0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not an excuse, a fact. The refs changed the outcome of this game.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:37 am to T1gerNate
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:37 am to T1gerNate
Yes we got screwed...we will again. Quit overlooking glaring weaknesses. Our D is not capable of stopping teams with a pulse in must stop situations. Against OM, couldn't do it end of first half and end of game.....against KY couldn't end of first half, end of game, OT, 2 pt conversion. Quit making excuses. Just admit, the D isn't elite and Baker damn sure is overpaid. We also overpaid a QB.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:37 am to RB10
quote:
So, again, these are not facts. These are opinions.
Did you watch the game?
Do you understand the rules?
The targeting was clearly not targeting in real time
The TE clearly got a foot in in real time
Both are objective facts based on what happened on the field and the rules
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:37 am to stang14
quote:
Bama feels the same tonight also
Bama is a team who ACTUALLY got fricked by the refs last night
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Holy shite
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you watch the game?
Do you understand the rules?
The targeting was clearly not targeting in real time
The TE clearly got a foot in in real time
Both are objective facts based on what happened on the field and the rules
I understand the difference between fact and opinion. You clearly do not.
That’s apparently as far as we’re going to get.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bama is a team who ACTUALLY got fricked by the refs last night
Another opinion.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:39 am to Sun God
Did you watch the game? I was watching both at the same time.
You can go into the game thread and see me comment on all of these calls in real time, mind you. This isn't some revisionist history of me poking at people being too emotional about last night and ignoring rationality
You can go into the game thread and see me comment on all of these calls in real time, mind you. This isn't some revisionist history of me poking at people being too emotional about last night and ignoring rationality
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:39 am to RB10
quote:
Another opinion.
Sure, about Bama.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sure, about Bama.
Cool.
Still waiting for you to let me know the last time an offense went with 0 penalties assessed.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:41 am to RB10
quote:
I understand the difference between fact and opinion. You clearly do not.
The rule lays out specifics
The facts are clear
What's the opinion involved in the comment that the player who got the bullshite targeting? We have the facts and can see he never hit the LSU player in the designated area for targeting. Explain the opinion involved.
Same with a TE catching the ball and getting a foot down in bounds.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
Yep
Which is why I said “Holy shite”
Which is why I said “Holy shite”
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:41 am to RB10
quote:
Still waiting for you to let me know the last time an offense went with 0 penalties assessed.
Waiting on the answer to this, first
How are the refs against LSU when they kept making terrible calls to help LSU?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The facts are clear
What's the opinion involved in the comment that the player who got the bullshite targeting? We have the facts and can see he never hit the LSU player in the designated area for targeting. Explain the opinion involved.
There is no such thing as fact is subjective calls. Every one of them involves some form of opinion.
Targeting is a subjective call.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:43 am to RB10
quote:
There is no such thing as fact is subjective calls.
That call wasn't subjective
There is an area designated for targeting in the rules
We have the facts that the UK player did not hit the LSU player in that designated area
Where is the opinion?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Waiting on the answer to this, first
How are the refs against LSU when they kept making terrible calls to help LSU?
Why would answer your question when I asked mine first?
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That call wasn't subjective
There is an area designated for targeting in the rules
We have the facts that the UK player did not hit the LSU player in that designated area
Where is the opinion?
All targeting is subjective you fricking dunce.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:46 am to Tiger1955
quote:
I agree, the officiating sucked and was one sided. Despite that, the Tigers were still in a position to win, but punted it away
FIFY
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:47 am to RB10
quote:
All targeting is subjective you fricking dunce.
No it's not
It requires either use of the crown or hitting a player in a designated area. Those are all factual determinations. There's no intent judgment or subjective evaluation about the damage done.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:47 am to T1gerNate
This is an excuse. LSU had plenty opportunities to win and put the game away. It is not a "fact" to say LSU would have won if it weren't for the officials - all we can say is a couple of things would have played out differently.
This LSU team is not a playoff team. They're very talented and at times look like they can compete with anyone in the country, but they don't have it all together yet. 3 potential all-americans being injured also does not help.
But that's ok, it's year 1 under Kiffin. This thing will get rolling.
This LSU team is not a playoff team. They're very talented and at times look like they can compete with anyone in the country, but they don't have it all together yet. 3 potential all-americans being injured also does not help.
But that's ok, it's year 1 under Kiffin. This thing will get rolling.
Posted on 10/11/26 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No it's not
Yes it is.
quote:
It requires either use of the crown or hitting a player in a designated area.
“Use of the crown” is subjectively enforceable.
You can’t actually be this stupid.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News