- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Insider posted what Woodward did that has LSU and Kelly in this lawsuit
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:58 am to saint tiger225
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:58 am to saint tiger225
If this is a Landry plant post to make SW look bad it actually does the opposite. If something BK did was so nefarious & SW said, "frick this, your fired" it will come out in the lawsuit and SW looks like the adult.
0
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:00 am to YouKnowIt
Tom Mars is an idiot. We can name multiple cases just in the last 10 years
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 11:15 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:02 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK
Scott is a lot of things but he isn’t stupid and wouldn’t have “gone rouge”. This sounds like bullshite
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:03 am to ItsAWinForLSU
quote:
Why do a bunch of white collar, old men who are placed in their positions by the governor have the authority to make decisions about athletics?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:04 am to Byrdybyrd05
bullshite.
What a pathetic attempt at spin by LSU.
What a pathetic attempt at spin by LSU.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:07 am to TigerCub
Not saying any of this is true at all, but I imagine it’s not saying a public reassignment. He would have still been the HC publicly, but only as a figurehead. I guess that’s what he’s saying. Then once the ducks are in a row, fully fire him. So essentially make him a dead man walking. But Woody just fired him. Again, not saying it’s true at all, but I imagine that’s what the post is referring to.
Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise if it was true based on the shite show we’ve seen already.
Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise if it was true based on the shite show we’ve seen already.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:07 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
According to Tom Mars, who apparently represents a lot of coaches in these cases, no school has ever won the lawsuit when attempting to fire for cause.
How many have actually gone to court? Id laugh if its 0.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:08 am to The Egg
quote:
yes jerking off on the phone with a spokesperson for sexual assault victims is apparently not good
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:09 am to kengel2
Yeah Tom Mars can SABODs.
He's playing semantics. "No school has ever won a lawsuit." That's because the guilty coaches and lawyers settle before a judgement is rendered.
He's playing semantics. "No school has ever won a lawsuit." That's because the guilty coaches and lawyers settle before a judgement is rendered.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:10 am to Byrdybyrd05
Name of insider Byrdy?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:10 am to aruss15
quote:
We came multiple cases just in the last 10 years
What does this mean?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:11 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
so now LSU has proof of burden to fire for cause
Hopefully, our "insiders" are smart enough to know the difference between "burden of proof" and "proof of burden" (whatever the frick that's supposed to mean).
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:12 am to Byrdybyrd05
what is the source of this info? Are those your typos or his?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:12 am to Byrdybyrd05
This is ridiculous. This begs the question why Woodward wasn’t fired with cause then and why we are buying him out?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:13 am to TigerMan327
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 11:18 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:14 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
ccording to Tom Mars, who apparently represents a lot of coaches in these cases, no school has ever won the lawsuit when attempting to fire for cause.
I don't know the veracity of the statement, but add Tom Mars to the chorus of laughter pointed in our direction.
If a school has actual cause, and follow the terms of the contract for termination with cause, then there's no lawsuit.
If there isn't actual cause, or the school doesn't follow the appropriate terms, then they should lose 10 times out of 10.
What's going on at LSU is chicanery of the highest order, one way or the other. Woodward couldn't "reassign" Kelly without Kelly's approval, I wouldn't think.
Now, maybe Woodward approached Kelly about a "reassignment" and Kelly told him to kick bricks, at which point Woodward should have gone to the Board to discuss the next steps. If that's what happened, then Woodward's termination would be justified.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:15 am to ProjectP2294
Also LSU getting a settlement would technically be LSU "winning".
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:20 am to The Egg
quote:
yes jerking off on the phone with a spokesperson for sexual assault victims is apparently not good
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:21 am to aruss15
quote:
Tom Mars is an idiot. We can name multiple cases just in the last 10 years
Name one case where a coach was fired for cause for poor performance in the last 10 years. All of the cases being mentioned on here had something going on that was off the field and/or related to NCAA violations.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:23 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Woodward was given authority to reassign Brian Kelly inside the athletic department until they got could get all their ducks in a row for this whole ordeal. Woody decided to go rouge and fire BK, however because he did not have permission of the BoS to
terminate
How is that BK’s fault. If his boss fired him, he’s fired.
It’s done.
If Woody went rogue, that’s LSU’s problem not Kelly’s.
And if that is really what happened, I don’t blame BK at all for going scorched earth on LSU.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News