- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dellenger: SEC will comply with court orders, paving the way for signings
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:13 am to Fat Bastard
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:13 am to Fat Bastard
It is literally common sense.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:18 am to Fat Bastard
In my opinion the SEC still has claws, but the Louisiana judge has clipped them for now.
The current order specifically names the SEC and Sankey and blocks them from punishing LSU for playing these guys. If the SEC tries to enforce its penalties while that order is active, it risks contempt. The real fight comes at the preliminary injunction hearing Thursday and then on an emergency appeal.
LSU’s strongest argument is that these players entered the NFL because the NCAA told them their college eligibility was exhausted. The NCAA then created a five year eligibility model but excluded their specific class. When courts gave them another year, the SEC quickly created a new rule with massive penalties to stop schools from using them. That looks like the SEC trying to work around the court.
The SEC does still have some leverage. If LSU plays them under an injunction and that injunction is later reversed, the NCAA could try to use its Rule of Restitution to vacate wins. The SEC could also attempt its new penalties, but suspending Kiffin for half a season and taking 50% of LSU’s football budget after LSU followed a court order would trigger another major lawsuit.
My prediction: these particular players eventually receive a one year exception because this is a unique transition year mess. After that, the NCAA and conferences will adopt a firm rule preventing future NFL to college returns. LSU is protected right now, but until the appeals are finished, there is still some risk of wins being challenged later.
The current order specifically names the SEC and Sankey and blocks them from punishing LSU for playing these guys. If the SEC tries to enforce its penalties while that order is active, it risks contempt. The real fight comes at the preliminary injunction hearing Thursday and then on an emergency appeal.
LSU’s strongest argument is that these players entered the NFL because the NCAA told them their college eligibility was exhausted. The NCAA then created a five year eligibility model but excluded their specific class. When courts gave them another year, the SEC quickly created a new rule with massive penalties to stop schools from using them. That looks like the SEC trying to work around the court.
The SEC does still have some leverage. If LSU plays them under an injunction and that injunction is later reversed, the NCAA could try to use its Rule of Restitution to vacate wins. The SEC could also attempt its new penalties, but suspending Kiffin for half a season and taking 50% of LSU’s football budget after LSU followed a court order would trigger another major lawsuit.
My prediction: these particular players eventually receive a one year exception because this is a unique transition year mess. After that, the NCAA and conferences will adopt a firm rule preventing future NFL to college returns. LSU is protected right now, but until the appeals are finished, there is still some risk of wins being challenged later.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:30 am to JohnnyU
quote:
However if the conference wins an appeal they may be able to carry out the penalties.
There’s already language preventing any penalties.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:33 am to tiger81
quote:
We don't need to take that gamble with future penalties as a possibility
Pretty sure that the judge would reference previous losses where teams played players later found to be ineligible after a TRO was given as precedent that retroactive penalties could not be applied if the schools followed the restrictions once a TRO or injunction was overturned.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:38 am to TIGERhype
quote:
but suspending Kiffin for half a season and taking 50% of LSU’s football budget after LSU followed a court order would trigger another major lawsuit.
And it would cause an uproar in the SEC. Opposing fans love to talk **** and would cheer it on. Their respective university wouldn't think it was something to cheer. They would be horrified by it.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:39 am to TIGERhype
I think maybe that will be the case. My understanding is that the SEC is actively working to get into court. We may get granularity next week.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:42 am to Sponge
"There's a lot of parts of this I don't like. I don't think professionals should come back to college sports and college football. Do I believe NFL players should come back to college? No. However, I will operate at the highest level within the rules to give LSU the most competitive advantage as possible. As are many other major programs. When the rules and laws change, we will operate at the highest level at that time within the rules."
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:42 am to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible?
Just trying to scare schools into compliance.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:57 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:
You doubled down on dumbness instead of admitting you were wrong. Can't be taken serious.
You think SEC penalties are laws, so
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:00 pm to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible?
There can't be. As of the time they play, they are eligible. Even if they are declared ineligible later. There is precedent.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:02 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:It's the temporarily restrained part that concerns rational-thinking folks. It may not be worth worrying about; most of us here are not lawyers, I suspect, so it's hard not to be a little concerned.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:03 pm to Sponge
quote:
We’re talking about a #2 TE and a DT coming off injury
Uhh brotha I don’t think you realize how good Harris and Wright were last year at Ole Miss. Harris would be a huge get and boost the interior Dline big time. He was a problem against most teams Ole Miss faced. Ask Miami. Also ask last years LSU team when Harris tore LSU a new a-hole for most of the game.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:03 pm to JYD
quote:
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
If I hear this shite one more time I’m going to pull my hair out!!!
Let me give an update.
Those great attorneys, Led Zeppelin said: “Squeeze me baby, til the juice runs down my leg. The way you squeeze my lemon, makes me fall right out of bed.”
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:06 pm to mdomingue
Do the moral and right thing. The players are eligible per the court. They want LSU and we can use them.
SEC even acts ugly or disrespectful to LSU , threaten a winnable suit over disadvantage to LSU following the various courts orders.
Move on.
SEC even acts ugly or disrespectful to LSU , threaten a winnable suit over disadvantage to LSU following the various courts orders.
Move on.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:22 pm to The Pirate King
Knew he didn't have the balls to fight it. Play ball
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:28 pm to Pedropatterstine
My god, yet another one. YOU CANNOT RETROACTIVELY PUNISH ANYONE FOR FOLLOWING THE RUKES AT THE TIME. IF RUKES CHANGE, AND YOUBDONT ABIDE BY NEW RUKES, YOU CAN BE PUNISHED. IT IS THAT SIMPLE.
I was not trying to say that they would impose retroactive penalties. To clarify, if they win the appeal, they MAY be able to impose penalties going forward.
So, let’s say the SEC wins the appeal mid season, could they not then rule the players ineligible for the remainder of the season and impose fines if we don’t comply? Isn’t that what Dellinger reported: “This does not mean that penalties won’t eventually be enforced through other legal mechanisms, such as a suit in federal court, or if the SEC wins in trial.”
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:28 pm to Cs
Good, I guess. Let’s fricking play ball. I’m tired of all this legal shite.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:33 pm to mdomingue
quote:
One of our tRant lawyers should chime in to verify if this is correct, but
OT lawyer checking in:
Verifying
[Not Verifying]
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:36 pm to JohnnyU
quote:
I was not trying to say that they would impose retroactive penalties. To clarify, if they win the appeal, they MAY be able to impose penalties going forward. So, let’s say the SEC wins the appeal mid season, could they not then rule the players ineligible for the remainder of the season and impose fines if we don’t comply? Isn’t that what Dellinger reported: “This does not mean that penalties won’t eventually be enforced through other legal mechanisms, such as a suit in federal court, or if the SEC wins in trial.”
1) They won’t win because they’ve been wrong on the merits this whole time. Ole Miss is just being insane and Sankey won’t tell them to stfu
2) The part you’re quoting is just Sankey trying to save face.
He’s such an idiot for letting it get this far. The SEC is so flat out wrong on the merits that this has always been a waste of time. He’s getting some very bad advice.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 12:39 pm to Cs
Predictably, Sankey got bitch slapped. If he tries to enforce anything after the fact, he will be punked again. Let's Geauxxx!!!
Popular
Back to top


0





