- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Quick, healthy snack ideas that aren’t nuts, raw veggies, or fruit?
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:51 pm to Big Scrub TX
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:51 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Virtually all meats. Most fish. Eggs. Most nuts. Avocadoes. Broccoli. Full fat cheese. Cream. Butter. A variety of oils and fats - tallow, suet, lard, avocado, coconut, ghee, macadamia.
I would put red meat basically at the top of the pile of "health foods".
Your answer was more so what I was expecting. While I focus on eating "healthy" foods I realized years ago that what I think is healthy and what you think is healthy differ. It's more so balancing all of our proteins, fats, and carbs to fit a lifestyle we can maintain daily.
If I eat a bowl of oatmeal with fresh fruit and end up with the exact same macro and micro nutrients that you get at the end of the day not one of us is "more healthy" than the other.
I hardly eat oatmeal anymore but my point is balance, if people get so worked up about specific food groups then they develop eating disorders.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 2/15/18 at 3:15 pm to Adam4848
quote:
I hardly eat oatmeal anymore but my point is balance, if people get so worked up about specific food groups then they develop eating disorders.
i agree with the "not getting worked up" principle. Steady research with an open mind and trying to avoid confirmation bias keeps me from getting worked up and rather just adjusting based on the weight of scientific outcomes, my own metrics (blood work, waistline, etc) and how I feel/perform.
and, after experimenting with everything from raw, vegan and vegetarian, to "Fu*-it," to a "balanced diet" (whatever that means) and calorie counting, I've settled into a way of eating that is very natural for me and easy to maintain. It has my lipid profile in better shape than ever (1:1 trig to HDL for e.g.), keeps me in a very narrow and healthy weight range and BF%, no crazy insulin spikes, no physical cravings (besides alcohol...), much lower caloric intake (even though I don't count anything any more), and I feel better than ever, approaching mid-40s.
I consider the veggies I eat to be more a Pascal's Wager than anything (oh and i love them), and I follow a lot of micronutrient research and theories. I do eat a lot of veggies, broccoli sprouts, berries, good seeds and nuts, avocados (and their oil), olive oil, coconut oil, very dark chocolate/cacao nibs, coffee, tea, herbs, and other plant products. We make a lot of really good carb-substitutes that keep me happy. But I'm very well convinced that as a rule, humans are primarily fatty meat and fish eaters for optimal survival.
But that doesn't stress me out, at all. I just eat, shite and live.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 2/15/18 at 3:34 pm to McLemore
quote:
But that doesn't stress me out, at all. I just eat, shite and live.
Agreed
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:35 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Vitamin C appears strong enough to overcome phytic acid. In one study, adding 50 mg of vitamin C counteracted the phytic acid load of a meal. In another study, 80 mg of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) counteracted 25 mg of phytic acid.
Counteract yes, neutralize - no
quote:
They are both how you prepare food.
Still very different. Soaking washes softens, or dilutes, Cooking denatures, kills bacteria and parasites, and well as converts complex carbs to simple carbs.
I appreciate the source you provided, Good info. I'm more or less disagreeing with the terminology you used and the comparison.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:10 pm to Adam4848
quote:If you eat oatmeal with fresh fruit daily, you almost by definition are unlikely to end up with the same macros as me. That means it is certainly possible that one of us is "more healthy" than the other.
If I eat a bowl of oatmeal with fresh fruit and end up with the exact same macro and micro nutrients that you get at the end of the day not one of us is "more healthy" than the other.
quote:
I hardly eat oatmeal anymore but my point is balance, if people get so worked up about specific food groups then they develop eating disorders.
This is sort of facile. I agree that the Olympic athletes that have been in the news eating only toast have an eating disorder. I do not agree that a "balanced diet" necessarily makes sense. And the macro nutrient categories are all very large with many constituents. Simply opting for only 2 out of the 3 macro categories should not cause anyone to predict an eating disorder to arise. What you call "worked up", I call "understanding what I'm actually eating" - and thus I avoid certain things. It's the opposite of a disorder. I gorge myself daily on things I like that are great for me.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:36 am to McLemore
quote:I honestly don't remember, my blood work was last year. Everything was considered very good then, nothing else was needed at that point.
curious, what is your triglycerides to HDL ratio?
The rest of your post I agree with
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:39 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I hope so...but how are you measuring this? How young are you? If you keep up 400g of carbs per day in perpetuity, you very well might end up being a thin person who is very unhealthy.
My bloodwork last year came back good.
I am 31, I lift 5 days a week and run 3-4 days a week. My RHR sits in the 30s most days. I don't eat candy and the crap carbs the general population do. I am selective to keeping my carb sources natural.
I already know this doesn't agree with your theory but it is what works for me. Has also worked for other people I have done diet plans for. To each their own.
ETA: I am not saying I am opposed to a diet that has a good bit of fats included. I just choose my fat sources differently than you and most Keto guys
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 10:41 am
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:07 pm to thibtigerfan
quote:
I just choose my fat sources differently than you and most Keto guys
can you elaborate on this? what are the sources? what are you trying to avoid? why?
my main goal is to get as close as possible to a 1:1 Omega 6:3 ratio. Under the SAD, most people are closer to a 20:1 Omega 6:3 ratio! A very dangerous inflammatory state--high CVD risk.
Are you concerned with saturated fat? If so, then why? The latest science is suggesting that some people need to watch (not eliminate) saturated fat, but avoiding it altogether has been shown to actually increase CVD (including stroke) risk.
What is your triglycerides to HDL ratio? This ratio and--if your LDL is "high"-- an LDL-P (particle size) test help determine whether saturated fat is a potential issue for you.
There are also a lot of developments going on with the APOE genes (1-4), which may determine whether a high-saturated fat diet is good, bad etc. for you. People with APOE4 are supposedly at greater risk re: saturated fat and need to lean more toward monounsaturated and omega 3-right PUFAs.
Summary re: saturated fat and LDL and CVD: LINK
quote:
The health authorities have been telling us for decades that saturated fat raises the risk of heart disease.
For this reason, we've been told to avoid foods like meat, eggs, coconuts and dairy products.
The theory goes like this:
Saturated fat raises LDL cholesterol in the blood.
LDL cholesterol lodges in the arteries, causing atherosclerosis and eventually, heart disease.
This is also known as the diet-heart hypothesis.
This theory has never been proven, despite it having been the cornerstone of dietary recommendations since 1977 (1).
The problem with so many existing fat studies (especially epidemiological studies) is they don't control for sugar. Totally insane.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:13 pm to Big Scrub TX
Yet you think a cold cut is good for you
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:16 pm to REG861
quote:
Yet you think a cold cut is good for you
what specifically about a "cold cut" is bad for you?
i agree that if you add a bunch of chemicals and sugar (which many do) that that is bad for you. But what else? Why?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:19 pm to McLemore
quote:
i agree that if you add a bunch of chemicals and sugar (which many do) that that is bad for you.
That.
Obviously good Turkey is optimal. I’ll try and avoid processed meats as much as possible, so i distrust cold cuts outside of turkey and ham. But I’m sure the resident nutrition expert will be here soon to tell us that Oscar Mayer bologna is better for you than kale.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:37 pm to REG861
Hormel Natural Choice is actually free of crap. Their salami, pepperoni, bacon, hot dogs, and smoked ham are all good.
For most people sodium isn't a big deal--at least not the way we've been told. Also, i know i sweat out sodium like a mofo (people differ in this regard), and all of my blood test come back with low side of normal sodium results, despite my high-sodium diet--and my BP is normal. so i don't care about sodium content (in fact i am always looking for ways to increase my intake without drinking salt water).
eta: Oscar Mayer actually has added-nitrate/ite free dogs (I'm sure it's shitty lips and assholes, and I don't buy these regularly at all). Applegate has good ones too.
For most people sodium isn't a big deal--at least not the way we've been told. Also, i know i sweat out sodium like a mofo (people differ in this regard), and all of my blood test come back with low side of normal sodium results, despite my high-sodium diet--and my BP is normal. so i don't care about sodium content (in fact i am always looking for ways to increase my intake without drinking salt water).
eta: Oscar Mayer actually has added-nitrate/ite free dogs (I'm sure it's shitty lips and assholes, and I don't buy these regularly at all). Applegate has good ones too.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:41 pm to McLemore
quote:
can you elaborate on this? what are the sources? what are you trying to avoid? why?
My fat sources come mostly from fish (salmon mostly), almond butter, peanut butter, avocados, MCT Oil, eggs, and some walnuts (every now and then)
I am not opposed to eating a steak, I just don't cook that every day (1 a week or every 2 weeks maybe)
I do not eat dairy at all.
The reasoning is that when I eat this way I can visibly see (through data) and also physically feel that my run times/HR/ RHR are in much better places.
It is what works for my body
Posted on 2/16/18 at 1:58 pm to REG861
quote:
I’m sure the resident nutrition expert will be here soon to tell us that Oscar Mayer bologna is better for you than kale.
Kale probably won’t get a rise. Now if you had gotten really got ballsy and had the nerve to compare the bologna to a starch like a potato or a Lima bean, you’d get an eyeful to read. That said, I’m oddly fascinated by his unwaveringly brazen cocksuredness. I love these threads.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 2:36 pm to thibtigerfan
Sounds pretty good to me.
I have pretty much memorized the Omega 6:3 ratio of foods that are high in PUFA. CHART
The problem with peanuts is they have ZERO Omega 3s (basically--it's barely a trace amt)--so the PUFA in peanuts is all Omega 6. You need Omega 6, but as I mentioned, we get so much of it from the prevalent shitty oils restaurants and food mfg use that it's totally out of whack with Omega 3 intake.
The good news about the fat in peanuts is it has a plurality of monounsaturated fat. this is the profile: Saturated=1:PUFA=2.3:MUFA=3.6. But it's still a lot of unattenuated Omega 6.
Almonds have a similar 6:3 ratio as peanuts, but are better because their fat profile is Sat=0.34:PUFA=1.1:MUFA=2.8
Walnuts have a better 6:3 ratio BUT are predominantly PUFA with little saturated and even less MUFA.
Also, the problem with getting omega 3s from seeds and nuts is, humans are very inefficient at converting ALA to EPA and DHA. So, the salmon source is key (I take krill oil capsules too).
Beef isn't a significant PUFA source, so I don't really concern myself with its fat content re: Omega 3 (although grass-fed is better in this regard--but again, beef is about half saturated and half MUFA--very little PUFA).
I stick to cage-free, organic- omega 3 enriched eggs--i haven't broken down the Omega 3 and 6 stuff as well for eggs--it's sort of all over the place, but eggs do have significant PUFA (but more saturated and even more MUFA).
I limit dairy too, but mainly due to the quality available and the lactose (sugar). I do eat grass-fed butter and full-fat yogurt some. If i had a cow, i'd be more inclined to branch out.
my RHR is mostly affected by my exercise level these days. when i'm training it is usually below 50. My HR zones remain steady during training. I try to fuel my activity (primarily skiing, running, swimming, and biking) with fat as primary, but as i noted in another post, i experiment with super starch and some complex carbs for races and all-day outings. And beer.
I have pretty much memorized the Omega 6:3 ratio of foods that are high in PUFA. CHART
The problem with peanuts is they have ZERO Omega 3s (basically--it's barely a trace amt)--so the PUFA in peanuts is all Omega 6. You need Omega 6, but as I mentioned, we get so much of it from the prevalent shitty oils restaurants and food mfg use that it's totally out of whack with Omega 3 intake.
The good news about the fat in peanuts is it has a plurality of monounsaturated fat. this is the profile: Saturated=1:PUFA=2.3:MUFA=3.6. But it's still a lot of unattenuated Omega 6.
Almonds have a similar 6:3 ratio as peanuts, but are better because their fat profile is Sat=0.34:PUFA=1.1:MUFA=2.8
Walnuts have a better 6:3 ratio BUT are predominantly PUFA with little saturated and even less MUFA.
Also, the problem with getting omega 3s from seeds and nuts is, humans are very inefficient at converting ALA to EPA and DHA. So, the salmon source is key (I take krill oil capsules too).
Beef isn't a significant PUFA source, so I don't really concern myself with its fat content re: Omega 3 (although grass-fed is better in this regard--but again, beef is about half saturated and half MUFA--very little PUFA).
I stick to cage-free, organic- omega 3 enriched eggs--i haven't broken down the Omega 3 and 6 stuff as well for eggs--it's sort of all over the place, but eggs do have significant PUFA (but more saturated and even more MUFA).
I limit dairy too, but mainly due to the quality available and the lactose (sugar). I do eat grass-fed butter and full-fat yogurt some. If i had a cow, i'd be more inclined to branch out.
quote:
The reasoning is that when I eat this way I can visibly see (through data) and also physically feel that my run times/HR/ RHR are in much better places.
my RHR is mostly affected by my exercise level these days. when i'm training it is usually below 50. My HR zones remain steady during training. I try to fuel my activity (primarily skiing, running, swimming, and biking) with fat as primary, but as i noted in another post, i experiment with super starch and some complex carbs for races and all-day outings. And beer.
Posted on 2/16/18 at 4:30 pm to McLemore
Some of y’all take eating serious
Posted on 2/16/18 at 5:18 pm to windshieldman
quote:
Some of y’all take eating serious
the eating part is easy. it gets complicated because our food system has been so fricked up for so long that you have to deconstruct it just to get back to zero.
i figure most people have something they study and learn about to crazy degrees--cars, fishing, sports, etc.--one of mine is nutrition. as a cancer survivor, i'm always looking for practical ways to stay healthy.
and observing the increasingly fat and metabolically sick people out there makes me long for something better for humanity.
if all this stressed me out, it would be counterproductive. but it doesn't. it gives me hope in a lot of ways.
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 2/16/18 at 5:41 pm to McLemore
quote:
I try to fuel my activity (primarily skiing, running, swimming, and biking) with fat as primary
We are fairly similar with this being the main difference and the dairy difference . I agree that the quality of dairy is probably why I noticed such a significant change when I cut it out a few years ago.
I fuel lifting/running/biking/swimming with carbs though. Usually rice and lentils the night before. A piece of fruit the morning of and a smoothie loaded with kale/spinach, berries, and almond butter after.
It is what has worked for me. My stomach handles it well and I recover quickly using it so I have stuck with it.
You see a lot of "keto" guys tearing up bacon and burgers and butter. I know some of them are more conscious about the source of it, but if we are talking general population....they usually grab it from Wally World. Similar to the person starting to eat "healthy" that goes grab turkey bacon, wheat English muffins, regular old eggs, and a slice of cheese. (I like you, grab the cage free options)
This post was edited on 2/16/18 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 2/16/18 at 6:15 pm to thibtigerfan
i'm trying to find the balance with carb fueling for high-intensity stuff.
I mentioned somewhere (maybe earlier in this thread) that i totally ran out of steam on the last 2-3 miles of that trail half mar in Aspen in Sept. The altitude and relative lack of training didn't help, but it definitely taught me that my regular old high fat low carb way of eating, without mods isn't going to cut it.
my super starch (homemade "UCAN") and MCT powder mix in a 2 of the 4 bottles of my hydration belt really helps.
during my ski days, the food at our local hill is so good and cheap (and definitely not low-carb), i can't resist. chilis and soups w beans, egg rolls, wood-fired pizzas. i burn it all of quickly and remain fat adapted.
I mentioned somewhere (maybe earlier in this thread) that i totally ran out of steam on the last 2-3 miles of that trail half mar in Aspen in Sept. The altitude and relative lack of training didn't help, but it definitely taught me that my regular old high fat low carb way of eating, without mods isn't going to cut it.
my super starch (homemade "UCAN") and MCT powder mix in a 2 of the 4 bottles of my hydration belt really helps.
during my ski days, the food at our local hill is so good and cheap (and definitely not low-carb), i can't resist. chilis and soups w beans, egg rolls, wood-fired pizzas. i burn it all of quickly and remain fat adapted.
Popular
Back to top


3





