- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
MikeTheTiger71
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4261 |
| Registered on: | 12/8/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: List of Potential QB Transfers
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/8/25 at 11:45 pm to TeamLSU
quote:
Chambliss was injured his Freshmen season, therefore he will be seeking a Medical Redshirt for that first season.
Are you saying that he was injured in 2021 when he didn’t play at all or in 2022 when he played only 2 games? In general I don’t believe you can go back and retroactively claim a medical redshirt in your first redshirt eligible season, then use a normal redshirt in a subsequent season. A medical redshirt is to give another season to a player who had already used a redshirt prior to the year he was injured.
re: Why not Let Coach Kiffin call the offensive pays against Houston...
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/7/25 at 11:04 pm to Shaq4prez
quote:
Well for 1, he doesn't know our playbook and our players don't know his. That should be common sense
It doesn’t seem like the players know the current playbook either. They might as well take the two weeks to start learning the new playbook. It can’t be any worse than what we saw the last 2 games.
re: The Bowl Games are crumbling….i give it 5 years.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/7/25 at 11:00 pm to Safety Blitz
The bowl games need to start paying the players NIL directly rather than the full payout going to the teams and conferences perhaps with additional NIL opportunities going to the winning team.
re: #1 Ranked Recruiter
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/7/25 at 1:20 am to Tifway419
quote:
The only way I see it happening (if Kevin Smith is hired, of course) is if Eric Wolford is an analyst and LSU goes without an O-Line assistant. I haven’t heard what his role would be, but we still would need an O-Line assistant. Going without one is not happening.
The only thing calling him an analyst would mean is that he wouldn’t be able to recruit off campus. He’s an older guy and may be perfectly content to just coach and not worry about recruiting.
re: Why low number of recruits?
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 2:44 pm to NewportTiger
quote:
It's not like we had 25 commitments, then BK fired and we went down to 14. Not sure we lost any due to BK firing.
It’s not so much that they lost recruits. It’s that there was no coaching staff in place making a push for new commitments over the last couple of months.
re: List of Potential QB Transfers
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 1:33 pm to mdomingue
quote:
He was already a redshirt freshman when he played 2 games in 2022. He played 0 games in his first year. I made the same mistake. He is listed on the Ferris State roster in 2021, but with no number.
Ah, that’s what I get for trusting Wikipedia and media reports. In that case, I don’t see how he has any grounds for an additional year unless the reason he played only 2 games in 2022 was an injury.
re: List of Potential QB Transfers
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 11:41 am to DCtiger1
quote:
How quickly will Chambliss get an answer on his appeal?
His appeal seems like a no-brainer. He would have received a redshirt his freshman year under DI rules and under current DII rules as well.
re: What now for Tulane?
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 11:36 am to Flavius Belisarius
Huff and Napier are off the table now. They should have moved on when Baker didn’t sign on immediately.
re: I can’t recall a new HC putting a staff together this quickly.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 11:32 am to doubleb
The OL coach hire seemed a bit odd and rushed. I wish he’d taken a little more time on that one. It didn’t seem to help with signing day. Other than that, he’s done a great job convincing most of his offensive staff to come with him and holding onto Baker and his staff.
re: Memphis hires Charles Huff - Dellenger
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/6/25 at 10:16 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Memphis and Tulane are both better than multiple P4 jobs.
The AAC has really closed the gap with the ACC the last couple of years. With FSU currently spinning their wheels, the top of the AAC is just as good as the top teams in the ACC except Miami.
re: Feels like 5 for 5
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 2:58 pm to TigerReich
quote:
Filling an OLine via portal feels like a heavy lift for whatever reason. Maybe it's because the cadence and timing, working together and such, is so important and plugging folks in a line seems difficult. Maybe i'm wrong, that's the perception.
The problem with the LSU OL this year wasn’t the portal guys, it was the returning players not developing (except for Adams before he got hurt).
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 12:57 pm to Scoob
quote:
I'm comfortable that LSU will get somebody else good, if he leaves.
I am hopeful that would be the case, but Kiffin doesn’t exactly have a strong track record of hiring strong DCs. Part of the allure of hiring Kiffin was that the defense was in good shape and LSU needed an HC to handle the offensive side. Now we have to worry if we’re back to a great offense with questionable defense. I’d much rather stick with a combo of Kiffin and Baker than the uncertainty of who Kiffin would bring in instead.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 12:53 pm to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
Arkansas is 2-10 because they are not a good team. Find ways to lose.
Here’s the problem with your take. Playing well defensively against Arkansas didn’t matter because they were 2-10, but then playing well defensively against 10-2 Alabama and 10-2 Oklahoma didn’t matter because their offenses weren’t strong. You have to pick a lane here. Either you judge the performance based on the overall strength of the opponent or you judge based on the strength of opponent’s offense.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 12:43 pm to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
I leave out Arkansas because they have won 2 games all year and are winless in conference. I don't know if that would necessarily be the feather in Baker's cap when talking about opposing offenses they have stopped.
Arkansas only won 2 games because their defense was awful, not because their offense was bad. It absolutely was a credit to the defense to hold down a high scoring offense to escape with a one point win due to LSU’s anemic offense.
quote:
UGA is a very good team. Oklahoma is not a good team. They have a good defense but Mateer and their offense is going to hinder any chance they have in the playoffs
Again, the strength of Oklahoma’s offense (or lack thereof) has absolutely nothing to do with an evaluation of their defense. OM put up 34 points on their Top 10 defense and 35 on Georgia’s Top 15 defense. How OM’s defense fared against OU’s offense isn’t relevant to this discussion.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 11:56 am to Scoob
quote:
We could not contain a mobile QB
Taylen Green broke free on one long TD run but was otherwise contained and passed for only 165 yards. They held Arkansas to only 22 points (15 excluding the blocked point). Lenoris Sellers rushed for 19 yards and had 143 yards on the way to 10 points.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 11:33 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
Outside of the first two drives of the game, I saw them march down the field at will pretty much even with the fumble right before he goes into the end zone.
Oklahoma forced Tennessee to punt only twice. Tennessee drove inside the Oklahoma 30 on their first 4 drives and to their 36 on the fifth. Drive 6 was an INT. 3 of 6 drives in the second half got inside the 30 and 4 of 6 inside the 40. That’s 7 drives inside the 30 and 9 inside the 40 out of 12. If you were consistently judging the two defensive performances, you would draw similar conclusions.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 11:20 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
You do realize that Ole Miss played us, Florida, Kentucky, Arkansas, Miss. State, South Carolina in conference and that they are a combined 9-39 in SEC games, right?
It’s funny that you want to only judge LSU’s defense against the top 3 offenses they faced (although you conveniently write off Arkansas’ offense because it doesn’t support your argument), but ignore the fact that Ole Miss scored 34 and 35 against the two best defenses they faced (Oklahoma and Georgia).
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 10:36 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
I don't know if you watched that game but OU had a sack fumble for a TD, two INTs that led to FGs right before the half, and they were just playing the prevent defense at the end of the game when they were up by 9 with less than 2:00 left at 33-24. Their defense won that game for them.
I don’t know if you watched the LSU-Ole Miss game where the defense caused a fumble and had an interception to end promising OM drives and held firm to force a FG in the red zone on another. The defense kept them in the game despite a horrendous showing by the offense. See? You can come up with a positive narrative for the defense’s performance if you don’t start out from the biased perspective that they didn’t play well.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 10:31 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
Plenty of teams outside the conference that are better.
Sure, let’s see your list of those teams along with the same level of scrutiny of the strength of the opponents they played. The Big 10 with their 5-7 non-conference record against P4 must be full of teams better than the SEC. Maybe the Big 12 is better with its 0-3 record against the SEC including losses to Miss St and Auburn with their combined 2-14 SEC record. Or maybe the ACC where the 5 teams tied for second had 8 non-conference losses.
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 10:16 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
Oklahoma played awesome against Tennessee and their defense was the only reason they were in the game.
Oklahoma gave up 27 points and 456 yards to Tennessee and that was awesome, but LSU giving up 24 points and 480 yards to Ole Miss was terrible?
re: I'm fine if Baker leaves.
Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 12/5/25 at 10:07 am to josh336
quote:
Ole miss averaged 461 a game. Got 480 vs LSU, lsu was 6th best of 8 teams vs ole miss.
Now do points allowed. This defense was amongst the best in the country in creating turnovers and preventing red zone scores. It wasn’t a one-off that they forced Ole Miss into idle drives.
Vandy and A&M were poor performances without Weeks in both games and without Gooden against Vandy. I don’t think you can use A&M as a gauge for any facet of this LSU team other than losing heart in the face of all the negativity surrounding the program.
Popular
0












