Started By
Message

Dellenger: SEC will comply with court orders, paving the way for signings

Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:26 am
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10682 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:26 am
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163160 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:32 am to
Predictable but maybe they feel like they had to make a stand for appearance sake
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
681 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:33 am to
Holy shite
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
15644 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:33 am to
Bend the knee Sankey.

No conference is bigger than LSU.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69825 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:34 am to
Sankey's mouthpiece now backtracking a step and saying that they're only complying with this order as it currently stands today.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 8/29/26 at 9:55 am
Posted by BreauxBridgeLSU
Member since Jun 2019
799 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:36 am to
Help me understand how can there be penalties later if they just said the players are eligible?
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
14994 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:37 am to
Now Sankey is setting the stage for a future legal fight against member schools who will have to defend themselves. Beyond dumb. Don’t think the Big 10 won’t consider coming in to sweep up schools the SEC litigates against.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
26033 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:38 am to
All this negativity for LSU and Kiffin, and all unnecessary!

Kiffin is doing his job to constantly make his roster better....period!
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163160 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:43 am to
Yeah you’d lose that suit quickly trying to retro actively enforce penalties
Posted by tiger81
Brentwood, TN.
Member since Jan 2008
21312 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:44 am to
We don't need to take that gamble with future penalties as a possibility. The juice isn't worth the squeeze. We'd be crazy to possibly face those penalties. Let's play ball.....
Posted by LVag1997
Member since Jun 2021
1119 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:45 am to
I predicted the SEC would make the threat. But no timetable to adjudicate it by the SEC. Classic poor leadership.
Posted by G&P
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2013
2467 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:47 am to
Smart.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19392 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Predictable but maybe they feel like they had to make a stand for appearance sake


I’m not convinced the SEC gives a shite
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
305 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:49 am to
Scare tactic...probably democrats....lol...i kid
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
25329 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:50 am to
Sankey got pantsed, all that screaming and he bends the knee. He should be ousted for making the sec look retarded
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
305 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:51 am to
And here is one falling for scare tactics...lol. you csnt change the damn rules AFTER the fact and hold someone accountable and penalize them for following the rules. No court will take that case.....even boasberg
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
4068 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:51 am to
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48898 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Sankey's mouthpiece now backtracking a step and saying that they're only complying for now


I don't think he is saying anything untrue unless the language of the ruling expressly prohibits it.

The judge could amend his ruling or even make it part of the ruling if the preliminary injunction is overturned, to prohibit future penalties for the time when the preliminary injunctions were in place, but what he is saying does appear to be a possibility.

This was something that was discussed well before now on this board.

I do not expect the SEC to do anything to LSU, and if they try, I expect LSU to fight it. It's a lot to deal with, though, and is part of the reason I wonder if walking away is the right call. This, like everything in life, is a risk-reward calculation. The whole juice/squeeze situation.

Whatever the Tigers decide, I'm all for it.
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
305 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:53 am to
There is no fight, legally speaking. You can't penalize someone for following the rules in place....after the fact
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
26033 posts
Posted on 8/29/26 at 9:54 am to
Cant wait to see the massive melt......
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram