- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dellenger: SEC will comply with court orders, paving the way for signings
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:34 am to Sponge
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:34 am to Sponge
Uh, both of those football players I believe were 2nd team All SEC. And you left out the basketball player...not included in this suit but the same situation. Luis was Big East Player of the Year and 2nd team All American. If you don't think he isn't a key guy for Will Wade, you need to talk to him. Also, it is the principle of the thing...it is time to put the NCAA, the SEC, etc in their place. They discriminated against the class of 2022 by not making that 5 and 5 policy retroactive for them.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:41 am to Veritas
We have a winner. Abide by the law, if the law changes, follow that law, and stand up for your institution.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:44 am to NotaStarGazer
the SEC cannot do shite to a judge here who has federal precedents backing him. SCOTUS ruling and the colorado ruling.
what's skankey gonna do? violate and be in contempt of the TRO?
he has played bully ball for long enough screwing many over.
i will not say what else SHOULD happen. but i know exactly what could make his arse resign within 48 hours.
what's skankey gonna do? violate and be in contempt of the TRO?
he has played bully ball for long enough screwing many over.
i will not say what else SHOULD happen. but i know exactly what could make his arse resign within 48 hours.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:51 am to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible
exactly!!!
the SEC would loose badly in that case
Let it go, this should be a one and done situation
I don't see it happening in the future, UNLESS the NCAA changes thier own rules yet again
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:52 am to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible?
Exactly why it's beyond moronic.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:53 am to Fat Bastard
You are I are probably a bit biased in favor of LSU and the SEC in competitions...best conference, etc But I have never liked Sankey. He puffs out his chest on everything...not just this. He keeps bragging about the SEC being the best football conference despite the Big 10 having won the last 3 NC. He also tries to basically tell the CFP how many SEC teams they should take before the season is even played. Being biased is one thing...shouting at windmills and being an embarrassment is something else. I wish he would be removed as head of the SEC.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:54 am to oldskule
"Negativity for Lane & LSU." Curious, why are Texas Aggies, Uk, Mizzo, Tenn. not mentioned anywhere / at all when they all have former professionals on their rosters. A total 0f 91 across the country..?? Why are former pro players, in basketball particularly, eligible to sign & play with NCAA schools & American players are not?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:58 am to jcaz
quote:
How can penalties be retroactive if they were legal at the time? Makes no sense
Obviously they can't. There are many instances where PAST games have been forfeited due to ineligible players....Vidal Alexander everyone probably remembers. But UNDER the rules AT THE TIME he was playing, he WAS ineligible. It just hadn't been uncovered yet. But unless there is fraud involved, you can't change the rules in the middle of the game.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:58 am to mdomingue
You doubled down on dumbness instead of admitting you were wrong. Can't be taken serious.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:59 am to Sponge
Lmao.....now I'm understanding why some of you vote blue.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 10:59 am to Cs
All bend the knee to kiffin and Landry. Well done boys!
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:00 am to Keltic Tiger
Where was Sanky and his morals when Chambliss got a 6th year for some BS medical reason from a Mississippi judge?
In fact that ruling just showed how the NCAA has no teeth and lead to stuff like this.
At least in this case there is some sort of arguement. None of these kids (I assume almost none) would hae gone to the NFL. They were borderline even getting. drafted, so if they had the choice they would have come back for a 5th year.
In fact that ruling just showed how the NCAA has no teeth and lead to stuff like this.
At least in this case there is some sort of arguement. None of these kids (I assume almost none) would hae gone to the NFL. They were borderline even getting. drafted, so if they had the choice they would have come back for a 5th year.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 11:02 am
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:01 am to NotaStarGazer
quote:
But I have never liked Sankey.
he is nothing more than a yankee carpetbagger grifter. he was under the wing of slimey slive for years.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 11:37 am
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:02 am to Cs
What do you expect Stankey to say?
"No, we are gonna violate a court order."
They are confident the TRO doesn't become a full blown injunction on Thursday
Otherwise they are gonna fight this in federal court.
Nothing ab this report from Delly reads "this thing is over" to me
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:02 am to BreauxBridgeLSU
quote:
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible?
The SEC is not saying that the "players are eligible". They are saying they will comply with the court order. However if the conference wins an appeal they may be able to carry out the penalties.
I guess that's a risk Kiffin, Verge, Rousse are willing to take?
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:05 am to JohnnyU
My god, yet another one. YOU CANNOT RETROACTIVELY PUNISH ANYONE FOR FOLLOWING THE RUKES AT THE TIME. IF RUKES CHANGE, AND YOUBDONT ABIDE BY NEW RUKES, YOU CAN BE PUNISHED. IT IS THAT SIMPLE.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:06 am to BilJ
quote:
Yeah you’d lose that suit quickly trying to retro actively enforce penalties
It doesn't have to be proactive. I would say the players are ineligible from that point forward and could apply penalties if the teams don't comply.
It's possible that the conferences accepts it all and washes it's hands of a one year exception for the 2022 players impacted by the stupid way 5 for 5 was handled.
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:07 am to The Pirate King
quote:
This does not mean that penalties won’t eventually be enforced through other legal mechanisms, such as a suit in federal court, or if the SEC wins in trial.
This makes zero sense. Sankey/the SEC are saying they will comply with this current court order allowing players to be eligible to play in the SEC. Schools will obviously comply as well. Does this mean the SEC would punish themselves too for complying and allowing these players to play on their teams right now if they later have the ruling overturned in Federal court??
If the Federal Court overturns the case, then teams would likely comply with that official ruling and not play any of these players. So what would there be to penalize at that point??
Posted on 8/29/26 at 11:08 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:
My god, yet another one. YOU CANNOT RETROACTIVELY PUNISH ANYONE FOR FOLLOWING THE RUKES AT THE TIME. IF RUKES CHANGE, AND YOUBDONT ABIDE BY NEW RUKES, YOU CAN BE PUNISHED. IT IS THAT SIMPLE.
rantards here will never get it. they just repeat what some other bozo told them and repeat as gospel. never fails.
here are some old examples :
" urban meyers gimmick offense will never work in the SEC"
" all that motion crap from meyer, malzahn, canada, etc is useless"
" all saban can do is recruit"
etc
etc
Popular
Back to top


1






