RazorBroncs

Wow. Thought this announcement was coming soon for Mitch McConnell, did not expect this.

Anybody know what happens next as far as his seat in Congress? Does the governor appoint someone or is there a vote?

quote:

---

Instead, there are a lot of people like yourself who seem determined to wrangle me into presenting a theory for what I think happened and I simply am not prepared to do so. I would think a professional LEO would understand this shite.

---

Because YOU started the thread, Ed, so clearly you think it's significant and have some idea in your head as to why. You understand that, right?

It's not hard to understand why you'd have posters asking you why you think this is an important development when you're the one who obviously thought it was important enough to start a thread about.

"I'm just looking for discussion"

You're not. The people that point out that this makes no sense as a coverup are just brushed off and called names. The people that "question your questioning" are just brushed off as sheep and FEDS. Clearly you have some idea in your head, and anybody that doesn't figure out what Ole Ed is getting at is just not that intelligent even though Ole Ed himself can't even articulate what he's getting at.

quote:

---

But what would be the possible reasons for them to dig up the grass and pave the area for a coverup?

I don't know. But as a LEO yourself, you might be able to answer that for us

---

You started the thread, not me. I already gave you the reason they'd not want blood soaked grass in the middle of their public college campus earlier in the thread.

quote:

---

Put on your investigator hat for a second and try this thought experiment. If you had reason to believe that someone other than Robinson killed Kirk, or that more than one person may have been involved

---

I've had my "investigator hat" on since the moment this happened. I've seen the facts and considered the other viewpoints. I question a lot, but this is one of the most straightforward investigations you'll ever see. Why couldn't he have acted alone? He didn't do anything extraordinary or particularly hard. You're acting like he outpaced and outsmarted Secret Service at the White House or something. He climbed a ladder to a roof and pulled a trigger at a wide open target.

Not quite superhuman.

The problem you have is that you're STARTING from the assumption that he couldn't have acted alone or that Robinson didn't shoot him, then trying to make the pieces fit into that assumption. You're having to bend and contort and bring small things like landscaping into your puzzle, and even then it still doesn't fit.

You'd be a terrible detective or LEO.

The facts of the case are clearly laid out, and they paint a very obvious picture to anyone that isn't starting from a place of bias.

quote:

---

That seems kind of ridiculous.

---

I'm not trying to be combative with you and really haven't been trying to this whole time. I just want you to answer or drill down on what you think this paving incident means and why it's noteworthy

I get it, you think Robinson was MK Ultraed. But what would be the possible reasons for them to dig up the grass and pave the area for a coverup? You can't seem to answer and just deflect by saying "I'm not suggesting anything" or "I found it interesting, I'm just asking questions" or "it's not my job to read for you" or "I haven't paid much attention to this conspiracy theory" (which is a lie, you've made multiple threads about it the last few days and were posting about it as far back as April)

You have yet to actually say what you think this means, that's why you're catching so much shite. You posted it like it has some huge implications, and have yet to actually say what those implications are in your view.

It makes you look like a loon that can't defend his stance when you can't answer a simple question without mudslinging, calling people sheep and FEDS (still pretending like you don't know what a US Marshal does just makes you look unintelligent, not me), and acting like everyone else just isn't smart enough or on the leading edge of "questioning everything" enough to understand.

So tell us what it all means, Mr. Gatekeeper of Questioning™

The entire thread was about the jew conspiracy theory, literally everyone in the thread "brought it up" because that's what was being discussed. Stop being dishonest when everyone can see it for themselves in that very thread. You're right in the thick of it, calling everyone "sheep" and other perjoratives if they questioned or doubted the theory. It's all right there

quote:

---

And you continue to play dumb as if everyone hasn't seen the numerous conspiracy theorists claiming Mossad had Charlie killed. That is THE conspiracy theory involved here, I haven't seen any others even floated out there. But you know this, you're just playing dumb for whatever reason.



Really? As I said in the OP I haven't followed it much

---

quote:

---

Oh, so the frickin FED who just outright lied about me and said I was blaming Jews (even though I've done no such thing)

---

quote:

---

If you don't see the above as lies and slander then please find for me where I have alleged some grand Jewish conspiracy. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You're the only one in here talking about Jews.

---

LINK

Here's a 7 page thread from April that you participated in heavily, check your posts starting on page 3.

"But I hadn't heard this Mossad conspiracy theory before"

You actively participated in propagating that very theory in April.
You lied several times in this thread saying you had never heard of it before and it doesn't exist. Your own posting history disproves that.

quote:

---

You can go frick yourself, by the way.

It's amazing how you can go from being cool to throwing obvious frickin lies and slander out at the drop of a hat because you don't like a single thread. You post like a frickin psycho.

---

You don't even see the irony do you? :lol:

I don't attack you personally Ed, never have and never will.

You know who else feels "personally attacked" when their ideals are challenged with words? The type of guy that murdered Charlie Kirk and think words are violence if they don't agree with them.

quote:

---

I would ask where you're coming up with these obvious lies, but it isn't even in question that you're a glowie. A Jewish glowie at that.

You're the first one to bring the Jews into this, chief.

---

Well Ed, what are you implying is the cover up here? We all know what the conspiracy theory is, don't pretend like you don't.

Go ahead and spell out what you think this "digging up of grass and paving the area" means. And don't give us your usual "I'm just asking questions and find it interesting" bullshite. Nobody believes that.

quote:

---

dirt daubers this summer.


A spiders worst nightmare.

Definitely a damn nature you scary type of death.

---

They murder and eat other wasps in the same ripping-their-heads-off fashion too. I try to leave daubers and paper wasps alone if I run into them around the house. Both are excellent hunters of things you don't want around and both aren't aggressive towards humans if you just leave their nests alone.

Yellowjackets and red wasps can get fricked and go extinct for all I care.

quote:

---

Just wondering what excuse do you have for this malfunction
an excuse that will work in all 57 states

---

Especially one that resonates with the World War 11 veterans

The amount of times "clear the vagina" has been used in this thread like it's the crossbar in a baby pole vault :lol:

quote:

---

Dude was dedicated to his craft, what a better way to teach someone

---

Everyone here assuming suicide. Have we considered that maybe he was so good at flying he thought he could do it without the plane?