re: Are we committed to a dual threat QB instead of the best player?

Solo Daniels was good Saturday night. Without him we don’t come close to tying it up. What more did you want from him. Statistically, he was the best qb in College Football in week 1

Burrow is the ceiling and nobody will touch that ceiling. Generational talent….we have to stop comparing qb’s to Burrow. Daniels was good Saturday night.

Do some of y'all REALLY think these coaches getting paid millions and millions of dollars, with all the pressure in the world on them in their first game, would purposely play a QB that didn't give them the best chance to win?

Simply because they're "committed to" a certain style? Think about that shite for a minute.

You're a fan sitting there with your fat arse on the couch, meanwhile your coach is the winningest active coach in college football and has been employed at this job for 30 years.

And you think he's doing the opposite of everything he can to win the game, simply because he's stubborn and wants to stick to some style, because Joe Blow fan on his couch thinks he knows better

There is a team out there with a great OL that can pass block and run block with good RBs that Nuss may very well be the better QB. But this team ain’t it. And I love Nuss. But we’d have gotten blown out had he played most of the game Sunday.

He would have gotten sacked several times when Daniels eluded pressure. He wouldn’t have had 125+ yards rushing that Daniels had (whatever it was minus the sack yardage), and he likely would have thrown 2 or 3 really bad picks. His big arm and confidence in it is what we love about him, but would have been a huge disadvantage Sunday night with all those guys in his face all night.

His time will come—and it likely will at some point this year as Daniels is almost inevitably gonna get banged up at some point this year—let’s hope it’s far enough in the future that our OL has found the right 5 and started to gel and Emery is back and significantly better than the 3 now(who are not good). But the team as it stands right now is not set up for Nuss to have success.

But finally, frick you and your ilk. We can have 2 good QBs and like them both. You don’t have to choose your favorite and shite talk the other one—who actually played a really nice game. It not only makes you an idiot, it makes you an a-hole.

quote:

---

Are we committed to a dual threat QB instead of the best player?

---

What gives you the impression Nuss is the better of the 2 QB’s to put us in the best position to win? You know more than BK, Sloane, and Denbrock? BK ain’t Lester -

C’mon guys, y’all are better than this

No, a poorly coached team did. 2 muffed punts, 2 missed assignments on kick protection, horrible offensive game plan. That cost us the game.

Daniele is far from the problem

So you spent all summer evaluating who should run the offense? What in the world makes you think Nuss would come out and dominate and don’t you think if he was as great as you say, he would have beat out Daniel’s in the off-season?

quote:

---

Denbrock isn’t the answer.

---

thanks for proving you know NOTHING about football concepts and never watched any denbrock film.DO you know how much of the Offense JD has grasped? how much of the playbook has denbrock gotten installed? canada only had 20% for the BYU opener. you can have the best plays and concepts in the land denbrock cannot execute for them. he will review and adjust and add more to the playbook as we move on.