thread people talking about how nervous they were and I commented my heart rate just went from 79 to...80
What the frick kinda flex is this lmao
Stop drinking soda
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's irrelevant when arguing the refs were against LSU because that argument is based on their calls in real time.
I don’t think the refs were against LSU, but if I did, I could argue that refs understand impactful plays vs non impactful plays.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:58 am to RB10
quote:
Whether it’s used in a tackle is fully subjective though.
No that just requires contact, which is factual
quote:
Targeting is the very definition of subjective enforcement.
I'm describing the definition, which is factual.
We saw last night with the refs making a terrible pro-LSU call that the enforcement can be bad
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:59 am to Sun God
quote:
What the frick kinda flex is this lmao
Rational v. emotional, mijo.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is like last night in the real game thread people talking about how nervous they were and I commented my heart rate just went from 79 to...80
Do you think this is a flex? :lmao:
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No that just requires contact, which is factual
Still wrong.
quote:
I'm describing the definition, which is factual.
Still wrong. You’re literally arguing that targeting is a binary outcome, when it’s not. It up to the official to decide whether it was targeting, which is the very definition of subjectivity.
I’m done with you.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:04 am to RB10
quote:
You’re literally arguing that targeting is a binary outcome,
It is. It's specifically designated by facts.
quote:
. It up to the official to decide whether it was targeting, which is the very definition of subjectivity.
I already described your pivot. You can stop it now.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It is. It's specifically designated by facts.
And decided by subjectivity.
quote:
I already described your pivot. You can stop it now.
I’ve never pivoted. You just don’t know the difference between subjective and objective, or fact and opinion.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:05 am to T1gerNate
I know that on the punt return, an LSU guy was in position to make the tackle and was pushed in the back and out of the play.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:05 am to Tiger1955
quote:
I agree, the officiating sucked and was one sided. Despite that, the Tigers were still in a position to win, but threw it away.
I don't think that is completely correct. In a close game the refs can intentionally change the outcome with just one obvious "mistake". They don't have to make a dozen. This game had more than just one obvious "mistake" and all were critical.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:07 am to Sun God
You called him a predictable contrarian, and his defense was to proudly provide another example.
Even watching LSU has to become a TED Talk about how much more rational and emotionally disciplined SFP is than everyone else.
Even watching LSU has to become a TED Talk about how much more rational and emotionally disciplined SFP is than everyone else.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:08 am to RB10
quote:
RB10
Thanks to AI, I'm getting answers to your questions from just yesterday
Navy had no offensive penalties
Illinois had 1
Northern Illinois had 1
Indiana had 1
So not really an outlier scenario
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:09 am to jp4lsu
JP4LSU, LSU is losing games by coming out flat and not getting TDs on opening drives. LSU can change all of this by being the bully and punching the ball into the end zone on the opening drive. This sets the tone of the game and then pour on more TDs. Don’t expect greatness in any coach’s first year at the helm.
Geaux fighting tigers
Geaux fighting tigers
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:09 am to RB10
quote:
I’ve never pivoted. Y
You're pivoting from definition to enforcement
I already said refs clearly make mistakes, like how they made a terrible targeting call that was pro-LSU as my example.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:09 am to Klark Kent
quote:
Even watching LSU has to become a TED Talk about how much more rational and emotionally disciplined SFP erroneously believes he is than everyone else.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're pivoting from definition to enforcement
Wrong. I’ve been talking about enforcement the entire time. YOU keep talking about the definition.
Every rules is designated by facts and most of them are subjectively enforced based on the officials opinion about those facts.
You don’t seem to grasp that.
quote:
I already said refs clearly make mistakes, like how they made a terrible targeting call that was pro-LSU as my example.
Yes, I figured out your contrarian stance early on. I don’t really care about that.
I’m laughing at your notion that penalties are “facts” when they’re literally the opinion of the official.
The OPINION of the officials last night was that Kentucky committed zero offensive penalties for the entire game. We know that is factual because it’s literally impossible, but their SUBJECTIVE enforcement of the rules said they played perfectly.
This post was edited on 10/11/26 at 9:15 am
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
Last week
Indiana had 0 penalties (offense or defense)
Rutgers had 1
Air Force had 1
I haven't even gone through all the games.
Indiana had 0 penalties (offense or defense)
Rutgers had 1
Air Force had 1
I haven't even gone through all the games.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
Here’s my best SFP interpretation:
Three of your four examples had an offensive penalty. One isn’t zero.
The remaining example, if verified, establishes that it happened elsewhere. It doesn’t establish how common it is. What’s your denominator?
You’re confusing “not unprecedented” with “not an outlier.”
I realize basic statistical reasoning puts me in a small minority on this board, but I assumed you could at least distinguish zero from one. Apparently I overestimated your capabilities.
quote:
So not really an outlier scenario
quote:
So not really an outlier scenario
Three of your four examples had an offensive penalty. One isn’t zero.
The remaining example, if verified, establishes that it happened elsewhere. It doesn’t establish how common it is. What’s your denominator?
You’re confusing “not unprecedented” with “not an outlier.”
I realize basic statistical reasoning puts me in a small minority on this board, but I assumed you could at least distinguish zero from one. Apparently I overestimated your capabilities.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News